Skip to main content

I have been perplexed by the Republican preoccupation with Sharia Law, rattling on as if Islam was going so somehow take over our country through as series of voter referendums, or something.

While some Republicans warn that the code of law could infiltrate American culture, scholars and experts say there's little chance of the justice system being overtaken by Islamic rule.

The Family Leader — an Iowa-based Christian conservative group — has asked GOP presidential-nomination hopefuls in the last few weeks to sign a "Marriage Vow" that includes a pledge to reject "Sharia Islam and all other anti-woman, anti-human-rights forms of totalitarian control." And earlier this year, Republican hopeful Herman Cain said he would not be comfortable appointing a Muslim to his Cabinet or the federal bench.

"There is this attempt to gradually ease sharia law and the Muslim faith into our government," Cain told Think Progress, a liberal blog. "It does not belong in our government."

Scholars and experts be damned! WTF do THEY know?

Republicans clearly know better.

In the interest of transparency and to let readers know my sentiments on the issue, I think republicans are sociopathic liars, one and all At least those at the level of Mayor on up. Regular, day-to-day people who identify with the republican brand, maybe not so muc; but any of them that have lifted a finger to runj for office are liars. cheats, racists, and worse.

However, I have been relatively clueless about what I have seen as a huge nonsense issue, this Sharia Law stink they keep wanting to start.

Why?

Nobody in their right mind will believe such a thing. It's PREPOSTEROUS!

But then I was reading Meteor Blades Daily Kos post:Newly enacted abortion laws taking personal toll. Texas requires invasive sonograms, too. In reading through comments I believe the answer has dawned on me:

Republicans KNOW they intend to enact as many heinously draconian laws as possible and to deflect attention from this agenda they are simply trying the "Hey! Look over there! technique.
Republicans, as most of us who see things clearly have known since the Bush Years, have wanted to turn this former bastion of freedom into a version of the Handmaid's Tale, a hardass Christian Theocracy that would seem different from Islamic customs only because of the clothing people wear and the general absence of beards....as well as the blinding whiteness of the Republican party and the 1%.

Their ugly and mean-spirited war on women - assailing personal choice, forcing them through all manner of humiliations, assailing Planned Parenthood; the list is endless - is absolutely no different than some cave-dwelling Mullah in Afghanistan howling about men not growing their beards or throwing acid on the faces of girls attending school. (Republicans are anti-education to: I swear they go bowling with Mulluahs).

Their agenda, their goals, their values are so very similar to the goals and values of hardline Islam, a concrete, narrow, and clearly mean-spirited interpretation of Old Testament Law that they have decided, as they are good at doing, to jump ahead of the complaints by distracting the 'public discourse' away from their intentions and onto the specter of "Sharia Law, much as they try to cover their myriad schemes to commit vote fraud by whining about vote fraud all the time.

Republicans WANT Sharia Style Law because they intend to implement a Christian Theocracy no different than Sharia Law.

To paraphrase Ol' Herman Cain:

There is this attempt to gradually ease sharia Old Testament law and the Muslim Christian faith into our government," Cain told Think Progress, a liberal blog. "It does not belong in our government."
No Hermy... it doesn't.
EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

claude, Superskepticalman, Ed in Montana, Mimikatz, DeminNewJ, MadRuth, Trendar, Geenius at Wrok, DjW, Sherri in TX, Wintermute, cotterperson, Jay C, eeff, Creosote, regis, JohnInWestland, TracieLynn, CoolOnion, mrblifil, CanisMaximus, dksbook, Texknight, menodoc, danthrax, sockpuppet, Damnit Janet, defluxion10, never forget 2000, lcrp, zerelda, randallt, CanYouBeAngryAndStillDream, Pola Halloween, lyvwyr101, vacantlook, Josiah Bartlett, Frank Vyan Walton, kbman, maybeeso in michigan, Tinfoil Hat, UncleCharlie, Alice Venturi, Brooke In Seattle, boofdah, SaraBeth, jimreyn, jeff in nyc, rb608, Rogneid, Alan Arizona, Philpm, snazzzybird, BachFan, detroitmechworks, cybersaur, tonyahky, Hear Our Voices, kestrel9000, VictorLaszlo, Son of a Cat, blueoasis, middleagedhousewife, Turbonerd, onionjim, SingerInTheChoir, thenekkidtruth, Unknown Quantity, doingbusinessas, One Pissed Off Liberal, dotsright, ColoTim, offgrid, rgjdmls, certainot, millwood, GeorgeXVIII, skod, Azubia, Vinnie Vegas, rogerdaddy, OleHippieChick, Youffraita, jamess, mikeconwell, moose67, Calamity Jean, Cassandra Waites, Jake Williams, Jeff Y, brasilaaron, Gemina13, rodentrancher, palantir, squarewheel, Purple Priestess, 207wickedgood, maggiejean, CamillesDad1, DefendOurConstitution, MKSinSA, kevinpdx, Shelley99, strangedemocracy, collardgreens, brentbent, LaughingPlanet, ATFILLINOIS, Garfnobl, cordgrass, batchick, DerAmi, Oh Mary Oh, Bluefin, Teknocore, Bluerall, gravlax, cama2008, KVoimakas, sound of progress, zenox, leftykook, aerie star, Mathazar, IowaBiologist, jacey, Siri, nellgwen, a2nite, swampyankee, JGibson, congenitalefty, jan4insight, MartyM, qannabbos, FrY10cK, dotdash2u, George3, Lizabet, Canis Aureus, Chaddiwicker, Dancun74, Jeff Murdoch, LaraJones

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site