Skip to main content

Originally Published at International Policy Digest (http://www.internationalpolicydigest.org/)

Toward Comparative Advantage

The innovation and integration set in motion throughout Central and South America over the past decade is replacing the notion that effective market strategies must be devised within the zero-sum framework. Unifying socio-political schemes and initiating region-centric policies has made regional comparative advantage Latin America’s primary focus over the past decade.

Casting aside some of the principles underlying Western-style capitalism will afford Latin America’s leadership the opportunity to distance themselves from the policies and programs that created rampant inequality and strained relations throughout the region.
Rising income disparities over the prior decades created greater regional vulnerabilities to unfamiliar and unpredictable forces, leading to economic instability and social dislocation. National governments responded by initiating programs that reinforced domestic and regional economies with the expectation that the process will be long and arduous, due primarily to the strain a nation must endure when replacing an old order with an alien system. Success in bettering the future is dependent upon forging strong relationships between the government and the private sector, focusing primarily on stewardship, which can cultivate the most profitable outcome.

Latin America’s success over the past decade is due to the public sector’s increased role in domestic economic affairs and regional integration, which has been a long-term response to concerns over the region’s economic strength and global competitiveness.

Globalization’s benefits have yet to be distributed equally as it has afforded developed countries the ability to strengthen and justify their relative dominance in regional affairs. Western interference in Latin American economies and the negative affects that followed led many regional leaders to slowly abandon the philosophy that all the policies that made the developed world richer could be universally applied.

Over time it became apparent that advancement in the capital market system is dependent upon one entity holding power over others. In the case of lesser-developing countries, the developed world’s desire to limit a nation’s comparative advantage to primary resource exportation was initiated to promote the developed world’s policies of self-interest.

Globalizing Inequality and the Case of Argentina

The system was never designed to be universally inclusive, as is apparent in the development and implementation of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). In The Case Against the Global Economy, Jerry Manders and Edward Goldsmith outlined how this accord strengthened market integration by forcing the developing world “to accept all investments from abroad; give ‘national treatment’ to any foreign corporation that establishes itself within its borders…eliminate tariffs and import quotas on all goods…and abolish nontarriff (sic) barriers, such as regulations to protect labor, health, or the environment that might conceivably increase corporate costs”.

External influence was not the sole impediment to the advancement of a strong central authority, for many Latin American leaders had an incessant belief in the philosophy of a self-regulating private sector. This confidence in corporate self-regulation weakened national development, created policy inefficiencies, and fostered disinterest in market competition.

For Latin Americans, the inequality that arises from policies and programs instituted by IGOs is illustrated by Argentina’s slow economic collapse.

In 1994, the World Bank urged the Argentinean government to initiate social security privatization during a time of massive economic reform, exacerbating an already weakened national economy.

During this period, concessions also had to be made to the IMF in order to receive the finances already promised to Argentina to cover the nation’s debt. By 2001, the IMF forced Argentina to make a series of cuts to its existing social security program – an action that world not have been advised in the developed world.

The lending guidelines established by these institutions led to the enacting of reforms focused on benefiting the private sector.

Furthermore, they proscribed counter-cyclical policies that were used to insure the monetary investments of international investors made in regional markets. The domestic market situation coupled with external pressure led to a national economic collapse that has lasted over a decade.

For Latin America – particularly Argentina – globalization became the fundamental force in shaping international inequality and exclusion. The international community’s influence in regional affairs “undermined the ability of governments to manage their economies through national economic policies” and “called into question the ability of governments to pursue other national goals such as environmental preservation and labor policies”. Influencing the creation and implementation of domestic economic policies led many countries to construct increasingly protectionist agendas.

Protectionist policies were created “to insulate the domestic economy from international competition”; policies were established under GATT that no longer allowed “governments…[to] use tariffs and quotas as tools of national economic policy”.

These policies were utilized to not only protect domestic industries, but also to guard foreign businesses, already in country, from international rivalries.

Toward a Latin American Decade

During the contemporary period of economic stagnation, austerity programs, and bailouts, Latin America’s economies have improved by six percent. Economic growth is attributed to the increased injection of foreign capital into domestic markets over the past decade, which has been driven by gains in commodities pricing.

There have been both negative and positive affects to the new found interest in Latin America. Expanding regional economies caused currencies to strengthen in relation to the U.S. dollar and sparked fears of higher prices for imported goods.

Though costlier imports can have a negative impact on certain sectors of a national economy, stronger currencies illustrate Latin America’s growing economic prowess.
Improving currency valuations will assist consumers in purchasing goods and services from regional producers, attract investors into regional markets, as well as ameliorate Latin America’s comparative advantage.

The more pessimistic responses to valuation shifts have ushered in growing concern over whether Latin America’s economies are heading toward an inflationary period.
With many countries becoming increasingly reliant on imports and meager national surpluses slowly becoming modest deficits, concerns over the new policies being implemented are justified, particularly due to the region’s track record in the 1980s and 1990s.

Explanations for Latin America’s failures have centered on environmental degradation, corporatism, and international exploitation; a confidence game set in motion by an oligopoly feigning concern over national development.

Regional market stagnation and income inequality were a result of resource-dependent export markets being directed by private investors, coupled with socio-political frailty, which weakened national institutions, destabilized long-term economic programs, and led to the proliferation of informal markets and violent non-state actors.

National leaders have been slowly reversing the policies and programs that undermined regional development in the past, though, not surprisingly, this has brought about stark criticism from nations that espouse the values of unfettered free markets. The economic programs being implemented throughout Latin America have been derided as counter-productive by many in the global North; an interesting juxtaposition in contemporary economic policy in that while the more affluent nations implement austerity programs the global South is positioning itself for an economic resurgence.
Changes in domestic markets have been promoted through modifications in national policies and coincided with the counter-cyclical programs, which stimulated regional progress over the past decade.

The primary goal for national and regional development has been the shoring up of domestic economies and the security of regional resources. Latin American leaders have refrained from burdening their nations with too much risk, while refusing to halt investments in the policies and programs that have brought about the strongest economic growth in decades.

Latin America in 2012

For the past decade, Latin America’s domestic and regional markets have become increasingly reliant on commodities pricing and foreign investments; however, the currency crisis in Europe has caused many nations to focus on risk aversion policies.
Global economic failures exposed the dominating financial models’ insufficiencies and undermined the West’s ability to dictate domestic and regional policy development. It is due to the international economic collapse that developing countries moved away from global capitalism, vindicating critics of the market system.

The 2012 Latin American Economic Outlook, drafted at the Iberian-American Summit in Paraguay in October 2011, illustrated the shift in the region’s economic development between 2010 (5.9% growth) and 2011 (4.4% growth). Slowing in the region’s economies is due, in part, to domestic policies being initiated in Brazil to focus consumer demand and realign market progress enough to diminish possible over-expansion and over-heating in the domestic economy.

Brazil’s expanding economy has been aided by growth in the industrial and production sectors, which has reduced the nation’s demand for imported goods and services and diminished its reliance on commodities. These new policies; coupled with declining interest rates, loosening taxation policies, rising wages, and lowering unemployment; has allowed for a strong economic outlook for the medium- and long-term and has catapulted the country into becoming the sixth largest economy in the world – projected to be the fourth by 2020.

For continued success, Latin America and the Caribbean must focus on the development of domestic economies and social safety nets, in order to ensure regional security and stability. Failure to do so could lead to the reversal of the progress made over the past decade. Fears are growing as Europe struggles to stabilize its economies, but Latin America seems to have the correct policies and programs – reinforced by foreign investment, strengthening safety nets, and inflation modeling – in place to begin to balance the global recession against the increasing consumer demands of an expanding middle-class.

Originally posted to Epsilon Red on Mon Feb 20, 2012 at 07:33 PM PST.

Also republished by Foreign Relations.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Nulwee, la urracca

    "Politics is a means of preventing people from taking part in what properly concerns them." - Paul Valery

    by Epsilon on Mon Feb 20, 2012 at 07:33:13 PM PST

  •  Are you the author of this piece? (0+ / 0-)

    While it is very interesting, you may not quote more than three paragraphs of an article published elsewhere, or you may well be infringing on a copyright.

     Unless, of course, it is yours, and you are free to post it elswhere.

  •  And I do see that you might well be (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Nulwee

    the author.
    So...now I will re-read more calmly...

  •  Yes it is my work. I apologize for the confusion.. (0+ / 0-)

    I should have done better specifying that part of it. I started working for the IPD website and I was neglecting my DK profile. I wanted to create something original for the Foreign Relations board but his writers block, so I thought I would repost from something I had completed earlier.

    "Politics is a means of preventing people from taking part in what properly concerns them." - Paul Valery

    by Epsilon on Tue Feb 21, 2012 at 04:15:45 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site