... probably not.
or hyenas?
... it doesn’t seem likely, but it might be on the menu from time to time.
or rabbits?
... no, no, never, not in a million years - but I can imagine, according to what I read in the news, that a fair number of Catholic priests often enjoy a loin of rabbit, probably with a weasel appetizer.
Mr. Santorum’s harping on the Christian ‘sex is only for procreation’ doctrine, which began to be imposed way back in the first and second centuries A.D. (along with seriously anti-female views), has made me wonder whether or not he follows the prohibitions on eating certain animals which were also being imposed at the same time.
Specifically,
... eating weasels was forbidden because doing so would cause those who ate them to participate in oral sex. Because, of course, weasels copulate with their mouths.
... and eating hyenas was forbidden because doing so would cause those who ate them to commit adultery. Because, of course, hyenas change their sex every year; male this year, female next year, then male again the following year, ....
... and eating rabbits was forbidden because doing so would cause those who ate them to have sex with children, especially boys. Because, of course, rabbits grow a new anus every year and this abundance of anuses could only lead to promiscuity.
So Rick, how about you and the missus having a nice weasel fricassee tonight? It might help you, and your wife, relax and bring you a little more into the 21st century.
Come on Rick, eat a little weasel.
No weasels, hyenas or rabbits were harmed in the writing of this text.
For more information see: Barnabas, the Epistle of Barnabas, Clement of Alexandria, the Paedagogus, and Origen.