Skip to main content

This is potentially the best news I have gotten all month.

"The Obama administration on Thursday will unveil a consumer privacy "bill of rights" that aims to give web users more control over how their personal information is collected and used online."

You can read the whole story at the Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

There is even a provision to protect consumers from being economically disadvantaged by would-be employers trolling the net for signs that perhaps you shouldn't be hired because you are:
Too liberal
Too Progressive
Too Conservative
Too Feminist
Too Ecologically Sensitive
Too OWs
Too Gay
Too Straight
Too Religious
Not Religious
Not Religious Enough
Wrong Church
 or any other ridiculous individual trait that should have no bearing whatsoever on your ability to find a goddamn job.

My personal pet peeve--being the local go-to person for anything you are afraid to ask your doctor or pastor.

If Google and the Government were to look at my internet search habits, they would be horrified and mystified simultaneously.

How many watch-lists could I be on? Your guess is as good as mine.

Personally I would like to see Google [and other search engines] have to give up the claim of an optimal, intuitive search engine claim. The Filter Bubble just guides you to a corporate agenda and other paying customers. It doesn't necessarily take you where you want or need to go, or where you should be going for your information. And worse it often hides what you want to see.

They could claim electronic yellow pages, but to pretend that this somehow puts them on par with a [neutral] library card catalog is ridiculous. If I want intuition, I will call a psychic. But when I do a search, I want straight up results. I don't want to waste time trying to guess my way around hidden search algorithms that make no sense whatsoever in terms of serious research. The google filter bubble directly threatens Net Neutrality, and in my opinion is a form of censorship. But that's just me.

Your search results differ based on your origin/IP address. So when I do a search on Liberal or Progressive causes, are some of those results filtered out or moved lower on the results because I am searching from Oklahoma? This is but one of the questions I have asked but found no satisfactory answer for.

The announcement is good news, but only time will tell if it will be enforced. I am not holding my breath on that one.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Enfocement, or the lack thereof, is one of the (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    GreenMother

    biggest elephants in the room and has been for going on 3 generations that I've seen. We go on and on about how we need this law and that law, but never have I heard anyone with a microphone taking about the fact that when the law and Big Money are in conflict, the law is ignored.

    "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire

    by Greyhound on Thu Feb 23, 2012 at 02:44:33 PM PST

    •  I agree with you! (0+ / 0-)

      It took big corporations and our government to figure out just how important the internet has become for organizing movements. But now that they have caught on, look what happens.

      Tracking. Data Mining, Dossiers. and *Filter Bubbles and now Legally paid Shills to run interference with social discussions regarding the issues of the day aka Electronic Astroturfing.

      It's disgusting.

      And now that most of our federal government docs are all online, with no third  party oversight--how do you think that will end at our paperless federal document repositories with the creation and enforcement of the Patriot Act?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site