Skip to main content

During the debate last night the brilliant mind of Newt Gingrich, which seems a fact free, vacuous space filled with platitudes and inanities, gave us his solution to the deficit problem: fire every military and civilian employee and don't hire replacements. Specifically he said,

I think that if we were prepared to repeal the 130-year-old civil service laws and go to a modern management system, we could save a minimum of $500 billion a year with a better system.
$500 Billion and not a penny less.

What Mr. Newt doesn't seem to understand is that the entire cost of salary and benefits of all Federal employees, military and civilian is about $430 Billion (p.122) So when Newt eliminates the entire Federal Government, including Congress, the Judicial branch and the entire military he'll still be $70 Billion short. Of course since Newt is eliminating all employees, he's also eliminating is own position, but that's another subject.

Looking closely at what Newt said, maybe he was only talking about eliminating the civilian workforce, leaving the guys in uniform untouched. He started with,

if we were prepared to repeal the 130-year-old civil service laws and go to a modern management system

That 130 year old law he refers to can only be the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act which eliminated the spoils/patronage system and established the competitive Civil Service. That law does not apply to military personnel, but does apply to civilian workers in the Pentagon.

Of course if Newt only meant to eliminate the civilian workers, including the Postal Service and all the civilians working at the Defense Department, that would only save about $300 Billion, well short of his $500 Billion promise.

Putting Newt's inanities aside there are several important points here. People love to rail against Federal workers and complain about the money "wasted" on high salaries and excessive benefits. Well, if the truth were told people would know that salaries and benefits represent a relatively small size of the Federal Budget. For instance, in 2010 the Federal Budget was $3.7 Trillion. Of that, less than 4.5% — $160 Billion, went for pay and benefits of what most people refer to as the bureaucracy. The rest of the $287 Billion for compensation and benefits went to pay the uniformed military — $154 Billion, DOD civilian employees — $64 Billion, the Postal Service - $58 Billion, and the legislative and judicial branches — $7 Billion.

And that bureaucracy which people rail against? Those are the doctors, nurses and other folks in the VA who care for veterans, the Justice Department lawyers who prosecute criminals, the food inspectors who keep our food safe, the consumer watchdogs and bank examiners who protect our finances, the people at Health and Human Services who keep the Social Security and Medicare checks coming, the Forest Service and Park Service employees who care for our national heritage, the emergency managers at FEMA who rush to our communities during our time of need and the researchers at the National Institutes of Health who prevent and find cures for diseases, just to name a very, very few of the unsung Federal workers we rely on every day.

It is time to stop making Federal employees scapegoats for the perceived ills of the nation.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site