Skip to main content

Religious Freedom
Let me start by saying the idea that religious fantatics have hijacked the conversation about women's health is completely and utterly ridiculous.  I have no objection to religious people, as long as they keep their religion and their beliefs to themselves.  Personal religious beliefs are just that, personal, for them personally to live by.

I (almost) admire that they hold onto their beliefs with such conviction, but here's where it crosses the line.  When they hold onto those beliefs so strongly, that they insist, no demand, that everyone else live according to those beliefs.  They're claiming if everyone else doesn't live according to their belief system, it's a violation of their moral conscience.

More below the orange swoosh of freedom.

Here is the main problem with their argument.  Not everyone shares the same belief system.  So if every religious or non-religious group went around demanding that the entire country live according to their beliefs, it would be mass chaos.  For one religion to demand preferential treatment over another is a violation of the Constitution.  We are not a Christian nation. Our country was founded as a secular country, with religious freedom for ALL.  

Religious freedom has been defined by the Constitution and the Supreme Count countless times over our history as a nation.  Religious freedom is broadly defined as freedom of an individual, in public or private, to hold belief in teaching, practice, worship, and observance; the concept is generally recognized also to include the freedom to not follow any religion.

Religious freedom is a personal freedom. A person is free to exercise this freedom in anyway they see fit, as long as it does not infringe on another person's freedom.  That's the key to understanding this principle, it cannot infringe on anothers religious freedom.

By Christian zealots claim employer's religious beliefs are being violated by allowing employees to receive birth control at no cost is outlandish and outside of any current or previous definition of religious freedom.  Employers (as a person, not a company) have the right to believe in anything.  The line is crossed when they attempt to impose those beliefs on their employees, by denying access to medical coverage.  Employees are not slaves, their basic human rights are not revoked when they're on the clock and employers have very limited authority over what they do outside of working hours.  By an employer objecting to birth control for "religious reasons", it is blanketing their religious beliefs over the entire company, and in turn, infringing on the employee's religious freedom.
Religious Freedom
The flaw in their hysterical plan is that employees can take the money they're paid by the employer for services performed and use that money to buy birth control.  So even if the free birth control scenario is somehow resolved, are they next going to demand bank statements and health care records to ensure that their employees are not violating their moral conscience that way?  Will employers begin to deny insurance coverage to non-Christians?  Or reject coverage for medical procedures that go against their moral conscience? Where will it end if their child-like temper tantrum suceeds this time?

The solution is fairly simple. These zealots have the freedom to not take birth control. That's how freedom works.  Everyone has the ability to choose what is right for them. No one is forcing contraceptives down their throats, so please stop trying to force Christianity down mine.  Obama even made it easy, just pay your insurance premiums and you never have to see a birth control pill.  I don't agree with every program my tax dollars go toward, but I can't stop paying my taxes because some of the tax funded programs violate my "moral conscience".

So if you don't like birth control, don't take it.  Until them, stop obsessing over women's health, we all know this isn't about religion.  It's creepy and pathetic.  We all know that right-wingers have been trying to regulate women's uteruses and sexuality since this country was founded.  It scares them that women have the power of life and they have no ability to control it, so they try to degrade us as people, deny our rights, regulate our bodies, and then play it all off like it's "in God's name".  That's a violation of my moral conscience and it has nothing to do with religion.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Too much common sense here... (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    RoyaHegdahl, SuzieQ4624, sfbob, skrekk, LSophia

    You clearly need "saving". Keep it up, SusieQ.

  •  Evil Christians have declared war on ME. (5+ / 0-)

    I will not go quietly.

  •  here's where we differ (0+ / 0-)
    By Christian zealots claim employer's religious beliefs are being violated by allowing employees to receive birth control at no cost is outlandish and outside of any current or previous definition of religious freedom.  
    The way the employees receive them at no cost is by Forcing the employer to pay all the costs.

    If the employees would receive them at no cost without the employer picking up the tab, then there would be no problem with freedom.

    The flaw in their hysterical plan is that employees can take the money they're paid by the employer for services performed and use that money to buy birth control.
    That is not a flaw, the employees are free to spend their own money as they see fit.

    The employer would like the same freedom.

    •  I don't know if your purposely being obtuse... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      RoyaHegdahl

      but your wildly missing the point.

      Based on your argument, I can't stop paying taxes because I morally object to wars?  I mean, after all, the government is forcing me to pay for wars I don't agree with.

      BTW, everyone who pays taxes is already funding free birth control - it's called government funding for Planned Parenthood.

      Here's what you're missing.  Employers (as a company) do not have religious freedom.  They're a company, an entity, a business - not a person.  Employers (as a person) have the same religious freedoms we all have.

      The problem you're not seeing is when employers (as a person) try to invoke their human rights as a company.  See being a human being is not the same as being a business. Companies don't have human rights, therefore do not have religious freedom.  They're not humans.  Employer (as a person) has a right to object to birth control.  Employers (as a company) do not.

      •  i'm sure its quite unintentional :) (0+ / 0-)
        Based on your argument, I can't stop paying taxes because I morally object to wars?  I mean, after all, the government is forcing me to pay for wars I don't agree with.
        Correct. The government has the authority to tax us and it has the authority to fight wars. It's right in the constitution. I suppose you could arrange your life so you pay no income taxes and therefore don't support the war with your money.
        Here's what you're missing.  Employers (as a company) do not have religious freedom.  They're a company, an entity, a business - not a person.  Employers (as a person) have the same religious freedoms we all have.
        Employers can be individual people. Of else they are gorups of people, And all people have religious freedom. Forcing the company to do something forces people to do things. No way around that.
  •  I just want to say (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    LSophia

    SuzieQ4624, you are awesome!

  •  This diary rocks (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    RoyaHegdahl

    There's nothing like a good Friday rant.  :)

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site