Skip to main content

Title Page VLTP Report

French economist Frederick Bastiat once wrote:

“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living in society, they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.”
The above quote was used in my last diary but it is so appropriate to the situation we American's find ourselves in, I chose to use it again as a lead in to this diary...

Since the mid 1950's the Indiana Toxicology Lab has contracted out the testing of blood, urine and other substances relied upon by Courts, Prosecutors and defense attorneys, to the Indiana University School of Medicine Laboratory.  Cases involved include charges of murder, rape, drunk driving, possession or use of marijuana, cocaine and other drug substances. Indiana Uni­versity runs the toxi­cology de­part­ment by state statute.

In December 2009 a new Director was appointed to the Indiana Department of Toxicology due to reports about the va­lid­ity of blood, urine and chemical test results, a long backlog of cases and slow statewide imple­mentation of expensive new breath-test­ing equip­ment.

IU hired for­mer Mar­ion County Pros­ecutor Scott Newman in August 2010 to help fix the agency. Newman or­dered an au­dit of all blood test results from 2007 to 2009 -- more than 10,000 cases.  The audit of the lab's marijuana tests found an 8.2 percent error rate. Early data returned indicated a problem in at least 10% of all cases examined - positive results that when retested returned negative or inconclusive findings.  The investigation revealed that technicians used a rare provision that allowed inconclusive test results to be manually "manipulated" by a technician.  This procedure was used time and again and contributed to the erroneous result outcomes in more than 50 of the cases reviewed.

Following this initial information in 2010. Governor Mitch Daniels (R) ordered that the investigation be removed from IU's responsibility and control and had his office take over the continuing probe.  Daniels appointed a three member panel to move forward.

Defense attorneys back in 2010-2011 questioned who was going to pay for the continuing investigation and asked how many people had been convicted by the use of false evidence?

"If these results are inaccurate, there may be a person who served some jail time based on what amounts to false evidence," Maternowski said. "Our entire Constitution is designed to protect your freedom and your liberty, and when we're convicting people based on unreliable evidence, that's a big problem."

"You need an expert to understand them (lab results), to be able to identify what is exactly wrong with it, and that costs money," Hennessy said. "Who's going pay for that is the next question in my mind."

Indeed who is on the hook for this ongoing investigation, retesting and for the money wasted in completed court hearings, trials and the needless incarceration of Hoosiers due to the manipulations by the IU lab?  This is a question I'll return to momentarily - while we look at the latest in this ongoing story.

The three member panel appointed by Daniels has the results from preliminary testing and is refusing to make that information public - though at least one panel member has urged a public release.  The Indiana Supreme Court became involved in the investigation authorizing a retesting of as many as 500 cases.  Their findings:

"...confirmed Monday that the state Department of Toxicology provided incorrect test results for use in criminal cases, setting a course for what almost certainly will be legal challenges.

"The full extent of testing problems at the lab remains unknown, but a task force headed by two judges from the Indiana Court of Appeals found at least five cases where retested samples 'did not reveal any of the substances originally reported'.

"A report issued by the Supreme Court about the task force's work said about 500 other samples were either inadequate for retesting or showed some presence of drugs or "a successor substance." But the report didn't address one critical issue: whether test results from those samples would meet the scientific and legal standards to stand up in court."


Cases reviewed by the task force were only a fraction of the thousands of positive marijuana and cocaine tests called into question by an independent audit of lab procedures.

Governor Daniels' decision to place the investigation under the authority of his office has had the effect of stifling any release of factual information to the general public.  His task force remains tight lipped about the numbers, percentages and other important findings made by this investigation that has been ongoing for nearly 3 years now.

The Supreme court statement did note that in the 500 cases reviewed by the task force, 497 defendants pleaded guilty to crimes and 18 are in jail. It was not clear whether any of the false positive test results involved the 18 people still incarcerated.

"Newman, who spent nearly a year as a consultant working to correct shortcomings at the lab, oversaw an audit that found extensive problems with the lab's processes and documentation. That work was abruptly stopped when oversight of the lab was transferred last summer from the Indiana University School of Medicine to the governor's office. The problems have been downplayed by a three-member panel appointed by the governor to oversee the lab.

"Newman said he is still concerned about characterizations that problems auditors found were merely those of "protocol" and didn't affect physical testing.

"'You really can't separate protocols from results,'" Newman said. 'They're bound up together."'

Department of Toxicology attorney Teri Kendrick last month denied a public-records request from the media seeking the test results. The newspaper is appealing that decision with the state's Public Access Counselor.

Impact Upon Defendants:
Some people may have pleaded guilty based on bad lab test results, said Larry Landis, executive director of the Indiana Public Defender Council.

"Public defenders rely on those results," he said. "You assume they are right."

Landis added that most public defenders and their clients don't have the time, money or expertise to challenge lab results.  A court spokeswoman said she did not have access to more detailed information Monday afternoon on the number -- other than "at least five" -- of new test results that didn't match the original finding reported by the department.

What all of the preliminary articles and findings did tell the public prior to the embargo put in place by Governor Daniels, was that thousands of criminal cases involving toxicological determinations were affected by the shortcomings of the IU lab.  Since the IU School of Medicine has been under contract to the state for half a century to provide lab findings in criminal cases, the impact upon defendants - and the taxpayers who paid for those reports - is astronomical, in both loss of personal freedoms and wasted tax dollars.

How many people have been forced to plead guilty to charges that were supported by the results of lab results performed by IU under their state contract?  UNKNOWN. How many thousands of individual cases involving alcohol, marijuana or cocaine use in DUI charges resulted in pleas or convictions? UNKNOWN. How many thousands of individuals paid their fines, did time in county jails or prisons based upon those convictions?  UNKNOWN. How many thousands now have criminal records as a result of these fraudulent laboratory results - can't get good jobs, are denied necessary bonding, refused entry into the armed forces or ineligible for state jobs - and have been harmed by this? UNKNOWN.

What provisions is the Indiana Supreme Court and Governor Daniels making for those previously convicted whose cases are long over, the evidence used to convict destroyed - who remain tarnished by their arrest and conviction record?  NONE.  How many families affected due to this fiasco, reputations ruined, college grants and tuition programs denied because of records of drug and other convictions or arrests? UNKNOWN.

An additional aspect under the heading of "IMPACT" of all this is the question of how many individuals applying for state jobs have been subjected to drug testing by the Indiana Toxicology Lab with inconclusive or manipulated findings by IU? So how many potential hires had the same results of their drug testing when applying for state or government jobs?  How many lives altered, salaries lost? UNKNOWN.

The Costs:
But never fear, Hoosiers...our Governor has a plan that will allow all of this to be worked out - those incarcerated can raise claims to challenge their convictions based upon possibly tainted lab results.

"I think there is still a great deal to be learned about the details of individual cases and even classes of cases," (IN. Supreme Court Chief Justice) Shepard said, "but I am confident in the path the task force has identified for individuals to raise questions they may have about their cases."

"The most likely approach to challenging testing results is through a legal process called post-conviction relief. It is a way to appeal convictions based on new evidence.

"The court's statement said the process "should provide a vehicle for individuals to seek relief from a guilty plea conviction based on a possible State Department of Toxicology Lab test error."

"Legal experts said that removes an obstacle that often prevents defendants from even receiving a hearing.

This way of "handling" a massive problem that may have put thousands - or over the course of half a century, tens of thousands - in prison based in part upon faulty reporting of blood, drug and related evidence, places the burden upon the victims to now return to court and challenge their convictions.  These challenges will involve the use of the IN. Public Defender's office which is already underfunded and overworked.  More tax dollars will have to be set aside to pay for the court hearings, retesting of evidence and to fund the PD's involvement.

Taxpayers will also be on the hook for any civil suits that arise due to claims of false imprisonment - not simply the jury award of damages, but in defending the cases in civil court; court costs, attorney fees, expert witnesses, jury expenses.

Having been through our court system(s) previously I can tell you from experience, that in many cases where inmates challenge their confinement based upon "evidentiary" misconduct or use, the courts find the error to be "harmless" ruling a conviction would still have been possible even after excluding the evidence that was used to convict.  This is nothing more than a sham used to continue to incarcerate and give the state an "out" by putting the responsibility for redress in the hands of the victims.  The victims have already suffered at the hands of the state.  Many will be found to have plead guilty to charges because their counsel could not refute the clear and convincing "evidence" presented to the court by the State Toxicology Lab.  The courts will also have an "Out" by now being able to claim the victim/defendant participated in the travesty when they plead guilty - a finding that would absolve the state from costly damage claims and payouts.  The reasoning being that no normal sane individual would plead guilty to something they were not guilty of - not taking into account the coercion that was used by attorneys and prosecutors upon defendants based upon the findings of these lab reports, leaving the defendant with an unavoidable outcome should he/she insist upon innocence and take their case to court.

It is bad enough to steal a person's freedom and place them in jails and prisons for something they did not do.  To learn later that the evidence used to strip a person of those freedoms was possibly erroneous and tainted to begin with - and then require the victim to prove that was the case, adds insult to injury...and is going to further place Indiana taxpayers on the hook for possibly tens of millions of dollars in court costs, damage awards, legal fees and the costs of victims pursuing expungements of their criminal records. These millions will be in addition to the tens of millions already spent to secure improper convictions as well as good money paid to the IU School of Medicine Lab to properly perform necessary and critical testing upon evidence submitted.

Again what have been the costs to those whose cases have already been concluded, closed and the case file destroyed?  They have the convictions upon their record - convictions that now have serious concerns about the evidence used to obtain pleas or convictions.  What of them? How are those tens of thousands of cases to be resolved to compensate the former defendants/"criminals"?  Governor Daniels and the Republican legislature is staying silent on this issue.  What is going to be done for those denied jobs, bonding, security clearances and employment due to what we now know were possibly false evidentiary reports?

This is a part of the "war on drugs" that has been hidden away from the view of the public - possibly not just in Indiana, either.  You see, Indiana is one of the states with contracts to privatize prison facilities.  Have/are any of the inmates at this private prison facility serving sentences that were based upon the lab findings by IU SoM?  Certainly.  Is Geo Group profiting off of these men they house for the state? Again, certainly.  Who is paying for this housing?  Indiana Taxpayers.  Fact is, in the rush to craft laws to make everything drug related illegal in the U.S. lawmakers were not so concerned with factual findings or determinations of guilt, they were more interested in convictions that could be used to further profit off of incarceration.  As the statistic provided by the IN. Supreme Court demonstrated of the 500 cases reviewed by them the lab findings were either different than the findings provided by IUSoM or inconclusive.  In 497 of these 500 cases "defendants" plead guilty.  Consider that the cases reviewed were just some of those between 2007 and 2009 and we begin to get the picture of a system that has been used to wrench please of guilty and imprison thousands and put thousands more under some form of probation - needlessly and based upon false evidence.  All in pursuit of the war on drugs.  While the largest number of those impacted were/are those charged with drug crimes - many others charged with other crimes including murder, DUI, assaults and rape have been subjected to the same false findings and sent to prison.  This situation is aggravated due to privatization; prisons, jails, medical care - and the contracting of processing of evidence used in Indiana's courts.

In fact Indiana - as a red state - has a long history of privatization as witnessed by this one example involving the testing of critical judicial and criminal evidence by a state university.  In 1997, Indiana signed a four-year contract with a private firm to provide health care for all state inmates and has current contracts with Geo Group to provide housing for state prisoners at a facility in New Castle.  (In 2007 this Geo contract resulted in a huge riot by AZ. inmates moved to the facility that cost Hoosier taxpayers a substantial amount to repair the facility and in prosecutions of the inmates involved in the riot).  Over the objections of many of us the Indiana DOC outsourced food services in 2005 to Aramark- a company with one of the worst possible track records of any company providing such services.

Of course the "Cabal's" official voice, the Heartland Institute applauded the contract award to Aramark and mentioned that several Indiana jails were already contracting with Aramark to provide food services.

Under Daniels Indiana lawmakers approved the privatization of our on toll road in northern IN., attempted to privatize the Hoosier Lottery and the state Medicaid determination responsibilities.  So like most other predominantly Republican states, IN. has followed the party line supporting privatization of state facilities, buildings and responsibilities - including public education.

This one situation in Indiana is now peeling back the "onion" that is the war on drugs and a pursuit of mass incarceration as a means of profiting off of the imprisonment of millions.  This is so undemocratic and harmful to our society is is almost unbelievable.  When we add to this IU SoM scandal that of the "investigator" that used her trained dogs to gather evidence in hundreds of criminal cases that resulted in the imprisonment of many - and later she was convicted of planting evidence that led to numerous convictions; the cases of police who have been found to have planted evidence in hundreds of other cases that led to convictions, we see an overall picture of tens of thousands of individuals falsely arrested, convicted and imprisoned  - and profits generated off of that imprisonment.  Factoring in the families affected by all these cases involving deliberate or "accidental" manipulations, the numbers easily reach into the millions.  Each one of those numbers representing ruined lives, or lives altered by the actions of others pursuing corporate or personal gain off of the misery of others.  It is a sick, sad and despicable practice - and easily avoidable: JUST DON'T INCARCERATE FOR PROFIT! Secondly states should be forced to stop outsourcing important responsibilities such as the testing of chemicals, blood and other evidence used in criminal prosecutions.  The risk of erroneous findings presented by an outside provider is too great to weigh the lives of our citizens against their performance under a "contract".

When we consider that if the testing had of been done to the standards required by the state and the results 100% verified, thousands of cases under consideration by state prosecutors would have been dismissed for lack of evidence and defense attorneys would have had the basis of a defense with findings of negative testing results.  Millions upon millions of dollars have been paid out in prosecutions based upon these inaccurate tests and in many cases that would not have been necessary with true results and determinations exonerating thousands.

Today we are aware of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and their involvement in crafting, drafting and passing legislation used to incarcerate millions.  At the same time ALEC implemented additional legislation to allow companies access to the billions of tax dollars spent on that incarceration through contracted imprisonment, healthcare, feeding, transportation, prison labor, manufacturing and related services.  Through them the conservative factions in our political arena have had great success over the years.  They are all for eliminating government oversight (think EPA and environmental issues) - oversight that would uncover such problems as now faced by Indiana.  When discovered there is no cry issued by ALEC or the cabal to immediately take steps to free those whose freedom has been unjustly taken from them.  No they work instead to limit the exposure first.  Secondly they seek ways to place the burden of proving they have been harmed upon the victim him/her self.  This is not isolated - no, take a glance at ALEC's model legislation on Asbestos litigation.  In a similar manner they wish to put the burden upon those harmed to "prove" that the harm is a direct result of a specific asbestos product, or from employment in a factory using asbestos products or manufacturing it.

Through the likes of ALEC states charge forward with privatization and limiting government oversight.  When privatization results in problems such as here in Indiana with the State Toxicology Lab contract, the initial response is to limit investigation and if that is not possible, use the authority of sympathetic Governors to limit exposure by hiding any investigation and refuse to release the incriminating facts to the public.  When it can no longer be kept behind the curtain, they work to reduce liability by laying some of the blame upon the victim - and make them responsible for having to make a case to the same court system that imprisoned them or found them guilty, for exoneration and compensation.

This situation in Indiana is just one of dozens of articles and stories revolving around incarceration in the U.S. today.  With the research and digging being done by many into ALEC and the cabal, more and more of these stories of needless laws and incarceration are coming out.  I find it non-coincidental that Indiana with a Governor who has attended many ALEC conferences on behalf of two presidents (Reagan and Bush II) and pushing ALEC's Right-to-work (for less), privatization of education and public utilities and facilities, is at the heart of this most recent controversy.  One involving the rights of state citizens versus corporate profits.

I'd move away from this unjust policing...but to where?  ALEC and this agenda is now in all 50 states and growing larger by the day.  Soon it will not only be problematic to be a known American overseas - it will be dangerous here in the U.S....

Those who continue to call America the "land of the free" need a wake-up call and cold splash of reality.  We have become a nation that abides torture, makes unnecessary wars upon others over oil and politics, imprisons the worlds largest number of their society, sanctions phone taps, rendition...and has a former President and his Cabinet members who cannot even leave the safe harbor of the U.S. without fearing arrests for war crimes and crimes against humanity - yet they walk free within our borders and are considered by their party and Republican voters as having had a successful administration.

I have to ask "what in the hell has become of our country and society?"  How have we been so blind for so long as to allow this kind of damage to befall our neighbors, family and friends?  Finally, I think many are starting to comprehend the "tough on crime" rhetoric used to incarcerate, is just that - rhetoric used to endorse mass incarceration and enrich those invested in the Prison Industrial Complex.  

Please join the F-29 Occupy Protest against ALEC and corporations involved in profiting off of incarceration.  It is nationwide and takes place tomorrow.  Please turn-out and lend your support for Occupy and the thousands languishing behind bars due to faulty evidence and profits.  Also make plans now to attend VLTP's All About ALEC Protest in Charlotte, NC. May 11th and 12th.  More on that to come in future articles...

Originally posted to Bob Sloan on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 03:09 PM PST.

Also republished by American Legislative Transparency Project and Progressive Hippie.

Poll

Do we need an overhaul of the entire U.S. Criminal Justice System - that prohibits privatization of any kind?

93%67 votes
1%1 votes
5%4 votes
0%0 votes

| 72 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Once again (11+ / 0-)

    the reporting that you re doing on all these related issues is just fantastic.  Thanks.

  •  Yes, Overhaul of the United States That Prohibits (5+ / 0-)

    privatization of government services of any kind.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 03:51:57 PM PST

    •  I heard that and agree 100% n/t (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Statusquomustgo

      "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled" http://piecp-violations.com/

      by Bob Sloan on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 04:30:33 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Indiana University is a public institution (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Bob Sloan, Calamity Jean

      The situation is appalling, but the state did not privatize its toxicology services. Rather, the government part of the state contracted out to the higher education part of the state. IU School of Medicine is highly regarded. I guess nothing should shock me anymore ... .

      The county coroner's office where I live is housed at the public university where I work, which is an NIH top 25 research institution. We have an appointed coroner-medical examiner who is required by law to be a board certified forensic pathologist. This person also is a professor of forensic pathology. Of course there is a whole facility with a staff of other physicians, including highly specialized experts normally not available in-house at the county level, as well as technicians and other support staff.

      At least in our situation, I would not trust that the county per se would provide better faciliticies or more highly qualified personnel. Probably, more exotic work would still have to be farmed out to the university. Or the state lab. Shudder. Ours is located in the capital city, is operated by the government part of the state, and is plagued by backlogs, bureaucracy and plain old politics.

      Just because you're not a drummer doesn't mean that you don't have to keep time. -- T. Monk

      by susanala on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 05:09:34 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  You're right about IU being a public institution (0+ / 0-)

        and thus the services they are providing to the state are not "factually" private.  There are certain functions which should be considered critical and governmental duties.  I believe the testing of chemicals and other evidentiary materials should fall to the judicial branch and not the educational branch of a local or state government  Some would argue - and make a good point - that as long as the service provided is accomplished by another arm of the same government, they're comfortable with that.

        In the case of a state that has the death penalty and a person's life hanging in the balance - or another with a 75 year sentence and loss of freedom at risk - I would rather see the judicial branch carry total responsibility.  Obviously a public university has a unique position within our communities and a duty to teach at the highest possible levels.  However, that teaching or performing such important tasks involving criminal convictions, should be professionally accomplished.  I know it costs the state less to have such operations performed by the University - and as you say previously IU SoM had an outstanding reputation.  But the result of such testing is of such importance the state has to have the facilities and personnel in place to handle such crucial testing - statewide.  Other states have such forensic laboratories operating strictly for law enforcement and I believe this is as it should be.  See the post right below though, about NC having similar issues with their state testing facility...so it isn't simply something problematic to outsourcing of those duties.

        Using public university labs for corroboration of the state findings - as a fact checking mechanism - or as an expert witness selection by the defense or state would be acceptable.  But in this case it has obviously been going on unchecked and without proper oversight for so many decades that the lives of thousands have possibly been harmed by the lack of proper regulation.  Another aspect is the reduction of funding for these public universities.  Every state has been doing it and I don't know if that has had any relationship with this kind of failures or not.  As the article indicated they had purchased equipment for breathalyzing testing and all of it had been sitting without being put to use - could that have anything to do with a lack of funding for that particular program?  Not sure.

        In the end another critical factor of importance are the students who participated in the testing performed by IU.  I know it was obviously supposed to have been under close supervision by the staff, but with bad protocols in place and no real effective oversight - how will this entire episode affect those students?  Will it lessen their "resume" as they graduate and move into the business world?  Again, not sure but this story will surely have a personal impact upon the students involved.  All the more reason to remove these procedures from the University and have it fall to the judicial branch for all such future testing.

        "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled" http://piecp-violations.com/

        by Bob Sloan on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 07:01:01 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

      •  IU had a great reputation (0+ / 0-)

        Indiana University is one of the two state flagships, and its specialties and competencies are better aligned to running a medical lab than are Purdue's.  

        "Politics should be the part-time profession of every citizen who would protect the rights and privileges of free people and who would preserve what is good and fruitful in our national heritage." -- Lucille Ball

        by Yamaneko2 on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 07:22:54 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  I know having been born and raised here with (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          lostinamerica

          family and friends who attended both universities.  When this story first began to surface in 2004 I was skeptical.  By now I'm convinced that this has been ongoing for decades now and caused irreparable harm and I am devastated knowing it was IU that was responsible for these problems.  

          Back in 2004 Mayor Peterson relieved our Forensic
          Services Agency Director James E. Hamby of his duties amid growing concern that the crime lab chief had covered up problems in his agency - which supervised the IU program. That was the first indication of problems.  IU and the Forensic Services Agency have such important responsibilities to the community and courts that once this began to be exposed they should have taken immediate steps to correct and pull the covers off the coverup.  Instead they split their concentrations by trying to keep the lid on and by making necessary changes at the same time - and the findings over the past two years indicate they were not successful with either.

          I know I'll get pushback for this article, but dammit the criticism is deserving.  So many lives at stake and so many already ruined while the mess was covered up...and Daniels is still trying to keep the lid on and prisoners in their cells.  Just damn sad for Indy.

          "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled" http://piecp-violations.com/

          by Bob Sloan on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 08:03:03 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

  •  We had a similar blowup in North Carolina (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Bob Sloan, susanala, Calamity Jean

    a few years back.  The state crime lab came under fire for twisting evidence and relying on hoakum science--resulting in an awful lot of innocent people going to jail.  And no, it wasn't privatized.

    •  Guess it doesn't have to be a private contractor (0+ / 0-)

      that does this kind of thing - state operators are just as liable to commit such atrocities.  Can't believe this is continuing unabated - increasing incarceration in the face of declining crime rates across the board.  Could it be possible that without such tricks incarceration would be nonprofitable?

      "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled" http://piecp-violations.com/

      by Bob Sloan on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 04:33:05 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  SEC filing by for profit prison operators (3+ / 0-)

        shows they project continued high levels of occupancy so long as current 3 Strike and drug and immigration policies remain in effect, which are more than 50% of incarcerations

        •  You're correct. They are depending upon the (0+ / 0-)

          current laws being controlling over the next two decades at least.  Which means they and their lobbyists would fight any attempts at criminal justice reform that would negatively impact their bottom lines.

          The crime rates are dropping steadily and that is why they have turned their attention to immigrant "detention" proper framing to attempt to refer to a policy of detention rather than incarceration - but the bars and denial of freedoms are the same.

          "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled" http://piecp-violations.com/

          by Bob Sloan on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 07:04:20 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

    •  Fred Zain may be one of the more egregious (0+ / 0-)

      examples of a director covering up his own lack of scientific knowledge by producing "false positives" upon demand by law enforcement agencies  

      •  Yeah - he's the one I was referring to rather (0+ / 0-)

        obliquely in the article: the W VA Crime lab trooper who was a phony (fraudulent credentials) and sent hundreds to prison in W VA., Hawaii and Texas.  In that case Zain had an agenda and what he did was malicious and deliberately designed to produce a living.  In the IU case, though not deliberate they did depend upon funding from the state for operations and possibly if they returned an accurate and low percentage of positives they might have lost their contract years ago.  In either case, the outcome was the same - but in this instant version, it is thousands who may have been harmed by the actions of IU SoM.

        "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled" http://piecp-violations.com/

        by Bob Sloan on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 07:12:55 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  Thank you for this information. (3+ / 0-)

    ALEC has way too strong of a grip on Indiana. It's such a shame that so many people have suffered from this particular injustice.

    •  Ryan - appreciate your knowledge about ALEC (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Ryan in Indy

      and their influence here in Indy.  I see from your tagline that you're running for office and oppose those lawmakers with ALEC ties and authority (Bosma in particular).  Glad to offer any help I can to your campaign, Ryan.  If you would like a presentation on ALEC and their "Cabal" on your behalf at an event, let me know...I'm right here and covered in research :)

      "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled" http://piecp-violations.com/

      by Bob Sloan on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 07:18:23 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  That makes it much worse! What in the world is (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Iron Spider

      going on here?! I mean if there is such laxity in factual determinations of guilt and a willingness to convict on the least of evidence, what does that say about our freedoms?  Are we now at the mercy of faux science if accused of a crime? And the mercy of a jury who believes completely  in the "facts" presented by the state and willing to convict blindly?  Geez... I knew about Zain and Sandra Anderson, celebrated trainer and handler of cadaver-sniffing dogs - but not two of the articles you link to above.  Thanks for providing - makes the issue of much more importance and possibly establishes a pattern that had not been fully exploited previously.

      "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled" http://piecp-violations.com/

      by Bob Sloan on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 07:31:33 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  consider this: 70% of convictions are by plea (0+ / 0-)

        bargain while 70% of all jury trials end in convictions with some jurisdictions reporting annual jury trial frequencies of 0% to 2%.  So of every 100 defendants, 70 plea bargain (cynical lack of faith in the system?) and of the 30 that go to trial, 21 are convicted, which means that if you are arrested for a crime, you have a 9% chance of going free.

        Now factor in Project Innocence estimate that 10% of those incarcerated are innocent of the crime for which they are convicted and serving time...................

        It appears our jury system is worse than a coin flip................  

        •  That it is. F. Lee Bailey once published a book (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          entlord

          titled "Never Plead Guilty" and his established premise is that under the US Justice system the prosecutors and courts have become dependent upon the cooperation of defendants to "cop pleas".  Bailey offers that if every defendant plead not guilty and demanded a jury trial or trial by the court, more than 60% of all prosecuted cases would end in dismissal as the system is incapable of meeting the deadlines proscribed by our justice system rules.  Especially if the speedy trial rule is invoked.

          This truly would force prosecutors to concentrate on cases that need prosecuting and dismissing those they have little evidence on or chance of winning.  Sadly the PD's have begun to rely upon the plea arrangement to reduce their time on cases and have become complacent with real lawyering.

          "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled" http://piecp-violations.com/

          by Bob Sloan on Wed Feb 29, 2012 at 08:09:51 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

  •  The real shocker (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Calamity Jean, Iron Spider

    is that anyone is bothering to test anyone for marijuana use.

    It's a waste of everyone's time at best, and it destroys lives and tears apart families at worst.

    They might as well test for coffee. It's about as dangerous as marijuana.

    In 2012 (or any year), who in the hell really believes that people should be put into cages for smoking weed? And who puts these people into power?

    It is fucking disgusting, revolting, stomach-churning.

    Sick little power hungry piece of shit sadistic destroyers of lives.

    Paternity rules, fraternity drools. - Rick Santorum (paraphrased)

    by VictorLaszlo on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 05:45:54 PM PST

    •  Vote and vote smart is all the advice I can (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      VictorLaszlo, Calamity Jean

      provide.  Until the "tough on crime" and "Marijuana is a gateway drug" crowd are booted from office there will be no relaxation of these policies and repeal of the harmful drug laws - that are more harmful than the drugs themselves.

      Sadly unless legalization is on the ballots many will not turn out to vote.  This allows politicians to slide by for another term and continue to oppose legalization.  Voters should treat each local, state and national election as if their very lives depended upon the outcome - because in fact it does.

      "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled" http://piecp-violations.com/

      by Bob Sloan on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 07:36:02 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Who pays? Everybody pays directly and indirectly. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Calamity Jean

    "..tinfoil hats have become a common, if not mandatory, G.O.P. fashion accessory." Paul Krugman, New York Times Op-Ed, 2/12/2012

    by LamontCranston on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 06:11:16 PM PST

    •  The inmate pays in loss of freedom, the taxpayer (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Calamity Jean

      in costs of court, investigation and incarcerating an offender and for subsequent appeals.  In the instant case they'll also be paying for any civil actions and damage awards that arise because of these manipulations.

      I probably should have asked who profited from such a travesty - but then again, it would be the same set of characters, investors and companies...

      "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled" http://piecp-violations.com/

      by Bob Sloan on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 07:50:31 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Any person, every person charged with every (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Bob Sloan, Eric Nelson, Calamity Jean

    crime, any crime, immediately comes face to face with a grime reality. If you have a ton of money to throw at your defense, there is a decent chance for acquital, even for the guilty. Barring that, the odds are stacked sky high against you, even if innocent. And so then the reality of plea bargaining intrudes, with the wealthy and the financially challenged again facing diametrically differing realities. Wealthy guilty defendants commonly get more favorable plea offers than innocent poor defendants do. And in both circumstances (as in every circumstance in this desperate dance) there is a "defense lawyer" advising that "no one can ever guarantee what a jury will do and pleading will get you X, and going to trial might get you Y". Where X is relatively manageable (meaning generally as manageable as these sorts of things can ever be), and Y represents the most horrific "parade of horribles" that can (under the circumstances) even be conceived of. And, of course, with the obligatory recommendation of "it's your choice, but my advice is to take the deal".  

    Often where the most fair and humane dispensation of justice originates from is the prosecutor committed to the oath sworn upon hiring, and viewing a file that has "reasonable doubt" written all over it. And, at a minimum, it was exactly this maximally vital stage of the standard process that was "murdered" in Indiana over the course of an unmeasureably large number of years.

    (Excellent work, sir, excellent work!)

    There can be no protection locally if we're content to ignore the fact that there are no controls globally.

    by oldpotsmuggler on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 07:19:53 PM PST

    •  Thanks back and excellent comment on point and (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Eric Nelson, Calamity Jean

      relative to the discussion as always OPS.  When we look at prosecutors - most of whom are seeking statistics of successful convictions in pursuit of higher office - this plays right upon their egos and agenda.  Whether deliberate or by chance this kind of screw-up benefits them and those who profit off of imprisoning someone.

      I've often spoken at events and voiced the opinion that to the corporations we have become taxpayer ATM's and to politicians we're grist for the prison mills.  We have become commodified - a commodity such as a stock that is to be used as sureties, or retain a cash value as prisoner, prison worker or to provide a case load for probation and parole officers job security.  More and more the world is becoming one big revolving door circling around incarceration.  Today from construction to reentry, incarceration through parole or probation, someone in many capacities makes a living off of criminal justice, incarceration or a related peripheral.

      Sad and sick state of affairs - and also this diary presents us with a glaring look into the tenuous nature of our freedoms and how easily it can be taken from us without due process.  This is not the America I grew up in and want my children and their children to grow up in...

      "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled" http://piecp-violations.com/

      by Bob Sloan on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 07:47:58 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  I feel that you and I both know how much of this (0+ / 0-)

        shit we could clear out if we could just leaglize and issue blanket amnesty.

        It's never going to happen, though.

        See you in Salt Lake?

        There can be no protection locally if we're content to ignore the fact that there are no controls globally.

        by oldpotsmuggler on Tue Feb 28, 2012 at 09:08:51 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site