Skip to main content

The people excusing Rush Limbaugh as a satirist are missing two crucial differences between true satire and playground-bully mockery: irony and justice.

Irony provides the essential distance that marks comedy from cruelty. It's been said that comedy is tragedy sped up and exaggerated to the scope of farce, but if Limbaugh truly is a comedian, his jokes fall flat from lack of irony and justice in scope. Satire mocks the powerful from below; if a powerful person mocks someone less powerful, he's simply being an asshole.

Making fun of physical handicaps (as Limbaugh has done) is the lowest form of comedy unless there's ironic inversion and justice involved. Otherwise, it's like pulling wings off flies to get a laugh. Stephen Hawking can make a cripple joke because he's clearly handicapped himself. When Jewish satirist Sasha Barton Cohen gets a roomful of people to sing "Throw the Jew Down the Well," he's employing satirical irony; Limbaugh would not get the same kind of license to make an identical "joke" unless he was singing about killing fat pill-popping bigots. Now, if Rush was a liberal assuming an exaggerated right-wing persona (like Stephen Colbert), he'd be using satirical irony.  If Limbaugh is anything other than what he pretends to be, however, he's been hiding that fact for over 20 years.

Meanwhile, the principle of justice marks another line between satire and cruelty. Female satirist Sarah Silverman can get away with making rape jokes (barely...) because she's clearly not a rapist. When overtly masculine Andrew Dice Clay made them, even through his exaggerated persona, such "jokes" became a career-limiting move. People can laugh when a mouse gives an eagle the finger; if the eagle gives the finger to the mouse, there might be a brief laugh of pure shock (like when George Carlin made rape jokes about Porky Pig raping Elmer Fudd... yet another ironic inversion). If the eagle continues to eat the mouse afterward, however, it takes a hard-hearted person to continue laughing.

At the beginning of his career,  Rush did have some valid targets, and he applied a bit of wit to them. His "feminazi" rants held some justifiable sting in the early '90s, when college campuses were imposing "speech codes" and N.O.W. was staging book-burnings for American Psycho. (A book whose incredibly dark satire became more obvious when it was adapted by female filmmakers.) Using the "Born Free" theme to counteract the spotted owl controversy was sort of amusing at the time... provided you didn't think too hard about how that controversy revolved around the idea of wiping out a whole species for profit. Thing is, Rush has since become the eagle [1], and yet can't still can't resist the impulse to give a mouse the finger as he eats her. And when the powerful mock the powerless, that's not satire - it's just cruelty.

While it's true that straightforward mockery CAN be an element of satire, that's a clumsy, short-lived approach. (cf. Andrew Dice Clay) Obviously, the schoolyard bully has an audience who laughs when he pulls down an honor student's pants... but really, how many of them are still laughing when they've grown to adulthood, and how "adult" do we find such people once high school ends?

Limbaugh has since presented a half-hearted apology [2], claiming the satirist's cloak of protection. "For over 20 years," he stated, "I have illustrated the absurd with absurdity." The target of his absurdity, however, reveals the truth of Rush's position: rather than comment on the absurdity of a lone female finally being "allowed" to testify before an all-male congressional committee regarding female contraception [3], he chose to slut-shame women who use contraception. But when even the eagle - most ironically, one who's been caught having his own issues with drugs and legalities - makes such admissions, it's worth asking where the true absurdities within the social issues lie.

As for a career defined by pulling the wings off of flies to get a laugh, it's a poor comedian who does so just to show why insects shouldn't aspire to fly.

1 - As a prosperous straight American white male of supposedly Christian convictions, Rush has really ALWAYS been the eagle; it's easy to understand, though, how his audience felt persecuted by the likes of Molly Yard and Andrea Dworkin, regardless of who really held the power in society as a whole.  

2 - ...part of which is belied by the actual transcripts of his show.

3 - At a time of staggering economic woes and severe international strife, Congress has nothing better to do?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site