Skip to main content

Excerpt from Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech at AIPAC on March 5, 2012:

If Iran gets nuclear weapons, this would set off a mad dash by Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, and others to acquire nuclear weapons of their own. The world’s most volatile region would become a nuclear tinderbox waiting to go off.

Turkey has (along with Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, and all of the other countries in Western Asia and Northern Africa - except Israel) signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and Turkey meets all of the requirements of this treaty.

Israel has not and does not.

There have been dozens of U.S. nuclear weapons in Turkey for about half a century and Turkey lived under the real threat of being a primary target of a possible USSR nuclear attack for decades.

Turkey carried that burden without getting its knickers in a twist or resorting to reckless behavior that threatened to start a major war in the region or damaged the world’s economies.

Turkey, unlike Israel, has also never made a secret mad dash to build scores (or hundreds) of nuclear bombs which would make the world’s most volatile region a nuclear tinderbox waiting to go off.

Prime Minister Netanyahu should leave Turkey out of his own latest mad dash - recklessly trying to provoke another contrived war and drag the U.S. into it.

... and leave Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and others out of it, too.

- * - * -

It is interesting to note that the level of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s rhetoric about Iran’s alleged nuclear programs has increased as the time for the UN-sponsored conference on establishing a Middle East Nuclear Weapon Free Zone approaches.

The May, 2010 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference - which takes place every five years – called for a conference to be held in 2012 to establish a nuclear weapon free Middle East and for the conference to be attended by all States in the region.

In October, 2011 Jaakko Laajava, Finland's Under-Secretary of State, was appointed by the UN as the facilitator for the conference, and it is reported that all States in the Middle East have agreed to attend the conference which will be in Finland later this year.

In the 2010 NPT Review Conference’s report Israel was singled out many times for it’s not having signed the NPT, and the U.S. reaction to the report was mixed.

From the statement by the National Security Advisor, General James L. Jones, on the Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference:

...

Despite our agreement to the final document, we have serious reservations about one aspect of the Middle East resolution it contains. The final document includes an agreement to hold a regional conference in 2012 to discuss issues relevant to a Middle East zone free of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and their delivery systems. The United States has long supported such a zone, although our view is that a comprehensive and durable peace in the region and full compliance by all regional states with their arms control and nonproliferation obligations are essential precursors for its establishment.

...

The United States will not permit a conference or actions that could jeopardize Israel’s national security. We will not accept any approach that singles out Israel or sets unrealistic expectations.

...

It is the position of the U.S. and Israel that a peace agreement must be reached before a Middle East Nuclear Weapon Free Zone can be established.

Note: The Middle East is defined in the report to include Algeria, Bahrain, the Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, the United Arab Emirates, and Yemen.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site