Skip to main content

Time for another installment of how effective of a Democratic map can I draw.  This one involves Maryland, which I had been holding off on because there have been so many excellent and actually realistic 7-1 and 8-0 maps that were better than the real thing.  Still, I figured I'd try my hand at both.  The goal was first and foremost to maximize Democratic performance in the districts, but I also tried to give incumbent Democrats a seat they would be okay with.  In the 7-1 map all Dem seats are at least D+10 and in the 8-0 map all the seats are at least 60% Obama.  Both maps also use water contiguity across the Chesapeake.

Version 1: 7-1


Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

The 1st district becomes a right-angle GOP vote sink as it does under the real map.  This one though contains the panhandle as well as much of the eastern shore.  I packed it even further to a bloody red R+19, which will be safe for even Andy Harris.

The 2nd district combines the home bases of both Dutch Ruppersberger and John Sarbanes, but I imagine one of them, most likely Sarbanes, would run in the 3rd.  The district, based in northern Baltimore and Baltimore County, becomes several points more Democratic and would be safe regardless of who wins the primary.

The 3rd district shifts southward and now gains a small sliver of Prince George's County and becomes a lot more Democratic.  Sarbanes would probably run here as he represents some of the district already and he would avoid a primary with Ruppersberger.  He would definitely not like this district in the primary though, but it would help introduce him to more of the state for his likely future statewide run.

The 4th district is one of the two VRA districts and is based in heavily black Prince George's.  Instead of meandering into Montgomery though, it now is used to crack Anne Arundel and the eastern shore, dropping down to 69% Obama in the process but still 50% black.

The 5th district is pretty much the exact same as before.  Hoyer drops some conservative leaning territory, including his nominal home of Mechanicsville, and gains more of Anne Arundel.  Safe for Hoyer and the Dem who succeeds him.

The 6th district is practically a new seat.  No longer dominated by the panhandle and Carroll County, it takes in heavily Democratic parts of Montgomery and Howard counties, as well as Frederick.  Barlett wouldn't stand a chance here and either would opt for a primary against Harris in the 1st, or more likely just retire.

The 7th is unpacked substantially by dropping the whiter portions of Baltimore and Howard County in exchange for the conservative parts of Baltimore County and Frederick County, among others.  It is unpacked to just under 67% Obama, but still 50% black and Cummings will have no problems.

The 8th is still based in Montgomery County, but now adds Hagerstown and parts of Frederick County to unpack it slightly.  It is still ridiculously Democratic and Van Hollen will be safe.

The result of this is that Democrats would win all 7 seats consistently instead of having to worry slightly about the 2nd, 3rd, and 6th under the real map.  Furthermore, every incumbent except John Sarbanes would likely be satisfied with their district, Donna Edwards' posturing aside (she's safe regardless...)

Version 2: 8-0


Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

As most DKErs who have done an 8-0 Maryland know, the name of this game is unpacking the VRA districts.  You'll notice that every single district is between 60% and 70% Obama, despite both VRA districts being 50% black.

The 1st district is essentially a new district.  It is no longer based primarily on the eastern shore, but instead in Baltimore and Baltimore County.  One of either Sarbanes or Ruppersberger might run here to avoid a primary, but it only contains a minority of their old territory. Hopefully they would have worked out who would have run in the 2nd though, since both seats are safe.

The 2nd district district is probably a better fit for Ruppersberger, but it now meanders all the way from Baltimore County, around Baltimore, around Columbia, and down to the DC suburbs in Prince George's County.  Safe for any Democrat, whether its Ruppersberger or Sarbanes.

The 3rd district probably contains more of Sarbanes territory so it wouldn't have surprised me if he ran here.  It now runs from Annapolis to Columbia, and also includes some of Prince George's to push it over 60% Obama and ensuring safety for Dems.

The 4th district is similarly used to crack the eastern shore under this map, but is now even slightly less Democratic at 68% Obama.  Still, it's 50% black and Donna Edwards would win the primary easily as she will in reality.

The 5th district is also pretty similar to the old version, but it now drops some of Prince George's County, although not College Park, to grab some of the more Democratic/whiter territory from the eastern shore to unpack it somewhat.  Still Hoyer would be quite safe as would his successor once he retires.

The 6th district is more along the lines of the actual version under this map, but is more like what Maryland Dems should have drawn.  It includes the entire panhandle and Hagerstown, but instead of keeping Frederick it takes in more of Montgomery County to push it over 60% Obama.  Bartlett would be screwed and Rob Garagiola would easily win here.

The 7th district is also unpacked even more than in the 7-1 map.  It still keeps the black core of Baltimore, but now adds those comically dedicated racists in Carroll County, as well as more conservative areas along the Pennsylvania border.  It is now only 64% Obama despite being 50% black which is a fairly hard feat for a VRA seat outside of the deep south.  Cummings will be absolutely safe here.

The 8th is still based in the most Democratic parts of Montgomery County, but now includes Frederick and Westminster to unpack it from ridiculously safe to just safe for Van Hollen.

So there you have it, two maps that satisfy every incumbent other than Sarbanes that were much more effective than the actual map.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Why can't both sides agree (0+ / 0-)

    to cut District 1 into two.

    I live here, and am sadly a victim of District 1.

    Its the most logical idea.

    Let the Democrats in Baltimore county have competitive races, and let the eastern shore folk do what they must.

    And the the DCCC says our seat is too hard to win.

    Again, in 2008 Obama got 52%,  that clown Kratovil rode his coatails at 54%,  then went on and voted against the party, and against the maryland delegation on every vote.

    •  Wow (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      sawolf

      That 8-0 is really impressive.

      Like you say, the only problem is Sarbanes/Ruppersberger. It looks to me like the only district that is really a "white Baltimore" district is MD-01, and it is not really all that similar to either the current MD-02 or MD-03. MD-03 is basically a Howard/PG Dem district. It looks to me like MD-02 is sort of a Baltimore Republicans + DC suburbs district. How would a Democratic primary between a Baltimore Dem and a DC suburbs Dem look there?

      •  Not quite sure, but I think in either case (0+ / 0-)

        Sarbanes and Ruppersberger would get enough establishment support and fundraising power to fend off primary challenges.  They still would dislike having a largely new district though.  It's pretty much impossible to let them keep their hometowns and maximize Dem performance though.  It could be done if I could split precincts left and right like the real map does, but otherwise there are a couple of choke points with the 4th and 7th.

    •  Obama only got 40% in the 1st in 2008 (0+ / 0-)

      yet Kratovil still managed to eke out a win with 49%, so I can't blame him for voting cautiously.  Still, Democrats could have easily made the 1st more Democratic, enough so that Andy Harris would have lost to Kratovil in a rematch and Kratovil could have taken more liberal stances.

      Governor O'Malley proposed splitting the shore to yield 8 seats, but Democrats in Prince George's county and the Baltimore area didn't want to risk their own power bases being diluted, so we got the current 7-1 map.

      •  That is the most angering part. (0+ / 0-)

        At a time when we need to squeeze out every House seat we can to offset unfavorable maps in other states, those fools you talked about couldn't take one for the team.

        Farm boy who hit the city to go to college, WI-03 (home, voting), WI-02 (college), -7.88, -4.26, One in ONE MILLION that recalled Scott Walker!!!!

        by WisJohn on Wed Mar 07, 2012 at 12:13:09 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  15 percent of the population of the new (0+ / 0-)

    8th district is in Carroll County, and I'm in that new district.

    It will be a great relief to be represented by Van Hollen instead of Bartlett.

    Amazing how they redid the 1st district.  It comprises much or all of 11 out of the state's 23 counties, if I counted right.  Trust me that the lower part of the eastern shore has little to do with the northern and most western parts of Carroll County.

    •  These are only hypothetical maps (0+ / 0-)

      you can find all of the actual maps here.

    •  Under the real map (0+ / 0-)

      I'd say that the new 1st includes much or all of 10 counties (most of Harford and all of the 9 ES counties from Cecil down to Worcester.)  It only includes a relatively small portion, population-wise, of Baltimore County, and the majority of Carroll will now be in the 8th, swapped out of the 6th district (as was about half of Frederick County) to turn the 6th Democratic.  

      And there isn't really much consistency between the different parts of the redrawn 1st other than that they usually vote Republican, obviously to create a vote sink while making everything else Democratic.  (There's even greater dissimilarity between different parts of the Garrett-to-Worcester vote sink in the 7-1 fantasy map above.)

      36, MD-8 (MD-6 after 2012) resident, NOVA raised, Euro/Anglophile Democrat

      by Mike in MD on Wed Mar 07, 2012 at 01:52:30 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  This is amazing (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    sawolf

    It's totally horrific and disgusting, of course. But goddamn, son.

    I love the head-explosion factor of stuffing Kent Island and parts of the Eastern Shore proper into Rep. Edwards's VRA district.

    Democrat, OR-01 native, Swingnut for life, and keeper of the DKE glossary.

    by SaoMagnifico on Thu Mar 08, 2012 at 09:06:18 PM PST

    •  Thanks, I was just amazed that it was possible (0+ / 0-)

      to make every district over 60% Obama.  The VRA districts were able to be unpacked like those in Georgia or South Carolina could.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site