Skip to main content

My local Congressional race has a hotly contested Democratic primary next Tuesday to pick who will run against 1st term Republican incumbent, Bob Dold, in November. A deceptive, Karl Rove style attack ad (attack your opponent's strengths) came out of the Brad Schneider campaign today, and landed with the warm, moist, steaming, dull plop that signifies what it truly is.

Mr. Schneider is a favorite of austerity hawks like Minority Leader Steny Hoyer and Wall Street enablers like former IL Rep. Melissa Bean. Politically, Schneider is basically a moderate Republican, or would be if the species hadn't gone extinct. He is pro choice, somewhat tolerant of reasonable regulations, and willing to let Bush's tax cuts for the top earners expire. He is wealthy, partly self funded and otherwise financially supported by rather small numbers of rather large donors.  

Mr. Schneider is not so pro-choice that he will withhold his support from rabidly anti-choice Republicans if he deems them sufficiently pro-Israel, including Republicans like Utah Senator Robert Bennett, Nebraska Senator Mike Johanns, Michigan Congressman Mike Rogers and Minnesota Congressman Mark Kennedy. Mr. Schneider is also not sufficiently a Democrat to always support Democrats in local elections, having once pulled a Republican primary ballot to vote for a "friend".  Mr. Sheyman has been pointing out these facts, all of which are completely true, to the voters. Having no defense on the facts, Mr. Schneider now pounds on the table and shouts "Liar!", in this new TV ad:  

Here is a transcript:

Who is Ilya Sheyman?

He's funded by out of state special interests.

He can't win on his record, so he's spreading lies about true progressive Brad Schneider.

Attacks so absurd that the Tribune called them bogus.

Democrat Brad Schneider.  Supported by Melissa Bean, Julio Hamos and Susan Garrett for being pro choice.

Endorsed by the Daily Herald and the Tribue.  

Show Sheyman and his allies we don't like being lied to.  

Let's parse this ad, starting with the key, featured word, "bogus". Please continue reading.

The Chicago Tribune, a Republican paper, did indeed endorse Mr. Schneider and, in so doing did use the word, "bogus". But the Tribune did not use the word in it's usual meaning, signifying falsehood, as Mr. Schneider's new ad uses it. What the Tribune really said was that they thought it unfair of Mr. Sheyman to call out his opponent for the contribution record because the Tribune's editors think its OK for Democrats to support Republicans.

He's taken some heat for donating to some of Republican Mark Kirk's congressional campaigns, but this is a bogus complaint. It's a testament to Schneider's independence that on other occasions he contributed to Kirk's opponents. Federal Election Commission records suggest Schneider has found common ground with a wide range of candidates — Nancy Pelosi, anyone? — just like the voters he'd represent.
The Tribune never suggested that Mr. Schneider hasn't donated and voted exactly as Mr. Sheyman has reported. The Tribune said nothing about anybody lying about anything.  This is the ad's first Rovian attack to the strength of Mr. Sheyman's campaign calling Schneider out over his contribution history: When your opponent damages you with the truth, claim he is lying.

The Second Rove-style attack in this ad is designed to make one of the opponent's strengths look weak. This has acquired the rubric "swift boating". In this case it is the assertion "He's funded by out of state special interests." The germ of fact this comes from is actually an enormous Sheyman asset: 16000+ small donors (in your dreams, Brad), though they consist largely of out of district people. These are progressively minded Democrats all over the country who recognize the value of electing a more progressive Congress. The special interest part of Mr. Schneider's attack comes from the fact that many of those donors learned of Mr. Sheyman's campaign through, Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Democracy for America and other national progressive organizations. The support of these people and organizations represent an enormous strength and are testament to Mr. Sheyman's extraordinary organizational and campaigning skill in preparation for a tough General Election campaign.  Hence, the ad must attack Mr. Sheyman about this.

The third attack, "He can't run on his record" is a Rovian trifecta, simultaneously trying to falsely burnish Mr. Schneider's weak claim to be a lifelong progressive while at the same time attacking Mr. Sheyman's unblemished record as a committed, hard working, fighting progressive with a record of actual achievement for progressive causes. By contrast, Mr. Schneider has spent most of  his lifetime as a rising business careerist with a taste for, mostly, pro-Israel politics, a history of, mostly, supporting Democratic politicians, though never the most progressive choice, and a pattern of lending support to charitable organizations. All decent enough uses of Mr. Schneider's life, but nothing to justify his self branding as a lifelong progressive. The third horse in this trifecta is that this is an attack on Mr. Sheyman's undeniable youth. If elected, he will almost certainly be the youngest member of the 113th Congress. I call this the Whippersnapper Card. Mr. Schneider won't come right out address the candidates' relative ages. In true Rovian fashion, he leaves that to veiled allusions and whispering campaigns.  

When I already perceive Brad Schneider as a kind of weak tea, wannabe Republican-lite, it doesn't help that he starts campaigning like Karl Rove.  

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (6+ / 0-)

    Bumpersticker: GOP. Cheering Death. Booing Soldiers. Join Us.

    by LeftOfYou on Wed Mar 14, 2012 at 11:41:32 AM PDT

  •  Better Democrat's (2+ / 0-)

    in all levels of government is essential. I'm not a believer in electing blue dogs with the assumption that they are better then a Republican. We're told that that real Democrat's are not electable. I think the opposite is true. The problem seems to be that the Democratic Machine does nor put their support or money behind progressive candidates.

    This gives us false majorities and tips the scale to real Republicans. Thanks for working towards electing 'more better Dems'. I wish  Ilya Sheyman luck in his candidacy. Well written dairy. Is their anyplace we can donate to this candidate? Act Blue if he isn't there he should be. I no longer donate to the DNC or DSCC or any Democratic party machine national org. This time around I'm supporting individual 'better Dems'.

    Rovian politics are really out in full bloom this election cycle. I have never seen such a push to the extreme RW end. Positions called moderate these days are extreme. Especially as regards to  the bogus culture wars which I thought we won when we elected Democratic majorities starting in 2006.  With all the money flushed into the electoral system from CU it makes it harder then ever to elect better Democrat's.

    Thanks and while I do not live in IL. I also believe in the state by state, precinct by precinct concept of taking back our party. Howard Dean the candidate that got me back into activism and  grassroots politics was right. thanks for your work here.

    'I'm taking back my country and the vehicle I'm using is the Democratic party'. Howard Dean


    •  Howard Dean (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      shaharazade, CoyoteMarti

      Was here all weekend working for Ilya Sheyman.  Governor Dean knows what is at stake in this election.  

      They always say that out-front liberals can't get elected and that triangulation is the only way.  So few genuine progressives run for office it's hard to know.  

      Here, next week, we will know.  

      Bumpersticker: GOP. Cheering Death. Booing Soldiers. Join Us.

      by LeftOfYou on Wed Mar 14, 2012 at 12:52:23 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  He comes to OR (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        SoberGuy, LeftOfYou

        where I live a lot. He supports progressive at all levels of government  and is a hands on campaigner. My county is liberal and Democratic and he gets right down to even local party meetings. He really does work locally, as he says precinct by precinct.  

        Sometimes conventional wisdom like 'out front liberals can't get elected' is just another way to keep the power where it is. I really hope you do not place the outcome of this election as a test for this destructive CW. If Ilya Sheyman loses this primary it does not mean that out-front liberals can't win but that we have to find a way to counteract the Machines money and power locally.

        My state Rep. a young man who bucked the established  machine here won in 2010 a second term in the state house with 85% of the vote. When he first ran he was contesting the odds on Democratic winner who had money and the support of our county/national party. He won. Once in office he has worked hard for the people as a true progressive and as I said reelected with 85% of the vote. Do not lose heart we can and will if we just keep at it get better Dem's in office.            

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site