Skip to main content

Well, in reality I think it is worse today because the onslaught is so obvious.  The media has bombarded the public with poor teacher images, and there is not a single party to defend public education.  It's gone bipartisan.

In the 80s when Reagan's administration put out the report called Nation at Risk,  it caught teachers off guard.  I had then taught many years, and my fellow teachers and I had no idea why suddenly we were being talked about so negatively.  

The schools were not failing, there was no more crisis then than there is now.   Our students were learning, and they were scoring well on the national testing (ours for years was the Iowa Test of Basic Skills).  We were given our reports when we turned in our graded tests in stanine format.   These scores range from a low of 1 to a high of 9.  In our district our students were averaging 7 or 8, and in our school closer to 8.  

And yes, we graded them for hours.  They actually trusted us to do so.  

A few years ago I read an article by the late great Gerald Bracey about his interviewing and working with a VP of Sandia labs and one of the researchers on the study called "Perspective on Education In America", better known as the Sandia report.  It painted a different picture of our schools.  

Gerald Bracey 2007: Righting Wrongs

The report was not made public except in on obscure journal, and it is almost impossible to find online today.

The draft of The Sandia report closed with "There are many problems in American public schools, but there is no system-wide crisis." This was too positive for Ravitch, then assistant secretary education in the now defunct Office for Educational Research and Improvement, and Secretaries of Education and Energy, Lamar Alexander and James Watkins.

Almost precisely 17 years ago, Lee Bray, the Sandia vice president who had overseen the analysis flew up to Denver to show me the 156 page report. I had written an Education Week commentary arguing that the SAT decline had been much smaller than people thought (in fact, I was only riffing off the College Board's own panel which had produced On Further Examination). Bray said he had a lot of data on other indicators that corroborated my conclusions. He did.

Bob Huelskamp, one of the three engineers who authored the report returned some three months later to present it to me and some administrators in the Cherry Creek School District. I said we should take all of the data I had collected (substantially more by then than when I wrote the SAT piece) and the Sandia data and publish them all in one place. Huelskamp said, "We can't. We've got internal political problems."

Here is more:

Five years after Lee Bray retired, I called him. He was not enthusiastic about reopening old wounds, but when I asked him directly if the report had been suppressed he said, "Yes, it was definitely suppressed."

The Education Week article on The Sandia Report closed with the prediction that "Administration officials will use a lengthy review process to bury the report."

I started looking stuff up on this a day or so ago when I found out that links I had posted from Project Censored on the topic did not work.  I did a search there and found a little of the article, but with a caveat.

From Project Censored 1994:

The Sandia Report On Education: A Perfect Lesson In Censorship

Here is what was added at the end:

COMMENTS: Given the reception Project Censored received when we contacted Sandia National Laboratories for follow-up information (as we do with all original sources), we are hardly surprised that the media have not given the Sandia study more coverage. At best, we can say that Sandia doesn't want to discuss the study in any way.

When we contacted Bob Huelskamp, author of the Phi Delta Kappan article, he said that Sandia was not interested in replying to our questionnaire and that all further inquiries should be directed to a public information official by the name of Al Stotts. When Mr. Stotts didn't return our call of December 13, we tried again on the 16th and were told that he was on vacation until after New Year's day. But we were told to contact Jerry Langheim who would be able to help us. As it turned out, Mr. Langheim was out ill and wouldn't be back until after the first of the new year. But we were told to contact Rod Geer who would be able to help us.

We were finally able to reach Mr. Geer on December 17.

When I explained the Project to Geer, he responded, "We're not going to fill out the form and send it back to you.... It was published in the Phi Delta Kappan...and we consider ourselves finished with that business."

He also added: "We continue to support what the article says."

I also found more on this topic at a blog called On the Edge from 2003.  The writer was equally frustrated at the lack of information on this report.  The article references a book by David C. Berliner and Bruce J. Biddle titled The Manufactured Crisis: Myths, Fraud, and the Attack on America's Public Schools.

On the Edge. The Sandia report.

It explains in very clear detail about what standardized testing actually measures, and of course it deals with the ongoing propaganda by the far right in undermining public schools. One of the highlights is the authors' discussion of the suppression of the Sandia Report, excerpts from pages 165-168:

"This report, initially prepared in 1990 by officials of the Sandia National Laboratories, a component of the U.S. Department of Energy, documents a careful analysis of the status of American education. Major findings in The Sandia Report flatly contradicted claims about education that were then being peddled by President Bush in his administration, so the report was squelched.

...""But America is a wonderful land, where photocopying machines abound, and within a few months scores of draft copies of the report had been 'leaked' and were floating around the country.

...""The trouble with suppressing evidence is that it leads to policy errors that can ruin people's lives..."

A couple of years ago Edutopia blog summed up differences found in Reagan's report and in the Sandia report.  

Education at Risk: Fallout from a Flawed Report

"A Nation at Risk" (1983)

What the report claimed:

    American students are never first and frequently last academically compared to students in other industrialized nations.
    American student achievement declined dramatically after Russia launched Sputnik, and hit bottom in the early 1980s.
    SAT scores fell markedly between 1960 and 1980.
    Student achievement levels in science were declining steadily.
    Business and the military were spending millions on remedial education for new hires and recruits.

The Sandia Report (1990)

What was actually happening:

    Between 1975 and 1988, average SAT scores went up or held steady for every student subgroup.
    Between 1977 and 1988, math proficiency among seventeen-year-olds improved slightly for whites, notably for minorities.
    Between 1971 and 1988, reading skills among all student subgroups held steady or improved.
    Between 1977 and 1988, in science, the number of seventeen-year-olds at or above basic competency levels stayed the same or improved slightly.
    Between 1970 and 1988, the number of twenty-two-year-old Americans with bachelor degrees increased every year; the United States led all developed nations in 1988.

I have always felt that the education "reformers" could not succeed unless they made public schools and the teachers in those schools look bad.   They have done a good job of that, and there seems to be no one defending teachers and schools against the attacks.  It's not hard to guess who will win.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Never discussed in that Nation At Risk report (5+ / 0-)

    were the sections on things like teacher pay, things like class size, and teacher esteem.

    "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." --M. L. King "You can't fix stupid" --Ron White -6.00, -5.18

    by zenbassoon on Fri Mar 16, 2012 at 04:43:46 PM PDT

  •  Welcome 2 being a black person in Amer, u get (0+ / 0-)

    blamed 4 stuff.

    This is part of the plan 2 cOntinue the robbery. We're stupid and deserve crap because that's what has happened.

    St Ronnie = original tbag.

    The radical Republican party is the party of oppression, fear, loathing and above all more money and power for the people who robbed us.

    by a2nite on Fri Mar 16, 2012 at 05:13:01 PM PDT

  •  Who's Not Attacking Education Today? (0+ / 0-)

    Nobody important I can find.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Fri Mar 16, 2012 at 05:15:26 PM PDT

  •  We need to be clear... (0+ / 0-)

    ...about where Public Schools fail and where they succeed.

    Most Americans have pretty good schools. Most Americans are satisfied. Most Americans are also middle-class or upper-class.

    Our system does a fantastic job for kids who are not poor.  That is a success, and we should acknowledge it.

    Where we are failing is in poor communities. Most of this is because of socioeconomic factors that schools can't control. But some of it is because we need to do a better job.

    I live in the inner city where the schools are very bad. To hear anyone say that, "The schools were not failing, there was no more crisis then than there is now" makes me feel that they are very much disconnected from the reality that million of parents must face.

  •  The education crisis is a classic example ... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    floridagal, koseighty, brae70

    ... of people telling you that you have a problem and then trying to sell you the solution to that problem. Standardized testing is snake oil. At the end of the day, it's not about educational outcomes but about making the sale. They don't care about student learning but about taking a slice of the pie away from public unions and to private corporations.

  •  What we got from them was... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    floridagal

    teach to their test and forget content. SS teacher for 33 years retired. Is it any wonder that so many believe FOX NEWS.

    Plato's " The Cave" taught me to question reality.

    by CTDemoFarmer on Fri Mar 16, 2012 at 06:43:38 PM PDT

  •  If I remember right, Diane Ravitch glossed over (0+ / 0-)

    "Nation at risk" report in her latest book - not much criticism. A "centrist" take I suppose.

    "The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out”. - George Carlin

    by Funkygal on Sat Mar 17, 2012 at 03:27:27 AM PDT

  •  I was teaching then, as well. (0+ / 0-)

    I never suspected what I know for a fact now--that this was the beginning of a well-thought out and well-funded effort to make intellectual sheep out of Americans. The logical reasoning and inquiry that brought us to the moon (and resulted in most of the recent Nobels going to Americans) would no longer be allowed in K-8 schools. Instead, they would have to go back to basics. It had as much malice of forethought as Reagan's move to make crack cocaine (the drug of the poor) so much greater a crime than powdered cocaine (the drug of the rich) and deliberately seed Afro-American communities with drugs. (Yes, I know that's another diary, but I mention it to emphasize that long range voter surpression--mentally and legally--didn't begin with Carl Rove.)

    This would be a much different country if Reagan hadn't been a figurehead for some evil, scheming social engineers.

  •  Thank you so much for exposing this coverup! How (0+ / 0-)

    can we get this info. out to the media and general public?

    Everyone who reads this needs to pass this info. along. Maybe even write to your congress members.  The perception of teachers as failing can change if enough people get this information out there.

    Liberal (from Webster's Dictionary): tolerant of views differing from one's own; broad-minded

    by 50sbaby on Sat Mar 17, 2012 at 06:42:23 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site