Skip to main content

Author Jim Lair Beard is a restaurant server who works at the Andaz Hyatt hotel in West Hollywood, California. He is a union member and belongs to UNITE HERE Local 11. A slightly different version of this post appeared yesterday on Frying Pan News.

Am I allowed to write this? Is it against company rules? Before I tell you why I ask, let me explain a little about myself.

I’m a split personality of sorts. I’m a diligent employee. I’m always punctual in the RH restaurant where I work as a server at the Hyatt Andaz on Sunset in West Hollywood. I can describe every dish in detail. I enjoy getting to know my guests. I smile. I’m warm. I go above and beyond to offer them a great experience. I have many return guests. Some of them even bring me bottles of wine. I’ll refer to this first character as my "A" personality.

My "B" personality exists outside of the confines of Hyatt. Here are a few character identifiers: He’s a passionate union activist for UNITE HERE Local 11. He shows up extra early to the many rallies, strikes and pickets that are held outside of his place of employment. He uses bullhorns on guests to alert them to the ongoing boycott. He hands them leaflets. He’s stern. He’s serious. He wants them to hear both sides of the story.

A big part of Personality B’s life exists in front of a computer at home, reporting about workplace conditions. Personality B is a blogger and a labor writer.

It might be obvious, but Hyatt doesn’t care for Personality B all that much, or any employee who chooses to blog about Hyatt in a less than happy way. So is what I’m doing breaking their rules?

Avoid commenting on Hyatt or any Hyatt location…Hyatt may request that you temporarily confine your use of social media to matters unrelated to Hyatt if it determines this is necessary or advisable to ensure compliance with applicable laws or Hyatt policies.

This is according to the Hyatt handbook on social media policy dated from November 1, 2010. A more specific policy on blogging from 2008 even carries a veiled threat:

These guidelines apply even if an associate’s blog is anonymous or under another name. If an associate engages in such blogging, they should be aware that in appropriate circumstances Hyatt will take steps to determine their identity.

Luckily for me I don’t need to worry about having my identity uncovered, but I do worry about my fellow coworkers and others around the country who may second-guess their decisions to speak up about workplace injustices, because Hyatt might decide to “out” them.

One big story in the news lately has been about employers asking for applicants’ Facebook passwords during the interview process of landing a job. Geez, first they want your urine, now they want your Facebook password? Perhaps next time I apply for a job I should have my diary and a vial of blood ready to go just in case. 1984 has come and gone but it seems that the Orwellian world is here to stay --  except in my microcosmic world Big Brother is a company called Hyatt.

Last month, in a captive-audience meeting that seemed to me to be designed to slam my union without union representatives present, the general manager gave a PowerPoint presentation denouncing UNITE HERE Local 11. These types of meetings have historically been used to bust unions and get the employees to drink their employer’s propaganda in a setting where management claims can’t be rebutted. But while the captive meeting progressed, I noticed something . . .

The phrase “Refuses to pay workers what they’re worth” appeared on the huge screen for all to see. Our captive-audience meeting took place on February 17. An article that I had published for Truthdig appeared two days before -- with the exact same phrase. I’m not dumb and I’m not paranoid. Sure seems like a subtle clue that I was being watched. My only regret was that the GM didn’t give me proper credit for such a brilliant turn of phrase. Maybe next time he’ll link to my articles?

Hyatt has plunged itself into the national debate regarding overly broad corporate social media policies. Its policy is so disconcerting that the National Labor Relations Board’s General Counsel filed a national complaint to be heard in May. It’s clear to me that this is a free speech issue. Maybe the ACLU should get involved too.

A few folks -- including my own wife -- have asked me how I can get away with writing about Hyatt. The answer is current labor law and a good union attorney whom I am forever indebted to.

Maybe the bigger lesson in all of this is that if you want to have real free speech rights then join a union or push for labor organizing as a civil right. It seems only fair that if government cannot punish you for criticizing its officials, then the corporate officials who govern the workplace ought to be able to take a little criticism without throwing you out on the street.

And if Hyatt chooses to go the darker route of some of these other companies, and begins to ask for worker passwords to their Facebook accounts, I might be willing to agree to that -- if the CEO and the owners of the Hyatt cough up the passwords to all of their email and social media accounts. They should lay before us everything they communicate about on a day-to-day basis.


Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Man after my own heart (2+ / 0-)

    I love when I read about others who know what their rights are, and are not deterred by others who aren't as knowledgeable in those areas.  It's probably why I get such a kick out of Wisconsin State Legislator Mark Pocan.  He smiles in the face of tyranny, and bows to nobody.

    And you raise a good point about unions.  When I was a member of U.P.I.U Local 148, I wrote an editorial piece in our union paper about one of the supervisors we had in our plant.  I called the supervisor an autocratic Hitler-like leader.  Well, after the supv. saw this letter, he flew off the handle, and wanted me fired.  

    Some of my union leadership pulled me in to a meeting when I came in to work that afternoon, and told me that they probably wouldn't be able to save my job because of slandering a supervisor.  When I grabbed a copy of the paper and asked them to show me where the supervisors name was in the editorial, they all looked at me dumbfounded.  As I walked out, I reminded them that I paid union dues and was a union member, and that the supervisor didn't pay union dues, and wasn't a union member.  I think they got my point.

  •  Add a Labor tag, please (3+ / 0-)

    I almost missed this post, which would have been sad. Next time, would you please add a Labor tag?

    Workers are so confused about what is, and is not, protected free speech. Your point is crucial and widely misunderstood: free speech rights only mean we have the right to free speech when engaging with the government and union protection is the only protection that expands our right to speak freely, since we have a contract that says we can only be fired or disciplined for breaking specific work rules.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site