Skip to main content

Mitt Romney measures his ...
How much does Mitt Romney care about ethical violations by his advisers? (Brian Snyder/Reuters)
Mitt Romney still has no comment on the fact that one of his labor advisers, Peter Schaumber, allegedly received leaks from a National Labor Relations Board member, and the AFL-CIO is calling on him to remove Schaumber from his campaign.

A report from the NLRB's inspector general found that current board member Terence Flynn passed confidential information to two former NLRB members, including Peter Schaumber. That information mostly benefited Schaumber's private business as he represented clients with cases before the labor board, but may also have helped fuel Mitt Romney's attacks on it.

Having been a member of the NLRB, Schaumber absolutely knows what is supposed to remain confidential and what constitutes a breach—he knew his actions in taking Flynn's information were unethical. This man is one of the chairs of Romney's Labor Policy Advisory Group, in a campaign in which Romney's attacks on unions and the National Labor Relations Board and calls for major labor law overhauls in favor of corporations have repeatedly taken center stage.

Is Mitt Romney's war on the National Labor Relations Board so extreme that he welcomes someone on his campaign who knowingly participated in leaks of confidential information about the board? If Romney values basic ethical standards, he needs to renounce Schaumber's actions and remove him from his campaign position.

Add your name to the petition calling on Romney to fire Peter Schaumber and condemn his ethics violations.

Originally posted to Daily Kos Labor on Fri Mar 30, 2012 at 09:12 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Wouldn't they have known? (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Amber6541, happymisanthropy

    Terence Flynn was Schaumber's lawyer or something, right? Wouldn't the NLRB have known that when they accepted him onto the Board? Maybe there's a sort of old boys' club going on where former Board members get the benefit of their association with the Board?

    I would be very surprised if there was a true expectation on the part of Flynn, Schaumber or the NLRB that the Board meetings would be kept confidential.

    To them, this is probably a situation of "what did you expect? this is how it works."

  •  Obama appointed Terence Flynn (0+ / 0-)

    He owes us an explanation and an apology.

    Can he undo this appointment?  Can he get rid of the guy?  Has he learned anything at all about the failure of "centrism"?

    In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock. Thomas Jefferson

    by Betty Pinson on Sat Mar 31, 2012 at 08:10:29 AM PDT

    •  normal practice to appoint.... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      It is normal practice for the President to make NLRB appointments on a three to two partisan split, that is, three members of his own party and two members of the opposing party. This has been the practice for many years and has some basis in law (although I cannot cite the precise statute).

      He chose Flynn as a Republican appointee because he was non-controversial either to Dems or Reps. Apparently, it was a bad choice.

      And no, he cannot withdraw his recess appointment. Unless Flynn resigns, he will serve in the post till his recess appointment expires. Of course, Obama could renominanate him at that time....

      •  Perhaps the WH should focus (0+ / 0-)

        on vetting these Republican appointments more thoroughly and holding them to a higher standard than their party affiliation.

        Yes, Romney's campaign staffer should resign, but we should also pressure the WH to use more common sense when choosing Republicans to fill important vacancies. We should also expect them to go above and beyond the call of duty to ensure the NLRB is able to function properly until Flynn is gone.

        In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock. Thomas Jefferson

        by Betty Pinson on Sat Mar 31, 2012 at 08:43:09 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Yes, poor choice.... (0+ / 0-)

          Yes, Flynn was a poor choice, and was made with the obvious tactical calculation that the Republicans in the Senate would not/could not oppose him, and that he would wind up as a recess appointee in any event.

          It is a good example of the cynicism and uber-partisanship that both the White House and the Senate have been treating NLRB appointments.

          And Schaumber is not a "staffer" to be hired or fired. He is an "advisor ' and a fundraiser not on the campaign payroll.

  •  Get the ball rolling (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    JML9999, Amber6541

    Get rid of Flynn.  As long as he's there Romney can stonewall.

  •  Mitt Romney + Ethics? (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    JML9999, Amber6541, parsonsbeach, TKO333

    Bwahahahahahahaha heh.

    Sorry,jut cant wrap my head around that one.

    "Another world is not only possible, she is on her way. On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing." Arundhati Roy

    by LaFeminista on Sat Mar 31, 2012 at 08:16:27 AM PDT

    •  My thoughts exactly! (0+ / 0-)

      Rethuglicans and ethics? Surely you jest.

      What you beat me to was:



      "Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Matthew 5:11

      by parsonsbeach on Sat Mar 31, 2012 at 09:46:41 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Ethical standards are for the masses. Mitt Romney (7+ / 0-)

    is above all that...he's running for office, for pete's sake.

    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

    by darthstar on Sat Mar 31, 2012 at 08:17:45 AM PDT

  •  This is a good year to remind voters of (5+ / 0-)

    the history of convictions, indictments, and investigations among members of Ronald Reagan's administration - 138 to be exact.

    President Clinton's white house only racked up ten... including the $60 million Whitewater investigation (which no indictiments) and the President's impeachment for perjury. Of the other eight,  all but two were investigations that cleared the suspect of wrongdoing.

    Have you noticed?
    Politicians who promise LESS government
    only deliver BAD government.

    by jjohnjj on Sat Mar 31, 2012 at 08:18:18 AM PDT

  •  every time I see that picture (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Amber6541, happymisanthropy

    I want to suggest a title.

    I've long ago stopped expecting ethical behavior from the Romney campaign.

    The man has no shame. Best you could do is get him to promise to fire him, and then he will promptly promise to hire him since the man cannot remain on one side of any issue for very long.

    I think, Therefore I am, ...A Democrat

    by Patriot4peace on Sat Mar 31, 2012 at 08:21:44 AM PDT

  •  Romney is never going to fire him, no matter (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    how many people sign a petition.  Just not going to happen.

  •  Nit to pick: petitions are for official business (0+ / 0-)

    Romney has no official position with a government or quasi-government authority. You do not petition in these circumstances; what is appropriate to do is to write a letter and add your name as a co-signer.

    The right to petition is a very formalized right and we should not be so loose with it as to cheapen it.

    If anything, "petitioning" Romney artificially elevates him as if he were anything but a private citizen. He is not in a position of trust, is not an elected official, so does not deserve a petition.

    Just because you have an internet site that makes it easy to make a "petition" does not mean this is the proper form for a complaint.

    Some people are intolerant, and I CAN'T STAND people like that. -- Tom Lehrer

    by TheCrank on Sat Mar 31, 2012 at 09:00:36 AM PDT

  •  "If Romney values basic ethical standards..." (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    No, no comment, really.

  •  Peter Schaumber served as one of the two members (0+ / 0-)

    on the NLRB, from 2007-2009. Mr. Schaumber was the GOP rep, who served with Wilma Liebman, the former chairperson of the NLRB.  Ms. Liebman and Mr. Schaumber were the only two  members on the Board, yet between them they decided on 600 cases. So I am watching this very closely.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site