Apropos of a TeeVee show on the Science Channel, the content here on this fine website and the larger political context I would like to offer a modest proposal vis a vis the 'War on Women', a quid pro quo, a veritable cogito ergo summum bonum.......... or not, you decide.
Okey dokey (Oaky doaky?) then let us stipulate first that the principle and godly purpose of Viagra is to promote, ultimately, male climax. If it were simply to induce erection or other follow-on activities short of O then, well, that would be bad because as we are all very well informed by those proposing trans vaginal ultrasound, non-coverage of birth control ad nauseum that sex is for procreation within the bounds of one and only one of the many possible variations of marriage as authorized and supervised by Divine Authority.
Given (1) then that many if not all of these same Lawgivers are certainly users of Viagra, some of that usage no doubt funded by their insurance policies and are almost to a Man declaimers of their own virtue and Fair and Balanced HUGELY moral principles.
And (2) then that some of these Fine and Godly Men are married to Lovely and Talented Women and that some of these women, being, well, female and these women's female daughterse as well are also subject to some doubt regarding the applicability of some aspects of Divinely Ordained Authority to their own lives here on earth.
And (3) that some significant number of these women of voting age and inclination may perceive that they too have a paucity of Orgasm in their own lives or simply see this as a Fair and Balanced Proposal might therefore be as pleased as their husbands are to have access to technological and insurance subsidized Orgasm.
And (4) that such a technology is currently available to Women:
Call him Dr. Orgasmatron
Therefore, I propose that the Democratic Party adopt as a principle to promote Fair and Balanced Insurance coverage without consideration of gender that V=O; Viagra = Orgasmatron. In the homespun patois of our earstwhile antagonists, what's Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander.
No matter what we say or do they will revile us so why not play Hard Ball, so to speak, Driving a Wedge in fine Ailes tradition to split the female Republican voting block advancing a fissure that they themselves began under Divine Guidance. I remember Rush decrying the fact that Barak would soon be coming for their Women, telling his truth again, among their greatest fears. Opening that closet would certainly stir up some dust, let in some fresh air, shine some light, let out the captives..........and provoke death threats galore no doubt. All excellent political theater.
Ahem......