Skip to main content

The Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday for and against Arizona’s two-year old immigration law known as SB1070.  SB1070 was the pioneer in anti-immigrant legislation that gave seed to 36 other states introducing similar legislation and 5 passing laws modeled on it.

Four specific provisions of the Arizona law are before the Supreme Court with a decision due in June.

They include a requirement that police determine immigration status of a person they stop, criminalizing immigrants who seek or accept work or don’t carry their visas, and allowing police to arrest individuals without a warrant if they are ‘a deportable’ immigrant.

The loose translation of this is:  if you look brown and smell like you came from Mexico get out and leave us a couple of bucks in fines for our troubles.
The issue before the court boils down to state versus federal power something too lofty for many to understand, what was clearly understood was this law targeted brown skinned people and Latino’s specifically, illegal or otherwise.

Latinos knew that the law was coming at a time when illegal immigration was at all time lows.  Latinos knew that the law was coming when deportations were at an all time high.  Most of all Latinos knew this legislation came when negative rhetoric about Latino immigrants were at record levels and the economy needed a scape goat.

The die was cast and the whispers were no longer silent – they don’t like us – Mexican’s get out.  SB1070 spawned an anti-Latino sentiment and nothing the Supreme Court decides will change that, they aren’t that powerful.

What about those Arizona Latinos that stayed behind because their family called this home even before the Mexican-American war of 1863, when Arizona was part of Mexico?  To quote George Lopez “We ain’t going nowhere!!”

However, all Latinos know that even if SB1070 is defeated there are other initiatives that have Latinos in the cross hairs like voter ID laws and a water-downed DREAM Act by Marco Rubio, for example.

For weary Arizona Latino’s regardless of the Supreme Court decision there is Sheriff Arpaio they might face one dark night, there is the ban on Mexican-American studies in high schools and Latino candidates banned from running for office if their English isn’t up to snuff.

What can this court really change when SB1070 changed so much forever?

Read more Estelle Gonzales Walgreen at Hispanically Speaking News

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  watching a documentary on NeoNazis and (0+ / 0-)

    Skinheads and other WP sorts.  While most anti-immigration groups deny any association with these admittedly racist groups, it is still interesting who shows up in the background of some of their meetings, for those with sharp eyes.

    Of course they say their meetings are open to everyone and just because someone has an "88" or "14" tat or other such tat does not reveal their true ideology...........

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site