Skip to main content

equal pay
Senate Democrats are planning to bring the Paycheck Fairness Act to a vote, Greg Sargent reports. The bill, which expands on the Equal Pay Act of 1963 to make it easier to address gender discrimination, was blocked by Republicans in 2010. Now Democrats will press the issue once again.

Obviously, Republicans are once again going to block fair pay. For Democrats, though, bringing the Paycheck Fairness Act up for a vote doesn't just put Republicans on the record against fair pay for women, it keeps the issue alive. You don't build support for a bill by letting it languish in obscurity for years and pulling it out when the stars miraculously line up.

That said, getting Republicans on the record is also a priority—and not just Senate Republicans. Mitt Romney's going to have a chance to go on the record about his support, or lack thereof, for equal pay for women in a concrete way. Romney has expressed general support for the broad concept of equity, but hasn't really wanted to go on the record about any specific bills, even the comparatively limited Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. So which will it be? Will Romney use whatever sway he has with Senate Republicans to get Paycheck Fairness a vote in hopes it'll help him with female voters, or will he add this to the long list of reasons for his polling deficit among women? (This is one of those questions that shouldn't be rhetorical, but probably is.)

Originally posted to Daily Kos Labor on Fri Apr 27, 2012 at 10:51 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site