Skip to main content

This one kinda slipped by us, five days ago. It's from a Fox interview of MB conducted by Greta van S.
Could be a biggie this fall in terms of conservative campaign rhetoric, if the mainstream media doesn't stamp it out:

    BACHMANN: ...there are elements in our party for social conservatives that need "Obama care" repealed because it means for the first time in our country, taxpayer-subsidized abortion. That's anathema.

Suppose her side succeeds in turning the issue of "access to health care for working families" into "support for abortion." If that happens, a lot people turn out to vote and "activize" in the campaign. And a lot more of those people who turn out to vote are pro-life, as opposed to pro-choice.

So Dems should be watching for that one this fall ("Obamacare=taxpayer subsidized abortions") and have a fact check and a crushing response ready to go. This framing of Obamacare is a winner for the right (like "Obamacare is government takeover of health care," and "the death panels.")

The context of Bachmann's claim is her endorsement of Mitt Romney. And once again, Bachmann's demagogy shows us our future, this summer. Question: how do you get evangelicals on board to support liberal Republican Mormon Romney, original implementer of Obamacare? Answer: You get those conservative evangelicals on board by telling them that Obama's the "abortion president."

They have the capability to do that, their target voters are already inclined to believe it. It doesn't matter that it's ultimately in the service of comparative liberal Mitt Romney. The leaders of the evangelical right turned out their crowd for liberal Republican John McCain, turn 'em out for McCain on a dime--after years of telling them that McCain was unacceptable in the White House.

Why did they do that? Well, despite their threats: I figure that the worst thing that can happen to the leaders of the American Christian right is that their voters stay home at election time. They now control or significant influence a thrilling number of down-ticket politicians in state and local legislative positions around the country. So in the present circumstances: it doesn't matter that they hate the establishment GOP's presidential candidate. Because it would be insanity to discourage the conservative Christian turnout keeps their tea party and Christian right puppets in the legislatures.

Thus the leaders of the Christian Right want a high turnout from their "flocks" this fall. In my opinion, their ideal result would be "high turnout, Romney loses, their right wing nut candidates are re-elected, even more right wing nuts slip into the legislatures...and conservatives everywhere blame a Romney loss on the GOP establishment."

If Romney wins, the feelings at the top levels of the Christian right will be very mixed. (That's indicated by the lukewarm remarks about Romney you're hearing from them right now. "Anybody but Obama" is not a real endorsement of Mitt Romney, it's actually a kind of insult.) A Romney victory would prove that the secular "Establishment" wing of the GOP is still the most credible leadership for the party--and the leaders of the Christian Right would be uncomfortable with that result. In the end, the leaders of America's Christian right want it all. They want the Establishment Republicans coming to them for favors, not the other way around.

The result and significance of all the preceding is as follows. Even if the national evangelical leadership supplies only lukewarm puffing for Romney, the conservative evangelical voters will turn out for him in their millions. The leaders of the Christian Right are unelected, they are political propagandists and organizer, and they have trained their target voters to turn on a dime. It's proto-fascism; the rank-and-file do what the leaders of the movement say, when they say it--even if it contradicts everything the leaders just said.


Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site