Skip to main content

Chris Hayes apologized for a "controversial" statement about war "heroes".

Hayes' statement follows here:

I think it's interesting because I think it is very difficult to talk about the war dead and the fallen without invoking valor, without invoking the words "heroes." Why do I feel so [uncomfortable] about the word "hero"? I feel comfortable -- uncomfortable -- about the word because it seems to me that it is so rhetorically proximate to justifications for more war. Um, and, I don't want to obviously desecrate or disrespect memory of anyone that's fallen, and obviously there are individual circumstances in which there is genuine, tremendous heroism: hail of gunfire, rescuing fellow soldiers and things like that. But it seems to me that we marshal this word in a way that is problematic. But maybe I'm wrong about that.

I think that there was such a backlash to this honest statement shows American culture's inability to reconcile with reality. By and large, the average American, occupier, right wing, left wing, unless they're anarchists or radical pacifists would raise some questions about the statement by Hayes. They're uncomfortable without the backdrop of heroism, even among occupiers I talk with, there's the inherent idea that we need to respect veterans who are fighting for 'freedom.'

Freedom, that nebulous term that means nothing, has no definition and lingers everywhere. Orwellian doublethink embodies itself in words like freedom, heroes, honor, American.

My questions are the same I've been asking for years in regards to war and American exceptionalism: Why do we feel the need to qualify anyone who dies overseas in an illegitimate war as a hero? This isn't to raise questions about just war theory, but to analyze the language we marry to our discussions on war.

Why are soliders heroes while teachers are burdens? Why are the dead and fallen engaging in foreign occupations respected and regarded with honor while the very same war machine costs us peace, lives and global stability?

I'm not saying that we should be disrespectful of soldiers, I have friends that have deployed and fought overseas, and I have a deep and profound love for them as friends, and comrades, but not because of their service overseas. I respect them for who they are.

I was at the ceremony where veterans threw away their medals in opposition to NATO in Chicago. They longed not for recognition, but for humanity. Heroism and grandeur establish a pedestal, and isolation, instead of community, integration and love. Psychologically, heroism is dehumanizing and perpetuates a narrative in pop culture that soldiers are inhuman, either through being more than human (heroism) or less than human (radical pacifism). The best approach we can take is to humanize, to stand for real humanity, the ambiguities and tragedies of war are a reality.

The best way we can honor soldiers is not to call them heroes, in my experience those who return shirk the title anyways. The best way we can create real honor in this country is to undo the war-cult, and look at soldiers honestly, and really as a people apologize that we've let elected officials control the lives of our soldiers and send them wherever they please.

The best thing we can do as a society is radically oppose war, and call for a popular end to conflict, from the proxy wars and drone wars, to the combat troops in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere. Instead of tolerating the churning of America's imperial war-machine and the propaganda it puts out, we should instead unite behind the humanity of our soldiers, and attempt to make a serious place for them, in a world without war.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  er0tikka - we call them heroes because the are (0+ / 0-)

    In my view every member of our armed services who has been on the wrong side of an AK47, held their ground, established a field of fire, and protected themselves and the other members of their unit is a hero to the people who joined them in battle. Every member of my units who protected my flank, or the rear, is a hero to me. Unfortunately many of them are on The Wall and if not for them, I would be too.

    What could be more heroic? What more do you need?

    Soldiers do not start wars, that is done by politicians.

    "let's talk about that"

    by VClib on Tue May 29, 2012 at 11:52:22 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site