Skip to main content

It is this week we are to hear the Supreme Court rule on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the mandate to purchase health insurance in particular.  The court announced the day to introduce the decision will be Thursday June 28.  What hangs over the opinion is a debate about one or more aspect of the law, what Justice Ginsburg implied in a recent appearance described was close and contentious.  It is irresistible to speculate what bedevils the court is the lack of a limiting principle to guide the individual mandate.  Despite this controversy, court watchers predict the reminder of the law will stand.  

Perhaps that single provision deserves criticism; it comes off as a legislative contrivance to avoid a new tax, as a something for everyone to hate.  But, yesterday morning Tom Brokaw expressed on Morning Joe the powerful sentiment ‘if not this law then what?’   Something in harmony with the following poll:

"an Associated Press-GfK poll shows that more than three-fourths of Americans do not want their political leaders to leave the health care system alone in the event the court throws out the health care law"

http://www.npr.org/...
http://ap-gfkpoll.com/

One way to see how little controversy the law has is to look how large portions of the bill have and will proceed no matter what the decision Thursday.  In the last six years this region of New Hampshire has seen the emergence of a plan to an integrate health care.  The Granite State Health network was announced in 2012 and is the destination for these efforts.  Practices already are linked to the particular hospital in their area; specialists communicate with PCPs by the electronic medical record.  That means also spcialists are communicating with other specialists.  It is not just helpful, it is what patients expect is going on.  Within the walls of the hospital we have rapid response teams that have reduced the number of bad outcomes, reduced ICU utilization.  A culture of safety in emphasized.  Communication with pharmacies in and out of hospitals has reduced the amount of unnecessary and injurious care.  All of these efforts are part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Don Berwick, former head of The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),summarizes it best without to much policy jargon.  According to Dr. Berwick improving the U.S. health care system requires simultaneous pursuit of three aims: improving the experience of care, improving the health of populations, and reducing per capita costs of health care.  Much of the ACA is devoted to this last point, on areas of waste and inconsistency.*  CMS is implementing these provisions and after Thursday these initiatives will continue.

http://content.healthaffairs.org/...

•Failures of Care Delivery: the waste that comes with poor execution or lack of widespread adoption of known best care processes, including, for example, patient safety systems and preventive care practices.

•Failures of Care Coordination: the waste that comes when patients fall through the slats in fragmented care. The results are complications, hospital readmissions, declines in functional status, and increased dependency, especially for the chronically ill.

•Overtreatment: the waste that comes from subjecting patients to care that, according to sound science and the patients' own preferences, cannot possibly help them—care rooted in outmoded habits, supply-driven behaviors, and ignoring science.

•Administrative Complexity: the waste that comes when government, accreditation agencies, payers, and others create inefficient or misguided rules.

•Pricing Failures: the waste that comes as prices migrate far from those expected in well-functioning markets, that is, the actual costs of production plus a fair profit.

•Fraud and Abuse: the waste that comes as fraudsters issue fake bills and run scams,28 and also from the blunt procedures of inspection and regulation that everyone faces because of the misbehaviors of a very few.

http://jama.jamanetwork.com/...

For those of us on the front lines (so to speak) of medicine, we see it as a war against bad outcomes.  Its a physical, moral, and emotional challenge that comes with an ancient mandate to provide care.  I would hope that should easily be seen as a mandate for all to contribute, no less important to people than feeding or defending ourselves. Yet we have this unexpected furious debate that is wearisome and misguided.  If the ability to feed ourselves was threatened would we be debating whether the constitution allows us to bend an individuals choice?  Would a similar critique be applied to a draft?  At the risk of digressing into picayune history, this political debate is like the draft riots in New York during the civil war which seem so misguided and shortsighted today.  To borrow a phrase from the conservative judge Laurence Silverman can we see the law as an effort to ‘forge a national solution?'

http://www.cnn.com/...

http://www.slate.com/...

Another way to see how little controversy the law has is to look to the alternatives. Several influential GOP lawmakers have sponsored comprehensive bills that in some ways resemble the ACA, with health insurance exchanges, subsidies for the uninsured to buy coverage, and insurance market reforms.  Paul Ryan in the house has a proposal that is a nonstarter; it simply shifts costs without a plan to remedy a strained private sector unable to control cost and which limits access as a result. The senator from Oklahoma Tom Coburn—a physician, also a contradictory if not insensitive and vocal critic of the bill during its construction in 2009—has a bill to offer if the entire act fails.  He loses me in his rhetoric, but his work with Joe Lieberman looks like it leaves aside insurance reform and its problems with affordability and instead focuses on Medicare alone.  This leaves alone the long-term insolvency of hospital insurance, as the Ryan plan does.  Both keep us rationing care by rationing people to use a formulation from of Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  

By the way, any national healthcare reform act under a President Romney is predicted to be a reform of private insurance.  Yes, he expected to abandon his famous efforts in Massachusetts and follow the GOP wish for purchasing insurance across state lines; this is without a national remedy for the race to the bottom in quality and coverage:  

Beyond repeal, Romney said that he favors letting states come up with their own solutions to the problems of the uninsured, healthcare costs, and quality gaps. His brief reform outline would:

•Allow health insurers to sell policies across state lines, free from state benefit mandates;
•Require insurers to offer policies to people who have been continuously insured regardless of preexisting medical conditions;
•Let individuals and small businesses form purchasing pools to buy less expensive coverage;
•Cap noneconomic damages in medical malpractice lawsuits and encourage alternative dispute resolution;
•Encourage high-deductible health savings account plans by eliminating deductibility rules; and
•Help states develop mechanisms for covering people with chronic illnesses and other preexisting medical conditions.

On Medicare, Romney proposes to give seniors a voucher -- called "premium support" -- to buy coverage from either the Medicare fee-for-service program or a private plan. He also would raise the eligibility age by an unspecified number of years. On Medicaid, he would give states more control by converting open-ended federal funding into capped block grants. Both of these proposals lack key details, such as the annual rate of increase in the Medicare voucher and block grants.

From this lineup I am no longer left wondering if republicans, conservatives, and especially Mitt Romney ready to own this on Friday.  The GOP is clearly unprepared for what they wish for. I say they do not seem to have a vigorous alternative in waiting let alone having the will to fight a reform through congress. While we wait for their plans and will, millions of twenty-somethings will be thrown off insurance rolls.  Preexisting conditions clauses will be reinstated. They will even let stand the ‘donut hole,’ a mess they created with the Medicare part D which is a painful, absurd challenge to patients and physicians.  (It is this time of the year onward that we have gaps in our schedules from many seniors not being able to afford drugs or other medical care in the latter parts of every year.)  

Most of all do they not have a plan for what the insurance companies themselves will do after their lobbyists arrive at capitol hill.  Leave aside the new goals to provide guaranteed issue (ignoring preexisting conditions and medical complexity)  and community rating (finding fair and faffodable insurance rates,) the reality is their business model is going the way of commercial whaling—ever extreme efforts for ever decreasing service.  
http://www.npr.org/...

Let me leave with another reality; that supports the possibility—at least the possibility—that the law will stand in its entirety.  The healthcare system that evolves from the provisions of the Affordable Care Act is not going to have insurance companies as we know them.  In the future we will see hospital systems working with patients and entities such as Medicare, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and ‘insurance providers’ to help provide health care to citizens.  

One model for this fused entity is the Accountable Care Organization (ACO).   I mention ACOs because serving the existence of an institution such as this can be construed as something different that purchasing insurance; it is contributing to a health security provider.  According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), an ACO is "an organization of health care providers that agrees to be accountable for the quality, cost, and overall care of Medicare beneficiaries who are enrolled in the traditional fee-for-service program who are assigned to it."  But this can be applied to patients outside of Medicare.  It is true that now just under half of the patients served by hospitals are Medicare patients and that portion will rise to over 60% by the end of the decade.

Other models exist here in New Hampshire such as the self-insured Dartmouth Hitchcock center touted throughout the 2009 debates as an example of one of the best integrated medical systems.  Another, perhaps, is the single payer system being developed in Vermont.  Vermont is forging a single payer system that provides universal coverage system with the inclusion of healthcare insurance companies in the process. “for individuals and small businesses that participate in the federally mandated insurance “exchange,” which provides tax credits and subsidies for those who qualify.” They hope to do this wihout an individual mandate.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

http://www.slate.com/...

http://www.youtube.com/...

http://www.forbes.com/...

http://www.forbes.com/...

I subscribe to Medscape and apologies are in order because it is a password-protected site.  Its free but password protected
http://www.youtube.com/...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwhM9oIlDMg

http://en.wikipedia.org/...

http://www.npr.org/...

http://www.kff.org/...

http://vtdigger.org/...

* In another venue the former head speaks of two goals for the Affordable Care Act 1) improvement in coverage and 2) improvement in quality. Quality and cost are intertwined.  
http://onpoint.wbur.org/...

Thu Jun 28, 2012 at 9:58 AM PT: I did not know crow was so sweet a thing to eat

Thu Jun 28, 2012 at 9:59 AM PT: I did not know crow was so sweet a thing to eat

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Republican Health Care Plan (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    zenbassoon

    Don't get sick.  If you do get sick, Die Quickly.

    •  That is one of my bumper stickers! (0+ / 0-)

      Oh the looks I get if I have to drive through Beverly Hills.  

      "Selfishness must always be forgiven, you know, because there is no hope of a cure." Emma 1816 Check out my blog http://uninsuredinca.blogspot.com

      by ArtemisBSG on Wed Jun 27, 2012 at 08:32:28 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  I Think That Doctors and Hospitals (0+ / 0-)

    should have a list of prices for how much even a bottle of asprin cost so that consumers can make informed choices.  If the healthcare system wants to be a private healthcare system in competition in the free market system than we should treat them as such.  Maybe I would go to a different hospital or doctor if one was charging higher than the other, or maybe their hospital and doctor had better ratings than another hospital or doctor.  I would like to see cost, ratings, and more transparency.  

    "Don't Let Them Catch You With Your Eyes Closed"

    by rssrai on Wed Jun 27, 2012 at 05:13:39 AM PDT

  •  Good research (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Gooserock, kareylou

    to add to what you are saying about monitoring ICU with rapid response teams, I can attest to that.  I had a cardio version the day before yesterday at the VA.  They had monitors set and docs on hand regionally to view the procedure and intervene if necessary with even more specialists.  I was very confident to begin with but after that was explained to me, even more so.  I do not believe for a minute that veterans and the rest of America's citizens have a clue of how much President Obama has done for us all and in particular regarding health care.  It amazes me to hear the talk from the ignorant and I blame the media for not doing its job.  They are too busy covering the important things like sex tapes from the Karwreckian sisters.   Shame on them for their failure.

    •  It's the Job of Democrats to Understand the Media (0+ / 0-)

      environment and overcome it. They seem to have a pathological aversion to communication and motivation most of the time.

      It's the job of the media to promote the corporate agenda, not to inform the people or host civic debate. That's purely an assumption, an assumption that has been flat wrong since the framers first discussed it.

      We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

      by Gooserock on Wed Jun 27, 2012 at 05:55:04 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •   I did not know crow was so sweet a thing to eat (0+ / 0-)

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site