Skip to main content

Indian Begger Child Ayn Rand

"Evil requires the sanction of the victim" - Ayn Rand


The other day in my perusings I stumbled upon this troubling jewel
Not  only do Indians perform more Google searches for (Ayn) Rand than  citizens of any country in the world except the United States, but  Penguin Books India has sold an impressive number of copies -- as many  as 50,000 of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead each since 2005, a  number comparable to sales there by global best-seller John Grisham. And  that's not counting the ubiquitous pirated copies of her works that are  hawked at rickety street stalls, sidewalk piles, and bus stations -- an  honor that Rand, a fierce defender of intellectual property rights,  probably would not have appreciated. Foreign Policy
To put this information into some perspective I would ask you to read a paragraph from Wikipedia:
The  World Bank estimates that 456 million Indians (42% of the total Indian  population) now live under the global poverty line of $1.25 per day  (PPP). This means that a third of the global poor now reside in  India.(...) India has a higher rate of malnutrition among children under  the age of three (46% in year 2007) than any other country in the  world.
Now into that context, to see what Indians are so eagerly googling, let's mix in the following sayings of Ayn Rand, which though few, hopefully give the full flavor of her "Objectivist" philosophy:
"Evil requires the sanction of the victim."

"If any civilization is to survive, it is the morality of altruism that men have to reject."

"I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never live for the  sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine."

"Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's  whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe. Civilization  is the process of setting man free from men."

"It only stands to reason that where there's sacrifice, there's someone  collecting the sacrificial offerings. Where there's service, there is  someone being served. The man who speaks to you of sacrifice is speaking  of slaves and masters, and intends to be the master."

"Money is the barometer of a society's virtue."

Now you may ask yourself, what possible attraction could  this sort of paean to sociopathic selfishness have for the countrymen of  that paragon of selflessness, Mahatma Gandhi? How can you revere one and  also revere the other?

You can't. Rand is in, Gandhi is out.

How is this put together?

Again from Wikipedia:

A  disproportionally large share of poor are lower caste Hindus. According  to S. M. Michael, Dalits constitute the bulk of poor and unemployed.  Many see Hinduism and its subsidiary called caste system as a system of  exploitation of poor low-ranking groups by more prosperous high-ranking  groups. In many parts of India, land is largely held by high-ranking  property owners of the dominant castes that economically exploit  low-ranking landless labourers and poor artisans, all the while  degrading them with ritual emphases on their so-called god-given  inferior status.
"Dalit" is a politically correct term for "untouchable"; to  put this into clearer focus, let's hear from Mahatma Gandhi on the  subject:
Removal  of untouchability means love for, and service of, the whole world and  thus merges into Ahimsa. Removal of untouchability spells the breaking  down of barriers between man and man and between the various orders of  Being."
Now it is obvious that the Dalits (untouchables) and the  rest of India's 456 million poor, living on less than $1.25 a day, are  not the ones who are googling Ayn Rand, are they? It would be safe to  assume, I imagine, that the googlers belong to what the paragraph above  calls the "more prosperous high-ranking groups".

The mechanism at work here is also obvious. The  extreme poverty of  India  has always been a great embarrassment to Indian yuppies when  speaking to foreigners and the cruelty of its ancient caste systems is  universally condemned throughout the world by all the other belief  systems. Till now untouchability and  the extreme poverty of India have  been intellectually indefensible. How to rephrase them for the  globalized world, a place where India's elites are hot to trot?

At this point, along comes a prestigious  American, a major cult-figure,  Ayn Rand, the guru of Sri Alan Greenspan no less, someone who with her  indifference to suffering, with the  clockwork logic of her exposition and the elaborate intellectual edifice  constructed around what boils down to, "bugger you, I'm alright Jack",  justifies their system in all its time-hardened egotistical racism.

Not only do they have the absolution of their ancient religious  traditions, they now have the apostolic blessing of one of the guiding  lights of ultra-modern, western, anarcho-capitalism.

Gotta be a hit.

Something that is fun and often productive is to run things backwards  and see what turns up. Let's try that on Ayn Rand in India.

Here is the scenario: Ayn Rand is a big hit with high-caste Indians, who  would like to ignore India's racism and justify their indifference to  its poverty, but long before she made it in India, she was a big hit in  the USA: could it be for the same reasons?

Could Ayn Rand's popularity in India hold the key to her popularity in the United States?

Could India be holding up a mirror for us to contemplate ourselves?

Are we looking to Ayn Rand for the same absolution she gives the Indians?

If you stop to think about, since South Africa abandoned apartheid, what  other large, densely populated country besides India has such a history  of race problems or where the poor are so abandoned to their fate as  the USA?

It is curious to observe the relation Rand's "thinking" and her followers to our present predicaments.

"If any civilization is to survive, it is the morality of altruism that men have to reject."   Ayn Rand
"You  can spend your own money on yourself. When you do that, why then you  really watch out what you’re doing, and you try to get the most for your  money. Then you can spend your own money on somebody else. For example,  I buy a birthday present for someone. Well, then I’m not so careful  about the content of the present, but I’m very careful about the cost." Milton Friedman
"Left  to their own devices, it is alleged, businessmen would attempt to sell  unsafe food and drugs, fraudulent securities, and shoddy buildings.  Thus, it is argued, the Pure Food and Drug Administration, the  Securities and Exchange Commission, and the numerous building regulatory  agencies are indispensable if the consumer is to be protected from the  `greed' of the businessman. But it is precisely the `greed' of the  businessman or, more appropriately, his profit-seeking, which is the  unexcelled protector of the consumer." Alan Greenspan in a 1963 article, ``The Assault on Integrity'' for  "The Objectivist"  magazine - quoted by Ayn Rand in her 1967 book, "Capitalism: The Unknown  Ideal''
One of the upsides of our present predicament has been the  defenistration of luminaries like Milton Friedman, Alan Greenspan and  fellow travelers. This from the Financial Times:
The Washington Consensus, the organizing idea behind the global advance of laisser faire economics, has been unceremoniously buried.(...) The crisis has  restored the legitimacy of the state: bankers have been dethroned, Alan  Greenspan defrocked and economists exposed. Regulation is no longer a  term of abuse. Adam Smith has made way for John Maynard Keynes as fiscal  policy has been rehabilitated as a tool of economic management. Phillip Stephens - FinancialTimes
Or this from BusinessWeek:
The  cost included a Hobbesian view of business -- nasty, brutish and every  man for himself -- and a rejection of the idea that ultimately we're all  in this together. Which is precisely what we do not need at this time  of increasing global interdependence. (...) In this worldview, "business  ethics" is an oxymoron, not because of bad behavior but because ethics  can't even exist apart from some notion of a "relationship" to something  or someone else. Subordinating everything to shareholder value is,  literally, anti-ethical. Charles H. Green - BusinessWeek
Here, Charles Green, an MBA from Harvard, has gone straight to the heart of the whole matter when he says, "ethics can't even exist apart from some notion of a "relationship" to something or someone else".

That is really what human life is all about. Nothing is more defenseless and miserable than an isolated human being.

Our terror of being the only human on earth is the romance of Robinson  Crusoe. Crusoe's joy at encountering Friday, saving his life and  becoming his friend is one of the most powerful metaphors in literature.

The  human being is a social anthropoid, whose phenomenal success as a  species is due to its unique capacity for empathy, altruism and  sacrifice for the common good. If selfishness were such a survival plus,  then the common house cat would be the "master of the universe" and not  human beings.

Since we wandered over the African savanna in small groups of  hunter-gatherers, naked, without even fire, in fear of lions and hyenas,  a sprained ankle or a broken bone, during those hundreds of thousands  of years, the "common good" existed. If humans hadn't recognized it and  sacrificed for it we wouldn't be here today.

Over most of our history that  was our life, only of late have we taken a sinister detour. That wandering togetherness is what our brains, inhabiting spirits and digestive tract are built for and look where we are now.

Over a relatively few millennia we have woven ourselves into hell.

Selfishness  is precisely the least human of our traits and that it has become a  driving force in our world is perhaps the central problem we face... our  paradox: humans that dehumanize themselves.

Certainly,  unless we can recreate the essence of our cooperative origins on a mass  scale within our present technological development, there seems to be  no solution in sight to this hell we have created.

Ayn Rand is probably (with Milton Friedman)  the most profoundly immoral and destructive thinker that America has  ever produced.  Milton Friedman believed that greed was humanity's sole  motivator and Rand believed that selfishness was. Both considered what  western civilization has traditionally marked as deadly sins as virtues  not defects. Their followers are legion and we live among the wreckage  they and their "virtues" have created.

Cross posted from: http://seaton-newslinks.blogspot.com

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site