Skip to main content

On another data-heavy day, the big headline came out of the state of Ohio, where Quinnipiac dropped their latest offering. In a state that is universally defined as a battleground, an Obama +9 poll raised eyebrows almost unanimously.

As has often been the case, I cite the maxim I have often cited on polls like this one: If you have one thing, and everyone else has something else, chances are that it isn't everyone else that has something wrong.


NATIONAL (Gallup Tracking): Obama d. Romney (46-44)

NATIONAL (Rasmussen Tracking): Romney d. Obama (46-45)

NATIONAL (YouGov): Obama d. Romney (45-44)

ARIZONA (Rasmussen): Romney d. Obama (54-41)

FLORIDA (Quinnipiac): Obama d. Romney (45-41)

MASSACHUSETTS (PPP): Obama d. Romney (55-39)

OHIO (Quinnipiac): Obama d. Romney (47-38)

PENNSYLVANIA (Quinnipiac): Obama d. Romney (45-39)

VIRGINIA (Old Dominion): Obama d. Romney (49-42)

FL-SEN (Quinnipiac): Sen. Bill Nelson (D) 41, Connie Mack IV (R) 40

MI-03—D (G.Q.R. for Pestka): Steven Pestka 39, Trevor Thomas 15

NC-GOV (Rasmussen): Pat McCrory (R) 49, Walter Dalton (D) 35

OH-SEN (PPP): Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) 46, Josh Mandel (R) 39

OH-SEN (Quinnipiac): Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) 50, Josh Mandel (R) 34

PA-SEN (Quinnipiac): Sen. Bob Casey (D) 49, Tom Smith (R) 32

A few thoughts, as always, await you just past the jump ...

When Quinnipiac's battleground polling launched this morning, my electoral junkie-dominated Twitter feed damned near exploded. The general consensus, as it was with the Bloomberg poll last week, was that the poll just looked and felt a little too good to be true for team Obama.

And, much like how We Ask America's Virginia presidential poll looked even more suspect in light of their Senate numbers (which had George Allen up huge), the Q poll in the Buckeye State is similarly hamstrung by its accompanying Senate numbers. Quinnipiac had Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown up by sixteen points over Josh Mandel. Virtually no one, throughout the 2011-2012 cycle, have given Brown that kind of an edge over Mandel.

That said, a look under the hood of the sample shows it to be slightly off, but not dramatically off. Breaking down the partisan numbers, it looks like the sample is around D+8. That's not insanely optimistic: The 2008 exit polls were also D+8 (39/31/30). It is way more optimistic for Democrats than the 2010 exits, which were R+1. 2006 split the difference at D+3.

In other words: Sure, the Quinnipiac sample might tilt Democratic. But it sure as hell doesn't look like it tilts nine points in the Democratic direction, unless you think that 2012 will be a repeat of 2010. And only the most irrationally exuberant Republicans actually believe that. Most folks suspect that the 2012 electorate will be somewhere between the '08 and '10 electorates. If that is the case, one has to assume that the president has a lead, albeit a modest one, in Ohio.

In other polling news ...

  • The other two polls by Quinnipiac look like they are right on the fairway. It is hard to call Obama +4 in Florida as overly optimistic for Democrats, given that the same sample has the Democratic incumbent senator (Bill Nelson) up by just a single point. And Obama +6 in Pennsylvania seems to be right in the range of where most Keystone State polling has been as of late. If Obama sweeps these states, by the way, it becomes extraordinarily difficult to fathom a path to 270 for Mitt Romney.
  • Speaking of how those Ohio Senate numbers in the Q poll render the presidential numbers a bit more suspect, the same rule applies in North Carolina. Yesterday, the House of Ras had Mitt Romney up by a few points over the president. However, today's gubernatorial numbers really call that into question. It has been a very long time (probably shortly after the Perdue retirement) since we have seen a poll showing Republican Pat McCrory up by 14 points over Democrat Walter Dalton. Most polls have been in the 5-9 point range, as of late. PPP polls here often, and their most recent survey there had it at 11 points in their most pessimistic Democratic poll of the the year.
  • Speaking of Rasmussen, it looks like we need a tiebreaker. PPP (polling for Project New America) had the presidential race in Arizona at a mere two-point margin. But now the House of Ras has the margin at 13 points. I'm guessing PPP is closer to the pin, though I would not be shocked if the actual margin right now is almost exactly at the midpoint of these two polls, in the neighborhood of 7-8 points. But we need someone to actually head into the field there to find out, I suppose.

Originally posted to Daily Kos Elections on Wed Jun 27, 2012 at 05:00 PM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site