Skip to main content

UPDATE - The AHIP threat statement :

Cost Impact of Other ACA Provisions
The health care reform law includes a number of provisions that will increase the cost of health care coverage:

According to a technical analysis by Oliver Wyman, the new health insurance tax “will increase premiums in the insured market on average by 1.9% to 2.3% in 2014,” and by 2023 “will increase premiums 2.8% to 3.7%.” Between 2014 and 2019, the total amount assessed will be at least $73 billion.

According an Urban Institute study in Health Affairs, “eliminating age rating in the small-group and individual markets increases individual premiums for single policyholders ages 18–34 by $1,400, from $3,600 to $5,000, and for single policyholders ages 35–44 by $800, from $4,200 to $5,000.” Robert Samuelson recently wrote “The ACA [forces] some young Americans to buy insurance at artificially high premiums that would pay for the care of a sicker, older population.”

The minimum essential health benefits requirement will result in less affordable coverage for individuals, families and small employers by forcing them to “buy up” and purchase more coverage than they may want or need.

During the health care 'debate',Senator Tom Harkin said the Affordable Care Act was, in his words, 'a starter home'.

Now, we move to building a great mansion for the American people. We continue to fight for single payer, privately delivered, publically funded healthcare for all Americans.

This is a significant first step. But only a first step. Many fear that the premiums we will face in 2014, even with the subsidies, will be essentially unaffordable.

Now that we know the law will move ahead, here is a premium subsidy calculator from the Kaiser Family Foundation, you can get a sense of what sort of subsidy you might receive in 2014.

The fight for real reform continues, in the meantime though, many more Americans will be able to access healthcare in 2014, regardless of their health.

Here is what the great heroes at PNHP have to say.

The following statement was released today by leaders of Physicians for a National Health Program (www.pnhp.org). Their signatures appear below.

Although the Supreme Court has upheld the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the unfortunate reality is that the law, despite its modest benefits, is not a remedy to our health care crisis: (1) it will not achieve universal coverage, as it leaves at least 26 million uninsured, (2) it will not make health care affordable to Americans with insurance, because of high co-pays and gaps in coverage that leave patients vulnerable to financial ruin in the event of serious illness, and (3) it will not control costs.

Why is this so? Because the ACA perpetuates a dominant role for the private insurance industry. Each year, that industry siphons off hundreds of billions of health care dollars for overhead, profit and the paperwork it demands from doctors and hospitals; it denies care in order to increase insurers’ bottom line; and it obstructs any serious effort to control costs.

In contrast, a single-payer, improved-Medicare-for-all system would provide truly universal, comprehensive coverage; health security for our patients and their families; and cost control. It would do so by replacing private insurers with a single, nonprofit agency like Medicare that pays all medical bills, streamlines administration, and reins in costs for medications and other supplies through its bargaining clout.

Research shows the savings in administrative costs alone under a single-payer plan would amount to $400 billion annually, enough to provide quality coverage to everyone with no overall increase in U.S. health spending.

The major provisions of the ACA do not go into effect until 2014. Although we will be counseled to “wait and see” how this reform plays out, we’ve seen how comparable plans have worked in Massachusetts and other states. Those “reforms” have invariably failed our patients, foundering on the shoals of skyrocketing costs, even as the private insurers have continued to amass vast fortunes.

Our patients, our people and our national economy cannot wait any longer for an effective remedy to our health care woes. The stakes are too high.

Contrary to the claims of those who say we are “unrealistic,” a single-payer system is within practical reach. The most rapid way to achieve universal coverage would be to improve upon the existing Medicare program and expand it to cover people of all ages. There is legislation before Congress, notably H.R. 676, the “Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act,” which would do precisely that.

What is truly unrealistic is believing that we can provide universal and affordable health care in a system dominated by private insurers and Big Pharma.

The American people desperately need a universal health system that delivers comprehensive, equitable, compassionate and high-quality care, with free choice of provider and no financial barriers to access. Polls have repeatedly shown an improved Medicare for all, which meets these criteria, is the remedy preferred by two-thirds of the population. A solid majority of the medical profession now favors such an approach, as well.

We pledge to step up our work for the only equitable, financially responsible and humane cure for our health care ills: single-payer national health insurance, an expanded and improved Medicare for all.

Garrett Adams, M.D.
President

Andrew Coates, M.D.
President-elect

Oliver Fein, M.D.
Past President

Claudia Fegan, M.D.
Past President

David Himmelstein, M.D.
Co-founder

Steffie Woolhandler, M.D.
Co-founder

Quentin Young, M.D.
National Coordinator

Don McCanne, M.D.
Senior Health Policy Fellow

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Renee, mwjeepster, filkertom, Radiowalla, ferg, slinkerwink, miasmo, Dem 724, Shockwave, Pescadero Bill, Wintermute, hyperstation, Aspe4, Smedley Hirkum, devtob, Gareth, hubcap, opinionated, bronte17, TracieLynn, fugwb, bluesteel, Xapulin, Pithy Cherub, boadicea, Bensdad, fumie, Iberian, lulusbackintown, SneakySnu, dejavu, Getreal1246, Eric Blair, sockpuppet, Dallasdoc, Tracker, superscalar, Smartyjones, cosette, Chirons apprentice, lcrp, Diana in NoVa, zerelda, ybruti, tomjones, Deward Hastings, Sassy, sebastianguy99, Gowrie Gal, Skennet Boch, Bluesee, marina, 3goldens, NoMoreLies, jrooth, democracy inaction, Simplify, Brooke In Seattle, Byrnt, eru, ladybug53, Sandino, Isara, WisePiper, Pluto, JanL, Jim P, Orinoco, Themistoclea, tonyahky, Gorette, raincrow, luckydog, kck, mooomb, rockyboy, blueoasis, MJ via Chicago, Libby Shaw, real world chick, mithra, joe shikspack, ER Doc, middleagedhousewife, llbear, chicating, fiddlingnero, kurt, zedaker, Blicero, bstotts, DBunn, tegrat, One Pissed Off Liberal, bluicebank, leema, leftyguitarist, lachmom, puakev, LillithMc, Mary Mike, Via Chicago, LamontCranston, deepeco, joedemocrat, bnasley, HCKAD, Killer of Sacred Cows, SeaTurtle, uciguy30, GeorgeXVIII, leonard145b, M Sullivan, cloudbustingkid, South Park Democrat, TomP, vivaldi, MKinTN, fuzzyguy, wayoutinthestix, Youffraita, elwior, honey, Laughing Vergil, icebergslim, Gemina13, priceman, Nica24, rhutcheson, ZhenRen, prettygirlxoxoxo, J M F, divineorder, BigAlinWashSt, ussr, indres, shopkeeper, Shelley99, jpmassar, porchdog1961, Words In Action, commonmass, jethrock, eb23, Crabby Abbey, angelajean, Lost and Found, sunny skies, Eddie L, gulfgal98, moke, Actbriniel, Mac in Maine, Mister Met, redlum jak, StateofEuphoria, slowbutsure, implicate order, m00finsan, asterkitty, gmats, California06, SoCaliana, EquityRoy, floridablue, peregrine kate, VTCC73, doornob, blue aardvark, Sunspots, ArtemisBSG, tinhut, absdoggy, ridemybike, Liberal Granny, JTinDC, mooremusings, California One Care, 2thanks, MartyM, james321, Vote4Obamain2012, Dumas EagerSeton, Lily O Lady, rigcath

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site