Skip to main content

I started this diary back in January.  Since then I have been very busy.  I pick it up now and look at it and it still resonates.  

After looking at all the proposed amendments (in congress) to supposedly "fix" the problems created by the Supreme Court Citizens United ruling I have come to the conclusion that it is the usual TwoParty Elephant and Donkey show.  I will spend no more time on analysis because these amendments have been analysed to death by every left wing outfit in the USA and they all are deemed wanting because they don't do EVERYTHING the left want done.  The sad truth is that what the left wants done is not what the 99% want done and the left is incapable of dealing with that FACT.  The propriety of public campaign finance is highly questionable while the current government that would manage the system is as corrupt and dysfunctional as it is.  Even without public finance just about every supposed attempt at amendment empowers the totally dysfunctional US congress.  At least 30% of the voting public are smart enough to understand that we do not want to ensconce and/or add to the power of the TwoParty train wreck that we have.  And there is another 20% of the public that have a religious aversion to any government control over what people can do with their own money as regards elections.

So while the left pines away for more, and more, left, left, left, stuff in any amendment, every drop of left erodes the support for an amendment that would address the primary problem.  That problem is, of course, the ability of entities  NOT contending for federal office office to employ paid political advertising to slander/libel candidates that ARE running for office.  The reason that such activity must be outlawed is that the only truly accountable source of political electioneering speech are the actual candidates competing for the various federal offices.  They will all be held accountable for what they say by competing candidates and by the voters, and ultimately perhaps by the court system itself.  

And at this point I refer you to my own website where I have placed the current version of my REAL "occupy" amendment according to yours truly.  I am very hopeful that Occupy will adopt this sort of approach as opposed to pleading with the two-party and its nimrods to please, please, please, pretty please, do something.

Coming to the Point

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Why Don't You Include It Here? nt (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Mother Shipper, Musial

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Mon Jul 02, 2012 at 07:09:10 PM PDT

  •  Two things I'd like (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Musial

    1---Only people eligible to vote for a candidate can have any part in that candidates campaign, including donations and "issue" items.

    2---No state or local election official can have any part in any campaign other than their own.

  •  1. Put it here. 2. I don't see how it's better (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Musial

    compared to all the others.

  •  TruthM - post it here (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Musial

    Using a diary as a tease to pimp your own blog is against the the rules.

    "let's talk about that"

    by VClib on Mon Jul 02, 2012 at 08:03:27 PM PDT

  •  the conversation has moved past CU somewhat (0+ / 0-)

    as American Tradition revealed the federal court's vulnerability to an eleventh amendment challenge raised in the amicus briefs. Montana failed to raise this in the cert argument as explained at The Eleventh Amendment Movement's website. Congress has several options, referring an amendment requiring 2/3 and 3/4 supermajorities, and a friendly Roberts Court; passing the Eleventh Amendment Enabling Act making state anti-corruption statutes unreviewable on private challenges;or the omnibus Granny Haddock Act that uses the exceptions clause, a Madisonian check against the court, believed overly harsh by the Court's defenders. At the end of the day any new amendment will need implementing legislation, which is where the public will come on board. It is possible to pass the legislation both in the states and in Congress without amending the Constitution. Moneyouttapolitics.org has researched the options under consideration.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site