Skip to main content

Dems control both houses and the governor’s office in Arkansas, yet they managed to draw a congressional map in which all four districts favor the GOP. This exercise is to test whether the Dems could have gotten a better map by passing no bill at all, and instead letting a court handle it.

The map:

ark

The districts, with PVI based on 2008:

AR1: This has most of the eastern part of the state outside the greater Little Rock area. It is largely rural, with Jonesboro and Pine Bluff as the two semi-urban areas. Pine Bluff and most of the areas along the Mississippi are heavily black and thus Dem-friendly, while the rest of the district is very white and very red. Overall the adult population is 27% black and the district is about R+8. Dems could compete there with the right candidate.

AR2: Little Rock and its exurbs, plus White county further up I-30. Little Rock is blue, but the rest of the district is really red even for Arkansas. Overall this district is 20% black and about R+9, not much more red than AR1 as its white population is more urban and slightly less conservative. It’s comparable to the district they actually drew and as in AR1 the right Dem might be able to contest it.  

AR3: This corresponds to the Ozark plateau, with most of the population in the Fayetteville-Bentonville area in the northwest corner. I could have put most of the rural areas between Jonesboro and Fayetteville into AR1 and Fort Smith into AR3, but this would have forced AR4 to stretch from the southwest corner to the northeast corner which I think would be less plausible than this map. Anyway, this AR3 is just 1% black and R+18.

AR4: The I-40 corridor from Fort Smith most of the way to Little Rock, and Bill Clinton’s old stomping grounds in the state’s southwest quadrant. 9% black, but at R+20 it’s even more red than the lily-white AR3. Explanation: Fayetteville is in AR3, and like most southern towns with big state universities it serves as a containment area for moderate and liberal whites.

So this map has two districts that Dems may be able to win without getting a perfect storm. The actual map they drew has one, with AR2 at around R+9. The actual AR1 is R+13 and AR4 R+15. These might not be 100% out of reach as all of Arkansas outside the Ozarks is ancestrally Dem and recently open to voting for Dems even at the House level, but certainly much harder to win than the hypothetical AR1. Forget AR3, as any plausible version of it would probably be among the last 50 districts held by the GOP even in the event that they were nearly wiped out at the national level.

Conclusion: A court would likely have drawn two semi-competitive and two safe red districts. Dems actually drew one semi-competitive district, two that heavily favor the GOP, and one safe red. I suspect that the odds of an Arkansas Dem winning an R+8 are more than twice the odds of winning an R+13 to R+15, and as such they probably would have had more success over the decade with a court-drawn map than with the dummymander they actually drew.

What should the Dems have done? Maybe draw a district in which they would actually be favored, by attaching Little Rock and Pine Bluff to the Mississippi river counties. In this map, AR1 is 37% black and about D+2 without splitting any counties more than necessary to achieve population balance.

ark alt

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (7+ / 0-)

    SSP poster. 42, new CA-6, -0.25/-3.90

    by sacman701 on Sat Jul 07, 2012 at 06:04:17 PM PDT

  •  My thoughts (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    atdnext

    Your first map is probably 3 R 1 T, the 1st is a true Tossup while the 2nd has too many suburbs.  Furthermore, most of the Democrats in the 2nd are liberals, so the nominee would likely be a liberal as well (the Blue Dogs are mostly rural).

    Your second map has the unfathomable (to the AR Dem establishment) likelihood of a Black Democrat being the Representative.  I recently drew a much more gerrymandered map that preserved 2 Tossups for Blue Dogs, although in the long term your map is definitely our best bet, as Whites in AR are getting more Republican.

    Age 19, CA-18 (home), CA-13 (college)
    Check out my blog at politicohen.com
    Socially libertarian, moderate on foreign policy, immigration, and crime, liberal on almost everything else.
    Berkeley Class of 2015. -.5.38, -3.23

    by jncca on Sat Jul 07, 2012 at 06:47:26 PM PDT

  •  Nice try. Your first map looks decent... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    DownstateDemocrat, SLDemocrat

    But honestly, I don't know if even that could elect more than 1 Blue Dog. Arkansas is simply trending away from Team Blue, and I doubt there's anything (at least anything palatable to the vast majority of the Democratic base) we can do to stop it. If AR Dems are lucky enough to have the reins in 2021, their only chance of having any kind of foothold in the Congressional Delegation probably lies in your second map.

  •  In a state that's 3/4 Oklahoma and 1/4 Wisconsin (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    abgin, CF of Aus

    Trying to draw more than one Democratic district out of four is really pushing it.  The first map looks like a court drawn map.  It has good communities of interest, and it has 2 districts where Blue Dogs could be competitive.  Although I'm starting to think the Age of Bluedogs may be over for good.  The second map is what Democrats should have drawn.  It also has god communities of interest, except where it splits up the outer Little Rock suburbs into multiple districts.

  •  Your first map (0+ / 0-)

    No Democrat will ever win the 2nd. White, Lonoke and Saline have been tough for Democrats to win for a while.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site