Skip to main content

In today's NYT an excellent opinion piece lays out the "civil war" in Appalachia over coal and specifically mountaintop removal.

The guts of the issue is here:

Appalachia is engaged in a civil war of sorts over coal, with miners and their families pitted against environmental activists. The central issue is mountaintop removal, a radical form of strip mining that has left over 2,000 miles of streams buried and over 500 mountains destroyed. According to several recent studies, people living near surface mining sites have a 50 percent greater risk of fatal cancer and a 42 percent greater risk of birth defects than the general population.

Despite the evidence, the coal industry and its allies in Washington have persuaded the majority of their constituents to ignore such environmental consequences, recasting mountaintop removal as an economic boon for the region, a powerful job creator in a time of national employment distress.

Of course, since mountaintop removal is heavily mechanized, the coal industry is the real job killer — and, until recently, miners would have been suspicious of any claim to the contrary. For decades the companies had fought the miners’ efforts to unionize, resulting in violent strikes.

What we have is a bunch of economically vulnerable people who are buying into the company line because they have been convinced that they have no choice. The article goes on to detail how those who dissent against that company line have faced death threats and actual violence: arson, vandalism, and worse.

One activist, Maria Gunnoe, saw "Wanted" posters with her picture put up all over her hometown. Last month, when she testified before Congress and presented a photograph of a five year old girl bathing in dirty, brown water, she found herself facing, wait for it, child pornography accusations from Republicans. That's how the corporations and their allies deal with dissent.

The coal industry essentially has its employees between a rock and a hard place. They tell their employees that they are operating on behalf of the employees' interests, that they want to protect their jobs. In reality, they want to protect their bottom line, and they will do whatever they can, even if it means breaking the law and endangering the miners, to make their money.

Although it didn't specifically involve mountaintop removal, we all should remember the explosion that killed 29 of the 31 miners working at the Upper Big Branch mining site where it occurred on April 5, 2010.

Here's a reminder about how much that company, Massey Energy, cared about the safety of its workers, from the WaPo:

The West Virginia mine where at least 25 workers died Monday in an explosion was written up more than 50 times last month for safety violations. Twelve of the citations involved problems with ventilating the mine and preventing a buildup of deadly methane.
I wish I had some easy answers about how to convince miners that the coal companies aren't their best friends. Increasing union membership would certainly help, for starters. Take a look at the NYT article for yourself. For us, the first step is to be informed. From there, the question is how to break through the pro-industry wall of propaganda. Any thoughts are welcome.

Originally posted to Ian Reifowitz on Mon Jul 09, 2012 at 06:07 AM PDT.

Also republished by ClassWarfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS Working Class Global Occupy movement, Income Inequality Kos, Invisible People, In Support of Labor and Unions, Appalachian Journal, and The Federation.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site