Skip to main content



Peter Hartcher, the political and international editor of the Sydney Morning Herald -- one of Australia's most influential papers -- just published an editorial castigating Australia's leaders failure to lead. In a piece entitled "They can't stonewall forever," he ripped both Julia Gillard, Australia's Prime Minister and head of its Labor Party (shown left with Penny Wong, right, her Finance Minister and first openly lesbian cabinet member) and Tony Abbott, head of the opposition Liberal (but conservative) party, for opposing the tide of history as regard to marriage equality.

There was no mincing of words by Mr. Hartcher.

What do slavery, wife beating and child labour have in common? All were once mainstream practices in Western countries. Today, they are unacceptable violations of rights...

Why do Australia's political leaders think that discrimination against gay people should be any exception to what the Harvard psychology professor Stephen Pinker calls the Right Revolutions that have been raging for decades, even centuries?

He then gets into brass tacks and statistical truths...
At the end of World War II, homosexuality was illegal in all but a score of nations. Today, the balance of global attitudes has reversed sharply; 120 nations have decriminalised homosexuality while about 80 retain it as a crime.

... resistance to gay marriage in Australia has collapsed not in 50 years but in no more than seven... In 2004, fewer than one in four Australians was in favour of official recognition of gay marriage... But by November last year, the position had reversed dramatically. Support stood at 62 per cent, according to a Herald Nielsen poll. Opposition was exactly half as widely held, at just 31 per cent.

The Herald Nielsen poll showed that, among Labor voters, a whopping 71 per cent favour official recognition of same-sex marriage... As for Abbott... he too is in the minority of his own party on gay marriage. The Herald Nielsen poll found that 50 per cent of Coalition voters support same-sex marriage, and 44 per cent oppose.

Having laid out why the Gillards and Abbotts of Australia are anachronisms, Hartcher delivers his coup de grace.
The unvarnished truth is that on same-sex marriage, both leaders followed the ironic advice of the 19th-century French democrat Alexandre Auguste Ledru-Rollin: "There go the people - I must follow them, for I am their leader." Gillard and Abbott have staked out positions they thought mainstream, but the mainstream has deserted them. Not wanting to look foolish and weak, they will hold their positions. Later this year they will frustrate the effort to give gays equal rights.

And they will be left on the wrong side of history.

One really has to wonder how hard it could be for Gillard and Abott to look at the world changing or to think about how they will be viewed twenty or thirty years from now. Do neither of them feel the call of the future's past?
"He ((Obama)) is the first president to say he's in favour of gay marriage. He will also be the last Democratic president willing to not say that he was in favour."
Can Australia's leaders really feel comfortable with such a historical legacy -- blocking the advance of human rights for who-knows-how-many-more years, despite the overwhelming sentiment of the people they are supposed to serve?  Do they really want to be Stephen Douglass to Abraham Lincoln? John McCain to Barack Obama?

I would think not. But apparently they do.

Originally posted to jpmassar on Sun Jul 15, 2012 at 07:17 AM PDT.

Also republished by Progressive Policy Zone, Milk Men And Women, and Angry Gays.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site