Skip to main content

With the prospect of Powder River coal being carried across the Northwestern states of Washington and Oregon on its way to power the Chinese economy, citizens and officials are beginning to register their disapproval of the idea. And why not? States and localities are on the hook for dealing with the greatly expanded capacity needed, not to mention the coal dust the cars leave behind. And then there's the idea of states that are leaders in green tech, being used as conduits to power economies still more reminiscient of 1912 than 2012.

Jefferson Smith, mayoral candidate for Portland, Oregon, spoke up quickly. Here's a brief video statement representing his position on Oregon: Coal Mule...

Context after the jump...

The Oregonian picked up on the statement by Smith, following up on earlier serial reporting about the coal export issue. It's a fairly simple concept: mining concerns in the Powder River Basin of Montana and Wyoming are dying to increase their output and sell it to countries in Asia. Oregon and Washington lie between the mines and the ocean. You can't drive coal in trucks; the carrier can't be enclosed due to combustion risk. Trains it is. And then you need coal terminals at the ocean ports--six, in fact, according to the mining industry.

The third point in Smith's video--exploring options with the City Attorney--reflects the uncertainty with which NW states may be forced to accept the coal transit. Thus much of what is possible now involves studying available options and making formal statements of opposition. The louder and the faster those statements are made, the better. It was good to see Smith out front in Portland on the issue.

And why oppose? Let the Western Organization of Resource Councils lay it out:

Among the findings:
* Existing rail traffic, including export grain traffic and import and export container traffic, will likely experience a deterioration of rail service and higher freight rates and equipment costs, with railroads likely favoring the more profitable coal business. Increased delays could bump import-export container traffic away from Northwest ports to California and Canada.
* Total required rail improvements in Washington, Oregon, Montana, Wyoming and Idaho could exceed $5 billion. The railroads, principally BNSF Railway, which has the shortest routes, would pick up costs for many line upgrades. But state and local governments "would likely bear the brunt" of local improvements to compensate for train traffic, spending "hundreds of millions" on projects such as rail bypasses and adding overpasses to separate trains from roads.
* The rail traffic would hit existing chokepoints. All trains would move through Billings and "the funnel" from Sandpoint, Idaho, to Spokane. The Columbia River Gorge and the Interstate 5 corridor from Portland to Seattle would also face crowding challenges, though BNSF has two other east-west lines in Washington that it could use to lessen the impact.
* States and communities have little leverage on federally regulated railroads. But agricultural shippers, states and others with concerns should lobby Congress to require thorough review of potential rail impacts by the federal Surface Transportation Board. That review could include requiring railroads to spend money on improvements.
This will be a contentious issue to be sure, and will reach beyond Portland's borders. But what happens within them is ripe conversation for Portland politics, and Jefferson Smith has made his mark.

Originally posted to torridjoe on Mon Jul 16, 2012 at 10:42 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos Oregon.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site