Skip to main content

Glorious late-in-the-day news, on the very day that the Democrats take the reins in the Wisconsin State Senate!

Yet another judge has issued a permanent injunction against the Walker/ALEC Voter ID law.  It is now extremely unlikely that Voter ID will be in force for the November elections.

This is now the second Dane County judge to declare the Voter ID law to be contrary to the Wisconsin Constitution, wherein Article 3, sections 1 & 2 define an unusually robust (among the states) right to vote.

More beyond the fleur de Kos!

From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Second judge rejects state voter ID law; Requirement will not be in place for fall elections

A second judge has declared Wisconsin's voter ID law unconstitutional, further guaranteeing that the ID requirement will not be in place for elections this fall.

Dane County Circuit Judge David Flanagan wrote Tuesday that the state's requirement that all voters show photo ID at the polls creates a "substantial impairment of the right to vote" guaranteed by the state constitution.

The first judge to issue a permanent injunction was Dane County judge Richard Niess in March, responding to a case against the law brought by the League of Women Voters.  Niess' ruling ensured that the ID requirement was not in place during the recall elections, though other changes (length of residency, signing a poll book) were allowed to go forward.  This new decision applies to a different suit against the same law, brought by the Milwaukee Branch of the NAACP and Voces de la Frontera.

Again from the Journal Sentinel:

Having a second ruling against the law makes it all the more difficult for voter ID proponents to get the law reinstated because they would need to get both orders lifted.

Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen asked the state Supreme Court to take up both cases earlier this year to get a quick resolution to them, but the court declined. The state's high court is expected to eventually take the cases. Meanwhile, two other challenges to the law have been filed in federal court.

Van Hollen has appealed the ruling in the League of Women Voters case to an appeals court in Madison. That court is not expected to rule until after November, meaning photo IDs will not be required at the polls in the Aug. 14 primary and Nov. 6 election.

Expert testimony estimated that over 300,000 eligible voters in Wisconsin have neither a driver's license nor a state ID.  State IDs themselves, when acquired for the purpose of voting, are now free in Wisconsin.  However, one needs a birth certificate to get the ID, a document which is NOT free (if indeed, for some people, it even exists).  This was the key point in the decision:
The cost and the difficulty of obtaining documents necessary to apply for a (Division of Motor Vehicles) photo ID is a substantial burden which falls most heavily upon low-income individuals.
The ALEC thumb on the scale of democracy that is Voter ID will NOT be weighing down the Wisconsin elections this fall.  Hurrah!

Originally posted to AnnieJo on Tue Jul 17, 2012 at 06:59 PM PDT.

Also republished by Badger State Progressive and Good News.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site