Skip to main content

Crossposted from Hillbilly Report.

In my opinion the single most pressing problem for our economy and our Democracy as a whole is the festering cancer of income inequality that has arisen in the last few decades. To me, it is not that hard to see that if a very few people are the only ones who have any spare money to spend it will be very bad for the economic well-being of our country as a whole. Combine the fact that the top 1% continue to be allowed to horde all our nation's wealth to the top with the disasterous Citizens United ruling and it is not hard for anyone to see where the biggest threat to freedom in America is coming from. It stems from the fact that in America it is beginning to look like one very small group of people are always going to have the best government they can buy.  

And while there are numerous issues that need to be addressed It seems as if it would be easy for average working families to figure out the best place to start since it would benefit them. Raising wages for Americans that work and are not paid enough to make ends meet and have anything left to contribute to the economy. Many of them are just lucky to have a job at all. Unfortunately for many of us the idiocy of outsourcing the middle-class for the greed of the very few has resulted in dependency on service industry jobs to make a living for ourselves and our families.

That is why the Rebuild America Act introduced by Tom Harkin earlier this year is so important. It would do something that would immediately raise wages and living standards for tens of millions of people. Raise the minimum wage to an acceptable level and tie it to inflation in the future. As David Cooper at Economic Policy Institute has shown gradually raising the minimum wage to $9.80 an hour by 2014 would improve the lives of over 28 million working people:

As Table 1 shows, increasing the federal minimum wage in three steps to $9.80 per hour, as described in the Harkin bill, would raise the wages of 28 million Americans. About 19.5 million workers whose wages are between the current minimum and the proposed $9.80 rate would be directly affected. Another 8.9 million whose wages are just above the proposed minimum would also see a pay increase through “spillover” effects as employers adjust their overall pay scales.

In fact, not only would raising the minimum wage help millions of us that are already working, but indeed it would help currently unemployed Americans by creating desperately needed jobs over the next three years:

Furthermore, low-wage workers tend to spend rather than save an additional dollar earned, often because they have little other choice. The additional  household consumption generated by this boost to low-wage workers’ paychecks would benefit the labor market as a whole, because  the resulting economic activity translates into job growth. After controlling for a reduction in corporate profits resulting from the minimum wage increase, and assuming some of the business expense of paying higher wages is passed on to consumers, the net effect of the proposed minimum wage increase is an increase in economic activity of over $25 billion over the next three years, which would generate roughly 100,000 new jobs.
Many of us realize the common sense behind raising the minimum wage. However there continues to be one group of workers that as a whole are ignored in most states and the country. Tipped workers. While the Harkin bill does address the tipped minimum wage that remains set in most states at $2.13 an hour it does not solve a simple problem. There should be no tipped minimum wage and tipped workers should be entitled to the full minimum wage whether they recieved tips or not.

Research by the National Employment Law Project has shown a few things. Because of the erratic nature of tips, tipped workers still live in poverty or just above:

Even after accounting for tips, the vast majority of tipped workers are still barely getting by. According to our analysis of Current Population Survey data
from 2005-2007, tipped workers nationwide earn a median wage of $8.23 per hour including tips, or just $17,118 annually (in 2007 dollars). Waitresses and waiters earn slightly more, but still only $9.00 per hour including tips or $18,720 annually—barely more than the poverty level for a family of three and less than the poverty level for a family of four.32 As a result, a sizeable percentage of waitresses and waiters live in families below the poverty level—and the rates are even higher for black and Hispanic waitresses and waiters.

In the few states where they are guaranteed a living wage, it has made a real impact on their lives providing an instant boost to income:

Wage data from states with higher tipped worker minimum wages show how such protections boost incomes and improve economic security for tipped workers. For example, in the seven states that provide tipped workers the full minimum wage, plus Hawaii, which has just a nominal 25 cent tip credit, the median wage for waitresses and waiters is $10.00 per hour— $1.00 higher than the median in the other 42 states.
And despite the arguments that the same folks within the Republican Party and Corporate America recite like gospel one simple truth remains. A fair wage for all workers does absolutely nothing to hurt the economy or job growth:
For example, a 2006 study by the Fiscal Policy Institute examined job growth between 1998 and 2003 in the ten states and the District of Columbia that had minimum wages higher than the federal rate at that time—Alaska, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. The study compared job growth in those states with the forty states that did not have higher minimum wages. All ten of the high minimum wage states examined in the study also had tipped worker minimum wages higher than the federal $2.13 rate. In fact, four of the ten guarantee tipped workers the full state minimum wage and Hawaii allows tipped workers to be paid just 25 cents less. The study found that these ten states actually had faster job growth among small businesses than the other forty states. This experience highlights how job growth is driven overwhelmingly by other factors in a state’s economy—not by how high or low the state’s minimum wage is.
Although they would never admit it, even the National Association of Resteraunt's own studies have shown that higher wages for tipped workers will not result in job losses:
Even the National Restaurant Association’s own analysis of industry trends projects that four of the five fastest growth states for restaurant jobs over the next decade will be states that mandate high minimum wages for tipped workers: Arizona ($4.25), Florida ($4.19), Nevada ($6.85), and Alaska ($7.15).
Now, Americans should think to themselves just who these tipped workers are. Waitresses and waiters work in a fast paced, high stress environment with little margin for error. Bartenders must deal with the some of the most difficult folks on earth. Pizza delivery drivers work a job that is consistently one of the most dangerous in America. They use their own equipment and fuel and are rarely compensated fairly for their risks.

The fact is these workers deserve the full protections of the minimum wage along with any tips that come from excelling at their jobs. These jobs place wear and tear not only on their bodies but in many cases equipment they invest in themselves. The only real reason for not paying them the full minimum wage is the same reason our country as a whole is suffering. The simple greed of the very few and the fact that so many Americans are misinformed and will not fight against monied interests for their neighbors or even themselves.

It is time we reversed these disturbing trends in the American workplace and society as a  whole.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  All true, but you're missing Romney's point, (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    which is why it won't happen unless O wins and we keep a Senate majority at least.  To Rs, the job with benfits and a good wage lost is never counted in what they do, and the killing of that job and replacement of it with a minimum wage no benefits job is 'job creation' as Romney and his fellow oligarchs consider the matter. My own guess is that R would be no better than at break even if he had to count thejobs killed along with the jobs allegedly created, and definitely no better if in order to count a job created, it had the same or better wage and benefits than the one he killed off. Not all jobs are created equal, and the oligarchs think they have the right to demand that all else work at dead screaming no benefit minimum, because that gives oligarchs a wider choice of workers desperate for any work at all, their natural birthright. The fact that in so doing they kill of the goose that buys the stuff which is their golden egg, and they are killing off their customers when they do this means nothing to them, until it suddenly does. .

    •  'until it suddenly does" (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      This is right, but I don't see how it can ever matter to them. Until the world of labor is in a steady state, meaning all workers making same low wage and having the same low living standard, it cannot matter a whit to the oligarchs. And we have a loooong way to go to get to that world-wide steady state.

      The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right. Mark Twain

      by BlueMississippi on Sat Jul 21, 2012 at 10:28:45 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  The problem with these studies is that (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ConfusedSkyes, RDemocrat

    I can only assume they use self-reporting of tips as their premise.  If a study starts by saying tipped employees only earn $8 per hour with tips, that is probably not accurate. I know bartenders who make hundreds of dollars a night who only report $20-30. The ignorance of the law is amazing in this area.  The law states that tipped employees must report all of their tips, and if the total reported is less than 8% of gross sales, the employer shall report the employee to the IRS for possible investigation.  Many employees, and not a few employers, believe that the law requires them to report 8% of sales as their actual tips earned. Some employers know better, but require employees to report at least 8% just so they do not have to be bothered with compliance.

    Some employers require employees to report 100% of tips added to credit or debit card sales, because they are easily tracked during a possible audit.

    But don't tell me waiters, waitresses and bar staff are self-reporting 100% of their tips, because it just ain't so.  

    Don't get me wrong, I've lived in states that have no tip credits and I've lived in states with steep tip credits.  I believe tip credits should be abolished.  I'm just leery of studies that begin with a false premise.

    In ten years Obamacare will be as popular as Social Security and Medicare, and Mitt Romney will be demanding all the credit.

    by Fiddler On A Hot Tin Roof on Sat Jul 21, 2012 at 02:01:13 AM PDT

  •  Important subject to discuss, thank you n/ t (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
  •  There should be (3+ / 0-)

    no tip income. Workers should be paid by their employer for the work they perform, period.

    I would also submit that the minimum should be much higher, somewhere in the range of $15-$18 per hour, which is where it would be if indexed to inflation since the 70's.

    Expecting anyone to live, or especially support a family, on ten bucks an hour is frankly ridiculous.

    "A lie is not the other side of a story; it's just a lie."

    by happy camper on Sat Jul 21, 2012 at 05:56:36 AM PDT

  •  I'm all for pushing this (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    at the federal level, but states and localities can make a difference too. It's appalling how many states have laws setting the minimum wage at or below the federal level.  

    There's a major push for a living wage in NYCgoing on right now. A real living wage, especially for businesses that make money from the government (for example through contracting) should be something all Democrats proudly and loudly get behind.

    Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity. Notes on a Theory

    by David Kaib on Sat Jul 21, 2012 at 08:48:52 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site