Skip to main content

Picture of young Ann and Mitt Romney dressed in formal wear
Oh how they struggled.
Dude. Dude.

As Jed Lewison reported, Mitt Romney's new "biographical" ad attempts to re-re-re-re-re-introduce him to voters, as if not knowing about him is the problem. Uh, Mitt. The voters know more than enough. They're just not that into you. And this doesn't help:

The ad opens with Mitt Romney talking about his business background and saying that he knows what it's like to start a business and create jobs and "to wonder whether you're going to be able to make ends meet." If you're the Harvard-educated son of an auto industry CEO who is worth hundreds of millions of dollars and has bank accounts in the Caymans, a secretive Bermuda shell corporation, and, until recently, a Swiss bank account, those are words that should never escape your lips. And that's doubly true if you've made millions while firing workers and bankrupting companies.
Mitt and his chief adviser on lady things (and horses), Ann, have talked so much about just how hard they had it back in the day that it's clearly a strategy, not a gaffe.

Recall this tale of woe and hardship from Ann:

They were not easy years. [...]

We were happy, studying hard. Neither one of us had a job, because Mitt had enough of an investment from stock that we could sell off a little at a time. [...]

Mitt and I walked to class together, shared housekeeping, had a lot of pasta and tuna fish and learned hard lessons. [...]

We were living on the edge, not entertaining. No, I did not work. Mitt thought it was important for me to stay home with the children, and I was delighted.

Right after Mitt graduated in 1975, we had our third boy and it was about the time Mitt’s first paycheck came along. So, we were married a long time before we had any income, about five years as struggling students.

Clearly, Romneyland believes that if Mitt and Ann insist often enough that they're just regular folks who've had it tough, lived on the edge, struggled to make ends meet, and, of course, pulled themselves up by their bootstraps all on their own with no help from anyone (except for that stock portfolio from Daddy Romney, of course, and that house from Daddy Romney, of course), maybe voters will believe it.

But that's not really the worst of it. The truly sick and twisted thing about this utterly false tale of woe is that Mitt and Ann, though they swear they can relate to people who struggle today, are actually sadists who relish the struggling of others.

Mitt Romney, after all, likes firing people. (Oh, sure, he meant corporations—because he can't tell the difference between corporations and people.) He tells "humorous" stories about his father, as president of American Motors, shutting down a factory in Michigan and putting a bunch of people out of work. Humorous indeed.

And of course, the supposedly more sympathetic Ann Romney, Mitt's "greatest asset" who supposedly humanizes him, yukked it up at the Connecticut Republican Party’s Prescott Bush Awards Dinner, saying:

I love the fact that there are women out there who don’t have a choice and they must go to work and they still have to raise the kids. Thank goodness that we value those people too. And sometimes life isn’t easy for any of us.

Who says that? Seriously, who says that? What kinds of monsters enjoy the struggling of others, take pleasure in the unemployment of others, find the hardships that their fellow Americans face to be "humorous" fodder, and then, on top of it all, they dare to claim that they too know how hard it is, they too have struggled, because gosh, it sure is tough to raise a family on an inherited stock portfolio.

These are terrible people. Really terrible people.

Originally posted to Kaili Joy Gray on Tue Jul 31, 2012 at 11:21 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

kos, David Nir, Angie in WA State, Dave the pro, TXdem, dugjxn, ferg, Gooserock, emal, Debby, donna in evanston, ChicDemago, Jay C, lysias, xynz, Matilda, exNYinTX, vrexford, hnichols, regis, pmcmscot, jem6x, mkfarkus, denig, jennifree2bme, sngmama, fumie, kitebro, Iberian, Redfire, VexingEyes, jblogger, Sychotic1, samoashark, tomjones, vacantlook, Sassy, vcmvo2, Unit Zero, revbludge, ccasas, dewtx, YucatanMan, boofdah, lennysfo, PSzymeczek, SaraBeth, Inland, kaliope, Bob B, coolbreeze, Shaking the Tree, Cory Bantic, occams hatchet, Clytemnestra, dopper0189, VolvoDrivingLiberal, cookseytalbott, KenBee, Zwoof, middleagedhousewife, bumbi, Bernie68, bstotts, One Pissed Off Liberal, old wobbly, timewarp, jedennis, theChild, uciguy30, GeorgeXVIII, cloudbustingkid, elwior, beltane, glendaw271, phrogge prince, LaFeminista, MrsTarquinBiscuitbarrel, greengemini, fearisthemindkiller, Carol in San Antonio, notrouble, DefendOurConstitution, followyourbliss, elziax, papahaha, sfarkash, Vita Brevis, Larsstephens, Lefty Ladig, commonmass, estreya, blueyescryinintherain, eb23, Crabby Abbey, Lost and Found, renzo capetti, laserhaas, rfhusker, eclecta, stevenaxelrod, Texdude, slice, kerflooey, MidwestTreeHugger, Hill Jill, agrenadier, Dretutz, sfcouple, stone clearing, Mr MadAsHell, OhioNatureMom, Nicci August, deeproots, zukesgirl64, sethtriggs, thomask, BarackStarObama, wintergreen8694, MinistryOfTruth, Andrew F Cockburn, Vatexia, Hayate Yagami, weinerschnauzer, googie, Auriandra, Davui, hulibow, Pinto Pony, i saw an old tree today, OldDragon, angry marmot, nellgwen, midgebaker, a2nite, Trotskyrepublican, investorb, Horace Boothroyd III, belinda ridgewood, oldflowerchild, pittie70, Vote4Obamain2012, marty marty, databob, maf1029, Prospect Park, LibbyLuLu, Lily O Lady, Blue Bell Bookworm, nomandates, ebailey, Late Again, PHScott, Icicle68, OjaiValleyCali, BitterEnvy, Smoh, Laura Wnderer, ET3117, Hey338Too, ChristineM

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site