Skip to main content

This is a full crosspost of the original piece, originally written exclusively for ePluribus Media and only partially crossposted here The reason I thought it was worth reposting in full here is to enable more complete responding & reaction to a recent comment made by  Sen. Lindsey Graham(R-Delusional) at an appearance at the University of South Florida on 7/30/2012 ... -- GreyHawk

"Gaeity" is a term denoting joyful exuberance or merriment, but in the hands of today's Republican party, I would not be surprised to find it reinterpreted to a bastion of misleading and negative connotations almost as confusing as the definition and use of the word  gay.  The "Party of Moral clarity" has demonized the use of any word, term or action that could even hint at homosexuality in order to key into the knee-jerk prejudice of millions of "Christian" voters everywhere.  (Note that I put quotes around "Christian" -- I can't duly insult those who actually practice the teachings attributed to Christ, when I'm only targeting those who simply claim to.)  Whenever I hear GOP leaders or pundits screech about a "homosexual agenda" and accuse someone of being gay as though it is a crime against humanity (unlike torture, or melting the flesh off children), I wonder why nobody asks them to clarify.

I mean, are they talking gay like Mark Foley, or not gay like Duke "Hookergate" Cunningham?

(Cunningham pic source: madcowprod dot com)  

Are they talking gay like former Rep.  Ed Schrock, or not gay like Senator Larry "Wide Stance" Craig?

(Hat-tip theblacksentinel)  

Perhaps they mean not gay like David "Diaper Man" vitter, or not gay like former Speaker Dennis "A Finger in Every Pie Scandal Hastert? (Dennis, cont'd)

Vitter pic source:

Perhaps it is the overall example of moral clarity and focus -- his idea of it, at least -- that Tom "The Bug Man" Delay (see also) set for his Republican brethren that first initially got them all confused with the meaning of certain terms.  Who knows?

(Hat-tip The Dood Abides)  


Republicans are playing the "moral values" card more and more often, desperately attempting to reinforce the misplaced meme that -- bolstered by their strong "faith" -- they are somehow not only above reproach but also in a position to be forgiven for any minor inequities while denouncing the slightest failing of others.  Indeed, the capacity of the Right-Wing Noise Machine1 to gather and swarm like a colony of killer bees attempting to decimate their enemy is almost legendary.    It also appears to be a defense mechanism deeply rooted in fear, self-loathing and some weird form of psychological denial and projection whereby they find the illness within themselves that they most detest and project it upon their enemies, making it -- and the enemy -- a target of vitriolic hate to be destroyed, a scapegoat2 upon which they heap all their poison and failing and then drive off a cliff in order to feel justified, cleansed and reaffirmed in their self-appointed role of society's sole benefactors.

It is all a delusion, of course.

The Republican Party of the past two decades has distinguished itself as the Party of Penultimate Corruption, working steadily toward subverting the law and preventing due process as well as oversight in their quest for dominant power.  The increased spread of "conservatism" has marked the insidious growth of deceptive practices and manipulation in order to build, reinforce and spread support of their methods, and the sickness that this signifies is spread: the "group mind" that Jung once theorized becomes the "mindless mob" of Republican punditry and zealous disciples, moving en masse in knee-jerk reactionary style to the slightest twitch or tweak of the exposed, raw nerves of once stable moral fibre running the breadth the land.  In short, today's Conservatives (and hence most of todays Conservative Republicans) are a disease upon the land.  It may sound harsh, but even the US Government knows what ill now infests the nation: the government even produced a report3 concluding that "conservatism can be explained psychologically as a set of neuroses rooted in "fear and aggression, dogmatism and the intolerance of ambiguity."

As if that was not enough to get Republican blood boiling, the report's four authors linked Hitler, Mussolini, Ronald Reagan and the rightwing talkshow host, Rush Limbaugh, arguing they all suffered from the same affliction.  All of them "preached a return to an idealised past and condoned inequality".  

Ouch.  Even worse, the authors -- realizing the predictable swarm that their report would likely produce -- issued a disclaimer that their study

"does not mean that conservatism is pathological or that conservative beliefs are necessarily false".

Heh.  Riiiiiiight... So, that would mean that the poor, mixed-up souls listed above are simply a deviation from the norm of upstanding Republican behavior, right?  

[Note: Many of the references following come from the same source.]

  • Republican Congressman Dan Crane had sex with a female minor working as a congressional page.
  • Republican Congressman Donald "Buz" Lukens was found guilty of having sex with a female minor and sentenced to one month in jail.
  • Republican Congressman and anti-gay activist Robert Bauman was charged with having sex with a 16-year-old boy he picked up at a gay bar.
  • Republican legislator Peter Dibble pleaded no contest to having an inappropriate relationship with a 13-year-old girl.
  • Republican legislator Keith Westmoreland was arrested on seven felony counts of lewd and lascivious exhibition to girls under the age of 16 (i.e.  exposing himself to children).

Perhaps there's a reason: could it be the help?  Republicans may be unfairly disadvantaged in the realm of hypocritical sexual misconduct.  It could be that they just can't find folks who actually embrace those idealized Republican Family Values they prize so much.

  • Republican politician and former GOP Committeeman Andrew Buhr was charged with two counts of first degree sodomy with a 13-year old boy.
  • Republican campaign chairman Randal David Ankeney pleaded guilty to attempted sexual assault on a child and was arrested again five years later on the same charge.
  • Republican Committee Chairman Jeffrey Patti was arrested for distributing a video clip of a 5-year-old girl being raped.
  • Republican Party Chairman Donald Fleischman was charged with two counts of child enticement, two counts of contributing to the delinquency of a child and a single charge of exposing himself to a child.
  • Republican Party leader Paul Ingram pleaded guilty to six counts of raping his daughters and served 14 years in federal prison.

If they can't depend on reliable help throughout the foundation of their party, what hope have they got of preventing corruption from reaching (or leaking out of) the upper echelons of their party?  Perhaps that explains their party's obsession with fundamentalism and the reason behind the GOP getting into bed with the radical right.  (Oooops...was that a pun, or just the sad truth...?)

What kind of Christians are these guys? The "Party of Christian Values" is, of course, formed from the bedrock of radical fundamental Christianity.  What could possibly taint such a solid, upstanding image? Well, perhaps a few bad apples that had rotted through to the core:

  • Republican benefactor of conservative Christian groups, Richard A.  Dasen Sr., was found guilty of raping a 15-year old girl.  Dasen, 62, who is married with grown children and several grandchildren, has allegedly told police that over the past decade he paid more than $1 million to have sex with a large number of young women.
  • Republican preacher Stephen White, who demanded a return to traditional values, was sentenced prison after offering $20 to a 14-year-old boy for permission to perform oral sex on him.
  • Republican pastor Mike Hintz, whom George W.  Bush commended during the 2004 presidential campaign, surrendered to police after admitting to a sexual affair with a female juvenile.

And let's not forget Ted Haggard or the "Right" Rev.  Jimmy Swaggart (Warning: YouTube video).

The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose.   - William Shakespeare

With such upstanding examples to lead the way, no wonder these fine leaders see no reason to justify things such as denying the mandatory vaccination of young women against a sexually transmitted virus, or pushing to overturn the right for a woman to have an abortion -- particularly a young, underage woman? After all, if we would simply adhere to a successful program of teaching abstinence, wouldn't all our young men and women be safe, and therefore not need any contraceptives, abortions, sex education or fear any sort of STD?  ...well...not so much.  It appears that Republican hypocrisy sets a somewhat backward example for our younger generations:

  • Republican anti-abortion activist John Allen Burt was found guilty of molesting a 15-year old girl.
  • Republican anti-gay activist Earl "Butch" Kimmerling was sentenced to 40 years in prison for molesting an 8-year old girl after he attempted to stop a gay couple from adopting her.

Surely, these must be isolated incidents and not a sign of pervasive perversion, right?  Well...again, not so much.  There are some older historical references that allege that senior Republican stateman and former President George H.W.  Bush's Whitehouse had some sordid affairs that ~almost~ came to light:

Republican lobbyist Craig J.  Spence organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.

These, of course, are no longer shocking particularly after the Gannon affair(s?).  Much to our collective shame, we also hold the unabashedly disgusting distinction that in recent years our military and defense intelligence networks have allegedly engaged in the most heinous of tortures, human rights abuse and outright crimes against nature and humanity:

Republican Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld authorized the rape of children in Iraqi prisons in order to humiliate their parents into providing information about the anti-American insurgency.  See excerpt of one prisoner's report here and his full report here.

This stain upon the soul of nation emerged during the reign of "Bush the Younger" -- George W.  Bush, and his cabal of criminal enablers. Could it be that our Republican friends, in their drive to be loyal to God and Country (but Party above all), have overlooked the basic "quirks" that denote such twisted deviants so clearly for the rest of us? Combined with the efforts to flush the faithful to the polls and suppress "the opposition" by hook or by crook, these well-meaning loyal party members may simply require another reminder about the type of people they are actually pushing to the forefront to represent themselves. Candidates for President and Exemplars of Model Conservative Republican Family Values    John McCain:

McCain was still married and living with his wife in 1979 while, according to The New York Times' Nicholas Kristof, "aggressively courting a 25-year-old woman who was as beautiful as she was rich."

Rudy Giulianni:

Giuliani informed his second wife, Donna Hanover, of his intention to seek a separation in a 2000 press conference.


In the acrid divorce proceedings that followed, Hanover accused Giuliani of serial adultery, alleging that Nathan was just the latest in a string of mistresses, following an affair the mayor had had with his former communications director.

And the serial hopeful, serial adulterer, serial hypocrite Newt Gingrich:

But the most notorious of them all is undoubtedly Gingrich, who ran for Congress in 1978 on the slogan, "Let Our Family Represent Your Family." (He was reportedly cheating on his first wife at the time).

That would be an example of blatant hypocrisy, which has come to symbolize the true nature of today's conservative Republicans -- and Republicans in general, for that matter.  To continue from the piece,

In 1995, an alleged mistress from that period, Anne Manning, told Vanity Fair's Gail Sheehy: "We had oral sex.  He prefers that modus operandi because then he can say, 'I never slept with her.'"

This, too, is an example of Republican strategizing: pre-planning an excuse, a workaround or a loophole in order to ensure a degree of plausible deniability.  It's the Republican way of having to avoid the prevarications required to figure out what the definition of "is" is.  A few more facts from the same paragraph:

Gingrich obtained his first divorce in 1981, after forcing his wife, who had helped put him through graduate school, to haggle over the terms while in the hospital, as she recovered from uterine cancer surgery.  In 1999, he was disgraced again, having been caught in an affair with a 33-year-old congressional aide while spearheading the impeachment proceedings against President Clinton.

And there we have "family values" and hypocrisy4 all neatly bundled up in one disgusting package -- the same package responsible for delivering a Contract on America that resulted in setting the stage of faux credibility and morality while enabling the start of one of the most massive subversions of truth, justice and integrity ever undertaken and premeditated by any political party in American history.  It is, in my estimation, one of the very keystones to the overall foundation of corruption that led to ultimately to the disgraceful sham that is now the George W.  Bush and Republican Party legacy: the most inept, criminal and subversive incarnation of the United States government ever to exist, and it is spearheading America's entry into the twenty-first century.  It is a major black mark in the history of our nation, and sure to taint, stain, smudge and smear the efforts of all who strive to overcome it in the next few years.

For you suffer fools gladly, seeing yourself as wise.  - II Corinthians 11:19

There is no option, at this point, for any Republican follower to continue to support the words and deeds of the currently entrenched political elite: the ideology of "conservatism" has not only proven to be a dismal failure, it has also negatively impacted the nation and the world for at least the next fifty years.  Only through the embrace of a progressive, forward-thinking agenda can we hope to undo the damage of the silver-tongued devils who road the coattails of propriety into power and then swiftboated sanity en masse.  For any true Republican, the only way to undo the legacy of evil that has culminated in the Bush regime is to wholly reject the dangerously subversive and deluding hypocrisy of the far right, and move leftward toward a true center with progressive Democrats and the rest of America.


1. "Reich"-wing is more like it, if you ask me.  

2. The link is to an earlier piece of mine on dKos called "The Pet Goat" that delves into the traditional symbolism of the scapegoat and the GOP's practice, particularly in George W.  Bushworld, of always having one in order to deny accountability.  The piece appeared several places, and can also be found on ePluribus Media, Booman Tribune, My Left Wing, ProgressiveHistorians, Political Cortex and Never in Our Names.  An important companion piece is Juxtaposition: Edgar Lee Masters and Lessons of Life from Death on the old ePluribus Media scoop site and the short informative blurb on DailyKos called Failure, Scapegoats and the Juxtaposition of Life from Death.

3. Source: The Guardian Unlimited, Study of Bush's psyche touches a nerve, Julian Borger in Washington, 13 August 2003.  

4. More on Gingrich's hypocrisy during the Clinton affair can be found here: Gingrich Had Affair During Clinton Probe, by Ben Evans, The Associated Press, 8 March 2007 via The Washington Post online.

Thu Jul 03, 2014 at 11:41 AM PT: The recent "Hobby Lobby" decision has had the interesting effect of bringing out a rousing chorus of "holier than thou" among the GOP & conservatives, who appear to neglect /' forget their own party's habit of habitual hypocrisy.

Originally posted to GreyHawk on Tue Jul 31, 2012 at 11:56 PM PDT.

Also republished by Citizen Journalism.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  This is not updated, just crossposted. (7+ / 0-)

    For reference, mostly.

  •  Here's the bit that reminded me of this piece: (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bluedust, Smoh, luckylizard
    "It’s hard these days, trying to do the Lord’s work in the city of Satan.”
                    - Sen Lindsey Graham (R-Delusional), University of South Florida, 7/30/2012
  •  I have never understood how "christians" could be (5+ / 0-)

    so forgiving of themselves and so unforgiving in those they find to not be "one of them".  Are Christian values only for christians?  I think not.  This holds true for the rights of Americans.  The one thing that separated us from other countries is with the exception of the right to vote anyone on American soil has the same rights - the very same rights - as an American citizen.

    So is there a lifetime cap or are we rationing Christian values and American rights?  Because if that is the case the point of Christianity and the promises of America are lost on those individuals.

    LOL.  That is one of my favorite quotes: Even the devil can quote the bible.

  •  It is all our fault. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    GreyHawk, Smoh, luckylizard

    Instinct-driven people are creatures of habit and their mode of behavior is composed of imitation and repetition.
    So, when they accuse others of deception and libertine behavior, they are just repeating (saying back) what was/is said about them. Indeed, since their behavior is largely copy-cat behavior, it's possible that just hearing about licentious acts prompts them to engage in them.

    Many people, it seems, act without thinking.  They just do what "comes naturally" on the spur of the moment, totally unaware of the hormone surge that's propelling them forward or making them run away in fear.

    Just as their actions are largely reactions or re-enactions of a well worn pattern, their speech is prompted by code words.  It's the pattern Google has adopted.  Most of the time, the response to a prompt will be appropriate (on topic) and sometimes it's not. If there is no information responsive to the prompt, Google will ask if the word has been misspelled. Instinct-driven people just make stuff up. Stuff is connected in their memory bank like the stuff in a junk drawer -- stuff you want but don't use on a regular basis.

    Calling instinct-driven and rambling people out on their idiocy is what's making them mean-spirited.  They don't take correction.  They take umbrage and "give back as good as they get." They don't "turn the other cheek."  In fact, people who turn the other cheek and don't respond to insults convince them that they are on the right track.
    Such people are incapable of doing unto others as they want others to do to them. That injunction relies on an awareness of the other and on a sense of the future.  Instinct-driven people have neither.  They exist in the present and carry with them a sense of injustice which they need to avenge.  They do unto others as they perceive was done to them.  It's an entirely self-centered or self-contained mode of behavior, like an automated light switch that responds to a noise, or not.
    Some of our technical inventions just copy behaviors we've noticed subconsciously.

    Willard's forte = "catch 'n' cage". He's not into "catch and release."

    by hannah on Wed Aug 01, 2012 at 02:12:44 AM PDT

    •  I like the junk drawer image. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      That gives me a clearer picture of what we're dealing with.  If all that stuff is just rattling around in their heads waiting for a time to be used, it's no wonder they come up with things that seem totally crazy to the rest of us.

      -7.62, -7.28 "Hold fast to dreams, for if dreams die, life is a broken winged bird that cannot fly." -Langston Hughes

      by luckylizard on Wed Aug 01, 2012 at 03:33:09 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  a lot of those links don't work (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    GreyHawk, Smoh

    E.g., none of them on (looks like that website has closed down).

    Just fyi. Maybe they are on, or elsewhere?

  •  Well done my friend! Well done! :-) (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    GreyHawk, Smoh

    "Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell." ~ Edward Abby

    by SaraBeth on Wed Aug 01, 2012 at 04:30:08 AM PDT

  •  One of my favorite pasttimes... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Smoh, GreyHawk

    is taking on the RWNJ's (as Twitter has so charmingly named them - *right wing nut jobs) when they start quoting scripture.

    Years back, and for reasons I don't fully remember now, I became so infuriated by the Biblical 'literalists' selective use of Scripture that I finally caved in, read the whole thing (I'm autistic, I like tedious things!) and then wrote a post-graduate thesis on it!  I've actually thought, in recent weeks, of re-posting some of the more salient parts as diaries on here but, working on the assumption that my obsessions may not interest others, I decided against it in the end.

    I actually went back to the Septuagint Bible - the first known existing version of the written bible, written in ancient Greek - and was fairly successful at, one by one, dismissing their various claims.  In particular, I focussed on the Pauline writings (as Paul seems to so obsess them) and on the incorrect transliterations which had led to centuries of false translations being propounded, one on the other.

    To be clear, I have no problem whatsoever with any faith that anyone else wishes to subscribe to - that's fine by me - the more invisible men, the merrier (!), but what I DO object to, is them telling ME (or anyone else) how to live MY/THEIR life.  

    I sometimes take them on on Twitter and I must admit that at times it can be worthwhile but, more usually, it ends up with them simply accusing me of quite absurd things or with them tweeting obscenities back at me.

    I'm so sorry, I realize this isn't entirely in line with your diary post - but, truly, the Right Wing mis/ab-use of scripture to cast  judgement and vitriol on others, really does make me beyond mad.

    Bearing a grudge is like swallowing a poison and expecting someone else to die...

    by Maianewley on Wed Aug 01, 2012 at 05:58:25 AM PDT

  •  There is no such thing as (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Smoh, GreyHawk

    "Christian values" or "Christian morality".  Jesus wasn't supportive of family life and neither was Paul.  So all these people haven't violated some hard and fast list in terms of those definitions.  What they have done is simply espoused something as important for everyone to follow, and then didn't follow it themselves. That's the hypocrisy.  

  •  Well written. I enjoyed this, thank you. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Cats are better than therapy, and I'm a therapist.

    by Smoh on Wed Aug 01, 2012 at 07:45:00 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site