Skip to main content

Documents finally released from Wisconsin's redistricting process confirm that Republicans used their legislative majorities and a lot of taxpayer money to gerrymander districts to favor their incumbents.

[Link warning: the comments section at is a cesspool into which I have not waded in a long time. Go at your own risk.]

More details below the cheddar cheese curd.

Last year, with State Senate and Assembly majorities, Wisconsin Republicans controlled the redistricting process. They chose to do so secretly, while claiming to be fair about it. The process occurred at a private Madison law office, "Michael, Best and Friedrich" and when any Democrats or other outsiders requested documents, this was refused under lawyer-client privilege. The claim was that the State Senate, and in particular the Senate Majority was the client, despite paying MBF over $430,000 in taxpayer money. People contributing to the process were pressured to sign secrecy pledges before seeing any documents. Due to the recall elections, the Democrats currently are the Senate Majority and the documents were finally released to Majority leader Mark Miller last Friday and given to reporters yesterday.

And wouldn't you know, the documents show that districts were carefully mapped and redrawn to protect incumbents and increase the number of Republican seats. I guess this is what we look forward to living with for the next 10 years. Yes I know that gerrymandering has historically been done by both parties but the secrecy and abuse of power and taxpayer money in this case are pretty offensive.

Originally posted to BRog on Wed Aug 01, 2012 at 07:25 AM PDT.

Also republished by Badger State Progressive.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site