Skip to main content

Chart showing one effect of Romney tsx cut proposal
Team Romney isn't refuting a damning new report evaluating the impact of his tax proposals by the Tax Policy Center of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution. It's just saying the center can't be trusted because it's "liberal." Romney was singing a different tune last year when the TPC was giving some grief to the tax plans of another candidate for the GOP presidential nomination, Gov. Rick Perry. TPC got Romney praises then.

The center's new study—On the Distributional Effects of Base-Broadening Income Tax Reform—explores the kind of tax changes Mitt Romney says he would make: a 20 percent income tax cut across the board, lost revenue to be paid for by eliminating a boatload of popular deductions.

Best case result, according to the TPC: Americans making half a million to a million dollars a year would average a $17,000 tax cut. For middle-class families with children making less than $200,000 a year, the average tax would increase by $2041 a year. The rich, natch, would make out like bandits, millionaires getting an $87,000 tax cut, those making more getting even more out of the deal.

And that result comes from using a model that makes the tax code as progressive as possible. It could be a lot worse. States the report:

Offsetting the $360 billion in [annual] revenue losses necessitates a reduction of roughly 65 percent of available tax expenditures. Such a reduction by itself would be unprecedented, and would require deep reductions in many popular tax benefits ranging from the mortgage interest deduction, the exclusion for employer-provided health insurance, the deduction for charitable contributions, and benefits for low- and middle-income families and children like the [Earned Income Tax Credit] and child tax credit. [...]

The above estimates assume that all available tax expenditures for higher-income households are completely eliminated—tax expenditures that include deductions for charitable contributions, mortgage interest, state and local taxes, and exclusions from income of health insurance and other fringe benefits. To the degree any of these were even partially retained for high-income households, the net tax cuts for high-income households and tax increases for low- and middleincome households would be even larger.

Effects of lowering the capital gains tax and the corporate tax were not considered.

The authors of the study make clear that figuring exactly how the details of such a tax plan would play out in the real world is no easy matter. They present numerous caveats. Just how likely would it be, for instance, that all tax expenditures for deductions could be taken away first from top income earners, reducing some of the need to cut those expenditures for less affluent Americans? Unknown. But given elected Republicans' penchant for taking the income tax closer and closer to their wealthy patrons' flat-tax ideal, "not very likely" would be a good guess.

Bottom line: Implementation of the Romney across-the-board cuts would result in even worse disparity than the TPC study shows.

As Jed Lewison pointed out earlier today, the Obama administration lost no time telling Americans exactly what Romney's plans would do. Except, being presidential and all, he couldn't say "It's a screw job, folks." Sometimes decorum gets in the way of truth.

•••

Lefty Coaster has a discussion here.

Originally posted to Meteor Blades on Wed Aug 01, 2012 at 12:13 PM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site