Skip to main content

Once again, Thursday provides us with "choose your own meme" day on the data front. If you are a devotee of Mitt Romney (and if you are, and reading this, you are presumably lost right now on the internets, or slightly masochistic), you will (yet again) point to Rasmussen as proof that all is well. Democrats, meanwhile, will be saving all their love for Pew.

On a comparably light Thursday (at least, when compared to the deluge of polls that have greeted us thus far this week), there's a poll for every narrative.

On to the numbers:


NATIONAL (Gallup Tracking): Obama d. Romney (47-45)

NATIONAL (Pew): Obama d. Romney (51-41)

NATIONAL (Rasmussen Tracking): Romney d. Obama (46-44)

NEW JERSEY (Fairleigh Dickinson): Obama d. Romney (49-36)

NORTH CAROLINA (Rasmussen): Romney d. Obama (49-44)

CA-09 (Tarrance Group for Gill/NRCC): Rep. Jerry McNerney (D) 47, Ricky Gill (R) 45

LA-03 (Public Opinion Strategies for Boustany): Rep. Charles Boustany (R) 56, Rep. Jeff Landry (R) 20, "Fred Green" (D) 15; Boustany 61, Landry 23

MI-06—R (EPIC-MRA): Rep. Fred Upton 61, Jack Hoogendyk 31

MI-11—R (EPIC-MRA): Nancy Cassis 52, Kerry Bentvolio 36; "Someone Else" 40, Bentvolio 21

MO-GOV (Mason Dixon): Gov. Jay Nixon (D) 48, Dave Spence (R) 39; Nixon 50, Bill Randles (R) 35

MO-GOV—R (Mason Dixon): Dave Spence 41, Bill Randles 15, John Weiler 3, Fred Sauers 1

NJ-SEN (Fairleigh Dickinson): Sen. Bob Menendez (D) 45, Joe Kyrillos (R) 33

NY-18 (Greenberg Quinlan Rosner for House Majority PAC/SEIU): Rep. Nan Hayworth (R) 48, Sean Patrick Maloney (D) 45

NY-21 (Anzalone-Liszt for the DCCC): Rep. Bill Owens (D) 50, Matt Doheny (R) 38, Donald Hassig (G) 4

A few thoughts, as always, await you just past the jump...

At the presidential level, today is more or less an "as expected", with one giant exception.

The House of Ras is...well...the House of Ras. They continue to give Republican Mitt Romney the edge in a national trial heat, and they also give Romney a bigger lead in the battleground state of North Carolina than virtually every pollster that has entered the field there. Same old, same old.

Meanwhile, it seems like pretty much every poll released in the Garden State this year has been somewhere on a spectrum between Obama +8 and Obama +16. Fairleigh Dickinson pretty much hits the midpoint, staking Obama to a very secure 13-point advantage in New Jersey.

But then there's Pew. And Pew is definitely dropping an eye-popper in their latest national poll. It is the first double-digit edge for Barack Obama in their poll since the height of the GOP primary, a time when Mitt Romney's national polling numbers were at their deepest valley.

Conservatives will immediately cite that (a) Pew's numbers always tilt Democratic, and (b) this sample has way too few Republicans. The problem with that critique, on the surface, is that the Obama lead is wide enough that even if the party ID shift was retrofitted to a margin that was more amenable to the GOP, Obama would still hold a pretty sizable edge.

Plus, as Sean Trende of Real Clear Politics noted today, merely equating party ID from polls to past performance isn't always shrewd. And, as he notes (and I have been as guilty as anyone of this in my not-so-distant past), it is usually the last refuge of the campaign/advocate of the guy who is losing:

I say this, in part, because we’ve been having this debate for a very long time, and it usually goes nowhere. In 2004, re-weighting polls to reflect the 2000 exit polls was all the rage among Democratic bloggers. The argument went that Republicans hadn’t had parity with Democrats in polling in a very long time, so we should ignore polls showing Republicans even with Democrats, or perhaps even ahead of Democrats in terms of ID. Of course, the final exits showed a tie between the parties, as Republicans managed to turn out their base at “supercharged” levels.

Since then, the same thing has occurred in every election: The losing side objects to the partisan composition of polling. The polls then proceed to get the final result roughly correct.

An incredibly valid point.

In other polling news...

  • Who is Fred Green? Well, apparently, he is a figment of the imagination of the polling crew at P.O.S. In an effort to see if their client (incumbent Rep. Charles Boustany) would get dragged below 50 percent in the open primary in Louisiana (which takes place on Election Day), they conjured up a hypothetical Democrat and tested the impact. The answer: the impact was minimal. "Fred" got just 15 percent, and Boustany still led fellow incumbent Jeff Landry easily, remaining over 50 percent.
  • The Michiganders at EPIC-MRA also had an intriguing polling challenge, but not a unique one. They had to test a race where a candidate on the ballot was challenged by a write-in candidate. The race is the seat in MI-11 left open by the implosion of the political career of Republican Thad McCotter. Kerry Bentvolio, a teabagger that was already in the midst of a primary of McCotter, is now being challenged by establishment pick Nancy Cassis. Her late entry necessitated a write-in bid, but EPIC-MRA still has her as a betting favorite. But polling a write-in is notoriously difficult, as we learned in Alaska in 2010.
  • This doesn't make it into the top half of the Wrap because the polling is of a generic variety, but Democrats have to be extremely heartened by this new report out this week from Democracy Corps. If their numbers are legit (and despite being a Democratic outfit, their numbers have not been unduly optimistic in the past), Democratic control of the House is still quite plausible

Originally posted to Daily Kos Elections on Thu Aug 02, 2012 at 07:30 PM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site