Skip to main content

Nancy Pelosi speaks during a visit by U.S. Representatives discussing bilateral relationships between Egypt and the U.S., in Cairo March 15, 2012. REUTERS/Esam Al-Fetori (EGYPT - Tags: POLITICS)
How rude.
The most super-duper scariest Democrat ever weighs in on Mitt Romney's invisible tax returns:
"Harry Reid made a statement that is true. Somebody told him. It is a fact," Pelosi told The Huffington Post in a Sunday interview. "Whether he did or not can easily be disposed of: Mitt Romney can release his tax returns and show whether he paid taxes."

Both Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus came out swinging against Reid on Sunday over his claims about Romney potentially not paying taxes. Asked to respond to Priebus calling Reid "a dirty liar" over the situation, Pelosi initially responded, "Who?"

This really has gone entirely too far. It was fine when we were all deciding whether or not President Clinton was a drug trafficker, or whether or not Hillary Clinton had some guy killed because of something-something-travel-receipts, or which war heros were or were not really war heroes based on this guy who said that one thing one time, or which Supreme Courts justices were probably gay based on careful examination of their softball abilities, or a bit more recently when we were determining whether the first non-white president was really even an American, given that he seems so suspiciously, you know, non-white, or which members of the House of Representatives were secretly in league with terrorists. Talking about a rich person's taxes, though—that's just too damn much.

Mitt Romney has at this point gone to the barricades to keep the voting public from knowing how much money he made over the years, or how, or how much tax he paid on it, and I think we all can agree that only a monster would suggest that maybe if this guy wants to be president of These United States and come up new budgets and be in charge of the military and maybe help enforce laws against Wall Street types doing Wall Street things and other businesses doing other business things that maybe, just maybe, how he has conducted his own business dealings over recent years ought maybe to be a damn thing that the nation has a right to know, or at least has the right to be inherently suspicious of if it's not forthcoming.

The defense offered is that the rich business guy who wants to be president is the real victim here. Since he is not legally obliged to tell us his past financial dealings, screw you all: If nothing else, this definitely shows Mitt's true Wall Street expertise, an industry in which anything not explicitly illegal is fair game, and the illegal things are fair game too if you think you won't get caught. Now that he's clammed up tighter than if he'd been caught in bed with a dead gay hooker, the rumors are flying, and Harry Reid says he had one of Romney's old business associates tell him this certain rumor, and that, my friend, is the true abomination. Or something. You know what? I don't even care anymore.

Whatever's in Mitt Romney's old taxes, whether it be zero-tax years or Swiss tax amnesties or non-tithing or that he made several million dollars on a new product called Fetus Chow, it's apparently so bad that America wouldn't vote for the rich business guy if they saw it. At this point, that's damning enough. I realize that in Mitt Romney's circles accusations as gauche as "did this jackass even pay taxes at all?" are usually farmed out to Super PACs or mid-level rodent-haired surrogates, but I think America will survive the Senate Majority Leader making a nasty comment to a reporter during an election year. I am sorry the bad man insulted your money, Mitt. I am sorry the bad man insulted someone else's money, Reince. I can only imagine the pain your entire party must be in right now.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Meteor Blades, GainesT1958, ljb, Sylv, vicki, kate mckinnon, greenbird, billlaurelMD, eeff, SallyCat, opinionated, fugwb, CoolOnion, Bill Roberts, Lilyvt, Redfire, TexDem, laughingriver, Chirons apprentice, Catte Nappe, Noisy Democrat, KayCeSF, lyvwyr101, Sybil Liberty, Ohkwai, kitchen sink think tank, PSzymeczek, deep, Ginny in CO, coolbreeze, hcc in VA, JanF, Land of Enchantment, lgmcp, Mother Mags, redcedar, hlee1169, BachFan, Pacifist, vigilant meerkat, BlueInARedState, Gorette, kestrel9000, KenBee, mrobinson, zesty grapher, global citizen, gpoutney, AllDemsOnBoard, Koleppski, SeekCa, pinkhardhat, Loudoun County Dem, devis1, LillithMc, jnhobbs, jhop7, GeorgeXVIII, leonard145b, MKinTN, mconvente, OleHippieChick, Sixty Something, bythesea, skohayes, ajr111240, carver, Gemina13, luckylizard, Karl Rover, JamieG from Md, jlms qkw, rubyclaire, divineorder, juca, ewmorr, Sarge in Seattle, maryabein, indres, oxfdblue, lastman, Ibis Exilis, sfarkash, Larsstephens, Lefty Ladig, Railfan, smileycreek, Prairie Gal, Orlaine, mjbleo, gulfgal98, paulacvdw, Texnance, ericlewis0, cocinero, stevenaxelrod, Berliner2, annieli, Bob Duck, sfcouple, Mr MadAsHell, Possiamo, FarWestGirl, mikejay611, PorridgeGun, sethtriggs, thomask, BarackStarObama, CorinaR, Liberal Mole, Wood Dragon, jolux, VeloVixen, DRo, caryltoo, ParkRanger, Monsieur Georges, IndieGuy, pimutant, JGibson, investorb, mapamp, ivy redneck, supercereal, BusyinCA, bewareofme, burnt out, pittie70, wxorknot, rat racer, scilicet, hungeski, Marjmar, Bisbonian, Adam AZ, Blue Dream, Late Again, Says Who, Maianewley, Asgard, howabout, Kay Observer2, SC Lib

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site