The question has been asked “Is it possible for Mitt Romney to contribute to a traditional IRA and accumulate a \$100 million in his account by age 65?” As they say on Faux News “some say yes and some say no”. I am not an accountant and I don’t play one on television, but I do read and I can add. There are several nuances that come into play in calculating IRA contributions and earnings and your mileage and my assumptions may vary. To calculate how much you will have at the end of a given time period we need to take a history lesson.

The IRA program started in 1974 with the enactment of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). At that time the maximum amount allowed as an IRA contribution was \$1500 from tax year 1975 to 1981, \$2k from 1982 to 2001, \$3k from 2002 to 2003, \$4k from 2004 to 2007, and \$5k from 2008 to today. An additional \$250 could be contributed for a non-working spouse (no cracks about Ann, raising children and a horse is hard work) and an additional \$1k since 2006 for what is called a catch-up after you reach age 50 for a maximum contribution of \$6k each calendar year on earned income per taxpayer. 1974 until last tax year (2011) would only give him 38 years in which to contribute, invest and grow his portfolio. Not enough time to accumulate \$100 million (we really don’t know how large it is because we haven’t seen his tax returns) in a “traditional IRA”. As you can see there are a lot of variables, but we can approximate earnings for each of the years and assume maximum contributions to get close enough for politics.

If he contributed the maximum allowable, plus catch-up and spouse contributions during those 38 years to a personal IRA he could only have contributed about \$115,750, the maximum allowable by the IRS and possibly earned \$727,625.56 since the 1975 tax year assuming 10% earnings each year for a total IRA value of \$843,375.56. Again these numbers could vary wildly, depending on your methodology and investment abilities. As I said before your mileage may vary. Yes, I know that there are many in America that may have exceeded the 10% earnings level for some of those years and others that would put their dog on the roof of their car to earn 10% during the Bush years, but we know anecdotally that Mittens has greatly exceeded our wildest expectations. There are certainly millions that would like to have that hypothetical \$843k nest egg to retire on. As I said before we have to start somewhere and make assumptions. We will give him the benefit of the doubt that he does know how to invest (that’s what he calls it). As a point of reference the median IRA balance in 2008 was \$70k, only 6.3% had balances of \$250k or more. Mittens is in rarified territory here (5000 times the median IRA valuation). He is truly a certifiable 1% poster child.

Those maximum contribution and earnings numbers are nowhere near the numbers that have been circulating around about his IRA, so if he did it then “how did he do it”? Being in the “vulture capital” business he undoubtedly had access to some “creative” methods to “value” assets he placed in a “self-directed” IRA portfolio. So much for your blind trust story Mitt. An IPO for instance valued at \$10 when purchased by an insider like Mitt could be placed into his IRA. Let the miracles of “growth” happen and the IRA is worth hundreds of times its initial value. It helps to know people or be in the right place at the right time (wink, wink). He could also take advantage of a 401k or SEP rollover into his traditional IRA. All very legal and advantageous because they have higher contribution and income level caps, thus allowing larger purchases of higher growth assets to be placed into his portfolio. If we were to stipulate that he indeed has a very large IRA (\$10-\$100 million depending on where you get your data) then you probably know why he doesn’t want you to see his tax returns. The tax dodges and shelters may not work if the rest of us know and attempt to use them.

He is “running for President for Pete’s sake” and it might be embarrassing for hundreds (hopefully thousands) of accountants and attorneys out here examining multiple years of his tax returns. An examination the IRS would never have the resources to perform. Who knows how many “shortcuts”, only available to the 1%, we would discover. They may not be strictly illegal, but for a church going Mormon he may not want his family to know where there money comes from. Could it be as Harry Reid’s source has claimed that Mittens hasn’t paid any taxes or could it be there are some very shady holdings he would prefer to keep hidden? There could be investments that even the GOP would be ashamed of (it’s hard to imagine). We may never know and it’s for sure Mitt isn’t going give it up, at least not until he is elected. I apologize for that image.

#### Tags

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
 Unpublish Diary (The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.) Delete Diary (The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

#### Comment Preferences

• ##### Took a bit of research and a little ink(8+ / 0-)

to get to these conclusions.  Thanks for taking the time to do it.  Just another question upon which we will probably never get an answer.

• ##### Clearly the contrived financial instrument(3+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
maybeeso in michigan, Chi, marykk

that he created in order to game the system needs to be clearly reported to the press. This is a mockery of our tax laws, even though I'm sure it isn't prosecutable--his lawyers are presumably very good.

“liberals are the people who think that cruelty is the worst thing that we do” --Richard Rorty

• ##### Maybe we need a law that makes the total(1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
marykk

perversion of the intent of tax laws prosecutable.

And something about statute of limitations that goes from when the perversion was discovered.

Nothing in the world is more dangerous than a sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. Martin Luther King, Jr.

• ##### Well he COULD have(1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
marykk

"rolled" retirement plans from is various employers into IRAs. Also, there is no limit to growth within the IRAs. In  Bain, Olympic, and Governor jobs he might well have had certain pieces of "insider" info that helped him invest lucratively.

In a word, it IS possible, but certainly unusual.

• ##### you are a lot more charitable than I am.(1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
Mother Shipper

If you think you're too small to be effective, you've never been in the dark with a mosquito.

[ Parent ]

• ##### If you do the math it's like(1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
marykk

29% compound interest year after year. Or, more likely, it's portfolio realignment through the retrospectoscope as Ol' Retroactive Mitt is prone to do.