Skip to main content

Since the days when Massachusetts Governor Willard Mitt Romney wanted to experiment with ways to help welfare recipients substitute training for "workfare" requirements, the federal government has been giving states waivers to carry out modifications. The Obama administration has granted waivers, and now the Director of the Office of Family Assistance has   issued a Policy Memorandum   offering guidelines on how the states could request waivers to substitute vocational training and educational efforts for the workfare requirement associated with so-called “welfare reform.”

Republicans quickly claimed that Obama signed an executive order that abolished work requirements and gutted welfare reform.  Executive orders have the force of law, and
Republican publicists claimed that this order was unconstitutional and tyrannical. The odd thing is that the HHS suggestions parallel those made by Romney and the Republican governors in 2005 as well as legislation then proposed by Senator Charles Grassley.

This Republican effort to claim that President Barack Obama protects welfare chiselers is an old and effective tactic going back to Ronald Reagan’s invented stories of “ welfare queens” driving new Cadillacs to pick up their checks. Newt Gingrich, an expert in demagoguery, called Obama the “food stamp president.”  Romney is now saying Obama encourages a “culture of dependency,” which are code words for an appeal to soft racism, the idea that African American culture is inferior. One wonders if the charges Romney’s forces make  would have been as effective were Obama Caucasian. Playing to prejudice against the poor and minorities is a tried and true way of activating the Republican base and influencing some so-called independent voters.

(Thanks to several alert readers, Big Chuck has been able to offer this improvement of the August 7 diary.)

Mitt Romney accepted all the extreme distortions and now claims that Obama has "gutted welfare reform." He launched an ad claiming that Obama is dismantling welfare reform.    In the past, Romney has offered so many massive distortions, that it is difficult to grasp how any reasonable person could accept his claims. At one time he said that Barack Obama deliberately followed policies he knew would damage the country. How does one know that? This is no different from the crazed Birther claims of so many others on the Right. If Romney were not running against a man who has been systematically demonized, some reasonable observers might wonder if the Republican candidate had not slipped so far into solipsism ass to become a serial liar.
 FOX News says the ”executive order” was unconstitutional.  More people watch Fox than the other cable networks because they prefer anger, distortions, and opinion to fairness and facts.  The Wall Street Journal editorial page announced that Obama has ended welfare reform. In a widely published op-ed, the head of the American Enterprise Institute avoided some of the full package of lies but warned that disaster was on the horizon and that the   the new policy greatly weakened welfare reform. In fact, there is no evidence of a new policy. The Obama administration seems to be granting waivers in the same manner as its predecessors.
None of these claims are true, and that is why the charges lack specifics of any kind. But the charges are “out there”  are likely to stick because so many Americans have ugly feelings about the poor and minorities. In a timed of multiple crises and insecurity, many people feel better about themselves when they can contrast their virtuous selves with those they think are trying to game the system. Or, as Romney said about some blacks who did not warm to his message, they want to “get free stuff” from the government.
We are no longer a Puritan nation, except in one respect. We work longer and harder than most other peoples, and we are very much into the Protestant work ethic. Sociological studies show that the more we buy the Protestant ethic, the more likely we are to harbor prejudice against minorities and the poor. Similarly, the strong believers in the work ethic are more likely to oppose welfare and even the social safety net. This is one reason why so many oppose Affordable Care; they cannot handle the idea that the poor and minorities might benefit.
Of course, the Protestant Work Ethic has been blended with Social Darwinism, and a truly ugly cocktail has emerged.  The latter postulates that people on the bottom of society are there because they are lazy and incompetent. Related to this belief is the revived notion that these people do not deserve the right to vote. It is astonishing that most Americans seem to accept the new vote suppression measures. If you ask a supporter why, he will say these people are too lazy to vote and that it is very simple to meet the new registration requirements. No amount of information will persuade him otherwise.
Social Darwinism has become so strong that it is impossible to have an honest discussion of so-called welfare reform.  Since 1996, it has made it possible to slash the welfare rolls by half.  It has also brought down the wages of many other Americans who have had to compete with people who had no choice but to work for whatever was offered them.  Welfare reform is tied to block grants which do not increase annually with the rate of inflation. The result is that the sates find ways to take more and more people off the rolls. This is the same approach that is being envisioned for the rapid reduction of Medicaid costs.
Ruth Conniff recently wrote about the "Rich-Poor Alliance" in The Progressive. She noted that the ten poorest counties in Wisconsin strongly supported the retention of rightist Governor Scott Walker. The working poor and many in the middle class look down on those below them. They see themselves as virtuous, hard workers. They usually are. But they somehow think that if less were done for the poor that they would thrive.
Conniff notes that the poor and many blue collar folks greatly resent teachers and public employees. They believe that public employees and teachers are privileged because they have fairly decent incomes, health care, and pensions. It is almost conventional wisdom that teachers work little and are not committed to what they do. Even many unionized workers in the private sector joined in the resentment of unionized public workers and supported a Republican regime that will  eventually move against all unions in Wisconsin.
These days, it is not unusual to hear parents or siblings of teachers insist that teachers should be stripped of their pensions. Worried and distracted people gain some comfort in lashing out at people who allegedly do not play by the rules of the Protestant work ethic, the poor, minorities, and now public employees.  
Many poor and blue collar folks backed Scott Walker when he broke the public employee and teacher unions. They cheered when pensions were attacked. The same occurred in Minnesota, where the attack on pensions was ever more sweeping. In Ohio, Governor John Kasick was actually elected by denouncing the greedy and lazy teachers. Oddly, some teachers voted for  him.
 In Pennsylvania, Governor Tom Corbett wants to slash the pensions of retired teachers and public employees, and he has widespread support. Even some retired teachers seem willing to sacrifice income for their party. At a recent gathering of long retired teachers, an activist was prevented from warning his colleagues about Governor Corbett’s intention because some of Corbett’s backers there would be offended.  
The many crises we face make people insecure. As Konrad Lorenz, the Austrian scientist, noted over 60 years ago, many people need emotional solace even more than economic security. Many worried and threatened people gain solace and a sense of self-worth by loathing and injuring the dreaded “Other” and picturing themselves as part of the victimized “real Americans.” Lorenz suggested that these people need simple conventional wisdom to get through life. They have problems facing complexity and painful realities. This is why so many ordinary people will persist in voting against their own best interests.

So long as people are fearful or terrorism, pluralism, recession, and status loss, Republicans will probably be able to rely on the "rich-poor alliance" and the resentment so many have for the poor, minorities, and, now,  public workers
Conniff quoted a local Wisconsin politician who said, "We have one party that is scary, and another that is scared." To their credit, the Wisconsin Democrats tried to attack Scott Walker and his minions. Elsewhere, Democrats seem so scared that they are saying little in hopes of saving their seats. They should be calling out the Republicans and reminding the middle class and poor that they stand to loose much if Republicans win in November.
TAGS

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Hate, fear, and race-baiting. It's all they've got (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    happymisanthropy

    ...in your modern Republican party.

    After all, their economic ideas are exactly, precisely what got us into our current calamitous recession. Sort of like treating a fevery by setting the patient on fire.

    Their foreign policy ideas? Demonizing Russia again? Trying to foment a new Cold War with China? The party that ignored screaming warning signs of 9/11 and then let Bin-Ladin escape?

    Global warming denialism? More tax breaks for Exxon?

    They got nuthin' but the hating on brown people. That and "Obama's gonna take your gunz".

  •  This election is all about racism (0+ / 0-)

    The republicans started this war w/ Atwater and the southern strategy. It's worked well for them for 40 yrs. All the crap about states rights is just that crap. Everyone one of the constitutions of the civil war states stressed slavery. The KKK history here is undeniable. In the south, that makes a claim for its heritage, it's been an easy road to hoe to convince whites of their impending demise. They wear their ignorance like a badge of courage. I live in WNC and the KKK, racism and ignorance are alive and well.

    With the development of the christian right we discover the elements of code words like family values or more explicitly - abortion. Both of these are intended to keep minorities from gaining freedom from the oppression of poverty. It doesn't matter that a few of your own are caught in the same position as the minorities.

    The development for voter ID's is another tactic to keep minorities from voting by making it more difficult. Even if a few WW2 veterans or old white ladies are caught up in the mix it's a small price to pay

    Pat buchanan recently opined that the GOP is imperiled by the decline of the white population.  Who better could have said something like this than the old racist himself.  He openly admitted that the party is RACIST - some christian.  (Too many of his beloved brethren believe like him)  This election is about the last gasp of a party that has for the last 40 yrs ruled rather ineptly and has won over the population of the south especially, with fear and lies.

    Welfare, in the mind of many whites is inexorably tied to blacks.  However, the majority of welfare recipients are white. "Some 61 percent of welfare recipients are White, while 33 percent are Black, according to 1990 Census Bureau statistics, the latest figures available."  We can easily add to the list the infamous Gingrich comments calling Obama the food stamp president.  Romney himself lies when he tries to paint Obama’s attempt to fine tune TANF as a “plan to gut welfare” by dropping working requirement. According to Ron Haskins a former Republican -who was key to crafting welfare reform in the 1990s - it's a lie.

    Romney can't run on his own credentials. There are certainly doubts about his Bain record, his tax record, (some Mormans are wondering if he only tithed a fraction of a fraction of his net worth),  his health care record and IMO his title as 'savior' of the 2002 olympics. He didn't get private business to back this ridiculous concept (olympics) he got a government bailout. The records, which were to be transparent, ended up at BYU and the Mormon church. Both institutions not exactly known for transparency. (We'll never see the complete set of documents)
    We follow that up w/ mittens statements during and after his NAACP speech, his wife's "you people" comment and finally, the continuing and expanding lies of Obama's statements, the latter both exposed by AP and FactCheck.

    No, white America's fears have come home to roost in the lies and distortions developed by the GOP.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site