But during an appearance on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Gingrich was presented with the actual text of the Department of Health and Human Services regulation that the administration is adopting, and had to acknowledge that the directive, as written, doesn’t gut welfare. “None of us believe them,” was all Gingrich could say.
Think Progress
So, Poltifact and WashPo alleged checkers of facts:
You took Harry Reid to task because there was "no evidence" that anyone told him Romney didn't pay 10 years of taxes ... although there was no evidence the other way as well. Now, the odious Newt has admitted there is "no evidence" to support Romney's ad, which he has been relentlessly flogging.
Is sauce for a goose sauce for a gander? Or does "bipartisan" mean Romney gets to spend millions lying through his perfectly white teeth without penalty, while Reid gets to be slammed for saying what is plausibly true?