Skip to main content

Frayed pink ribbon of Susan G. Komen
We did it, ladies (and friends of ladies).

In February, Susan G. Komen for the Cure demanded that we make a choice: the pink stuff or Planned Parenthood. Komen had caved to political pressure from the anti-choice movement that demanded Komen stop its funding of breast cancer screening and education at Planned Parenthood. Pressure came from outside groups as well as from Karen Handel, the foundation's senior vice president of public policy and failed Republican candidate for governor of Georgia (endorsed by Sarah Palin). Komen decided that the war on Planned Parenthood—one of the principal goals of the Republican Party—was more important than providing health care for women. Even worse, Komen's board knew it was a bad idea, as an internal review had concluded that cutting off funding to Planned Parenthood would be a very bad decision indeed:

Participants concluded that cutting off all funds would endanger low-income women who depended on the service. A partial cutoff would only compromise the integrity of the grants process and not be enough to satisfy critics, participants said. Staff members decided to recommend continued funding for Planned Parenthood.
“It was our recommendation that we stay the course,” [former senior communications advisor John] Hammerly said. “We thought there could also be significant concern, both from a public standpoint and an affiliate standpoint, if we ceased support.”
But the anti-choicers at Komen didn't care, and they forced the board to accept this devastating new policy, insisting that women would choose their pink slippers and spatulas over Planned Parenthood.

And they were wrong. They were very wrong:

The foundation's leadership seemed completely unprepared for the national outrage at the blatantly obvious politicization of breast cancer and women's health. Karen Handel, the foundation's senior vice president of public policy and failed Republican candidate for governor of Georgia (endorsed by Sarah Palin), echoed the "cry me a river" response from fervent anti-choicers on Twitter—a tweet that was deleted, but not before an image was taken and spread far and wide across the Internet.

Komen founder and CEO Nancy Brinker then took to the airwaves to offer a whole new excuse for cutting the funding, insisting that the decision was not political, and tsk-tsking critics, whom she insisted didn't know what they were talking about and needed to "pause" and "slow down." Translation: Stop criticizing us for siding with an anti-woman agenda instead of with women. And keep buying our pink crap!

That did not go over too well either.

Next, the Komen Foundation released an apology for its decision, which the traditional media (and, sadly, even many alternative media sources, including feminist writers) inaccurately reported as a reversal of the foundation's new policy. Additional conversations with members of the foundation's board confirmed that it had not reversed its policy; rather, the apology was a further attempt to salvage its all-but-destroyed brand, chastise critics, and make the whole PR disaster go away.

Within the week, Karen Handel had resigned. But the damage done to Komen's brand, and the devastation within the organization, was far from over. Executives and board members kept resigning, the charity was struggling to raise money and was even forced to cancel events, and a "Komen insider" told Huffington Post that "employee morale is in the toilet," and that Nancy Brinker was "in complete meltdown [...] People want her to resign but she won't."

This week, the bloodbath continued Komen President Liz Thompson announced her resignation, two more members of the board resigned, and as for Nancy "in complete meltdown" Brinker—well, she will "shift to a new management role as chair of the Komen Board Executive Commiittee when the search for a new senior executive is finished."  

Susan G. Komen for the Cure demanded that women make a choice. And women made it. And the answer could not be clearer: If you force women to choose between Planned Parenthood and something else, that something else will lose every time. Women and their allies stood up and said no—hell no—and sent a strong message to Komen and to anyone else who tries to come between us and the nation's biggest provider of our health care.

Goal Thermometer

Feels good to win, doesn't it? Feels awesome, in fact, and makes you want more. The Daily Kos community should take a bow—readers, diarists and activists here were instrumental in focusing on the latest news about the issue, spreading word and actions throughout social media, putting pressure on sponsors, donating to Planned Parenthood, writing letters to the editor to send the loud-and-clear message that we stand with Planned Parenthood.

It looks like Komen got the message.

Please donate $3 to help keep Daily Kos strong, fired up and ready to go for whatever battle is coming next in the War on Women. We learned how important immediate, responsive activism can be in making a difference on issues we care about. If they bring it on, we'll be ready.

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Sat Aug 11, 2012 at 09:00 AM PDT.

Also republished by Pro Choice, Sluts, and Abortion.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site