Skip to main content

Leading up to the November election, we have seen and will see continued mentioning of an often romanticized view of America. What's that, you ask? It's the return of those traditional American values. In his Saturday vice presidential announcement speech, Mitt Romney uttered the following absurd thing:

Our country was founded on the principle that our rights did not come from the government. They came from the creator.
What are these traditional values that Romney wants to restore? And why are people cheering at the mention of this bizarrely backward American vision?

Romney is not the only person in the conservative party touting the virtues of traditional America. In fact, this has long been the calling card of the evangelical agitators. Take alleged casino fraud perpetrator and Christian Coalition founder Ralph Reed, who chided Christians with:

If we get down on our faces and our knees before Almighty God, and we beg of him, not because we're pointing fingers at anybody else, but because of what we have allowed to happen... then I believe in November God will have mercy on our land and we will have a Renaissance of the values that made this country great.
How must an African-American feel reading this quote? Exactly which "values" of the past made our country great? Are we going back to 1770, when our society saw fit to steal human beings from their home continent in order to work in brutally hot plantations? Or how about 1860, when half of the country was so married to the idea that they chose to fight a bloody civil war to protect their "rights?" How about the good values that covered the next 100 years and change, as we relegated those former slaves to second-hand status based on color alone? If I'm a member of a minority, I want to know exactly what period of history we are trying to jump back into. Just which period in American history did we get it right in God's eyes?

Romney's comments are striking for their cultural insensitivity. If America was truly founded on the principle that God grants people their rights, then is Romney implying that black people and women were just not the big guy's favorite at that time? For those individuals, the assertion that the founding fathers' human rights plan was the right plan must seem callous.

This goes to two problems - one critical to Mitt Romney and another critical to the entire conservative camp. First, Romney shows again that he's so self-absorbed that he can't fathom the idea that someone else might have had a different experience than him. After all, if you were a rich white guy, the founding fathers gave you a pretty good deal. The lack of empathy is striking but not surprising.

The second speaks to a problem seen in all aspects of conservative politics, from Capitol Hill to the recesses of the Supreme Court. That problem is an insulting romanticism of American founding principles.

The American founders shouldn't be vilified. In fact, they got a lot of things right. The Constitution is a beautifully written document that featured an inspiring amount of foresight. The zeal and unflappable bravery shown by the founding fathers is something that all Americans can emulate. But there has to be some balance between a scathing review of the founding fathers and the romantic view often put forth by leaders on the right. America's founding was helped by brutal indifference to human life in the pursuit of capitalistic greed. We chose to actively exterminate American Indians in a dramatic move West, forcing the lucky survivors onto small, unwanted plots of land in places like Oklahoma, South Dakota, and New Mexico.

Why must we lie about the quality of the early American values? Why not simply admit that we got a lot of things right, while missing on quite a few others? Then we can take pride in a real American value - the ability of our society to adapt and evolve. We can celebrate the progress made on a host of civil rights issues, from minority voting to women's employment to the expanding acceptance of LGBT rights. It is those values that we can all be proud of, and it is those values we can use to press into the future. By looking back with uncompassionate appreciation on the often-brutal early years, we alienate many of the people who make this country worth celebrating.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  All of this flows from David Barton, president of (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Grizzard, LaFeminista, Smoh, SuWho

    Wallbuilders and the Right's Goebbels who distorts history to fit his own purposes.  his fortunes waned recently when he was decimated on NPR and also had his most recent book pulled by the publisher.
    In any other society, this Clown Prince of Things Historical would have been laughed from the public stage years ago. Only in America, does lying not only profit the liar, but the larger and more audacious the lie, the more profitable it is for the liar

  •  Methinks if there is a creator he/she is (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    mommyof3, Smoh, Kiterea, SuWho

    totally bemused.

    "Another world is not only possible, she is on her way. On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing." Arundhati Roy

    by LaFeminista on Sun Aug 12, 2012 at 01:48:36 AM PDT

  •  What would Jesus carry? eom (0+ / 0-)
  •  Traditional values: Native American genocide, (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Dixiedemocrat, Smoh

    slavery, only white male property owners permitted to vote, crony capitalism (seriously, just read about the career of John Hancock)...

    Yep. Like Weird Al Yankovich sings:

    "We call it tradition, 'cuz that makes it okay; happy weasel-stomping day!"

  •  Really? (0+ / 0-)

    Since you ask, rhetorically, what a black person would think after hearing that quote, I would recommend asking a few. Frankly, it's a stretch to come to the conclusions that you have, so asking around might add a little perspective.

    We have important political and policy challenges ahead of us, and this imaginative reading between the lines lowers the bar of political discourse when we need to do the opposite.

    •  Mellisa Harris-Perry (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Kiterea, gfv6800, SuWho

      An African-American, female contributor to MSNBC allowed Romney's comments to simmer for about 5 minutes before she lit into him on this exact same point.

      There's no imaginative reading here. What's said opens a portal into Romney's mind and the assumptions the lie behind his policy-making and decision-making.

      It goes to the role of government, the very entity that Romney and Ryan think has little use.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site