Skip to main content

The free exchange of ideas is critical to representative government and was one of the reasons why the US Postal Service(USPS) was created. At its founding the Postal Service had a deliberate policy of subsidizing the mailing of newspapers and other periodicals, precisely to encourage the communication of ideas. The importance of this was understood by President George Washington who signed the bill authorizing the US Postal Service in 1792. The idea of a postal service is enshrined in the US Constitution.

George Washington stamp

Despite its historic role in the free exchange of ideas, the U.S. Postal Service is under attack.

Republicans in Congress have taken aim at the Postal Service. They have been aided and abetted by Democrats who have remained silent, or like the current Postmaster General, even cave in to some of their demands. Congressional Republicans have created a thoroughly artificial financial crisis within the Postal Service to push for rate hikes, massive cutbacks in service and the closure of many small town and neighborhood post offices. Their ultimate goal is to privatize the USPS.

Critics of the Postal Service claim that if privatized its competitors like UPS and FedEx can take up the slack. This is ridiculous. The USPS is a universal service that goes everywhere, including many places that UPS and FedEd do not. Its package delivery is less expensive for small businesses and better for shipping internationally. FedEx even uses the Postal Service to deliver to customers not covered by its own fleet. 

Mail Truck

Critics also maintain that the Post Service has been made by obsolete by the Internet. Yet as of 2011, 30% of the urban population and 40% of the rural population do not have broadband Internet. US broadband is also slower and less reliable compared with many other nations. But even if 100% of Americans had modern broadband Internet, this does not remove the need for the Postal Service.

The Internet is largely private property where freedom of expression is not guaranteed. Facebook can suspend user accounts and pages. Twitter can censor tweets. YouTube can remove videos. Websites can be deleted by the private companies that host them. Internet content is delivered (or not) by huge corporate telcoms. 

 Print is not dead and has its own particular advantages

Printed works are more portable than Internet-based communication and if printed properly, can last a very long time. Many people prefer to read longer and more thoughtful writing on paper. Once you own a printed copy of something, it won’t disappear because a web server blew up, hackers wrecked it, a government censored it or the website owner zapped it for their own reasons. Print makes it easier to have numerous backup copies. Both print and the electronic media have their advantages and disadvantages.

At a time when people are concerned about Internet security and all forms of idea exchange are subject to interference, it’s best to have as many ways to communicate as possible. This is especially true in the USA where political literacy is low and the means of communication is being concentrated in fewer and fewer corporate hands.

Encouraging the free exchange of ideas is more important than making a profit.

Over the years, the USPS has been forced to raise the rates for mailing periodicals to the point where smaller publications have curtailed or even suspended operations. Smaller publications are where new and unpopular ideas are first tested out. If we are serious about democracy, then the USPS should be lowering postal rates for periodicals and books to encourage reading and the exchange of ideas. It won’t make a profit, but so what?

The Congressional Republicans are strangely quiet about how their efforts to strangle the Post Service will affect American democracy. This is especially odd considering their supposed reverence for the “Founding Fathers” who to one degree or another realized that the free exchange of ideas was critical to representative government, even if they were suspicious of actual democracy.  We subsidize oil companies. Why not subsidize democracy?

Attacks on the USPS did not begin with the present crop of Congressional Republicans

There have been numerous times when the free exchange of ideas by mail has been attacked. One of the most egregious was directed against the USA‘s first known direct mail campaign. The mailing organizers were not hawking credit cards, insurance schemes, or political candidates. They were promoting freedom and democracy. 

Their shipment of direct mail arrived at the Charleston, South Carolina harbor on July 29, 1835. Not knowing exactly what to do with the many sacks of mail, Postmaster Alfred Huger set them aside. That evening a mob broke in, stole the mail and the next evening burned every piece in a mass demonstration that attracted a crowd of at least 2000 people.

The mail consisted of unsolicited literature advocating the abolition of slavery, sent by the American Anti-Slavery Society (AAS). They were addressed to individuals whose names were a matter of public record. No one was ever prosecuted for this theft and destruction of US mail. 

Pro slavery mob

A pro-slavery mob burning abolitionist mail 

The Postmaster General of the USA ignored the blatant violation of federal laws and ruled that in this case “states rights” prevailed. President Andrew Jackson, still celebrated by some as a great “man of the people”, introduced legislation that would have banned abolitionists from sending mail to the southern slave states, although Congress eventually decided it did not have the power to that.  Throughout the South vigilance committees were established to monitor the mails for any possible abolitionist literature and punish anyone caught with it. Where the force of law failed, state sponsored terrorism was always available. 

 Slave owners were the power behind racist mobs and politicians

The term "totalitarian" is normally used to describe a dictatorial government that subordinates the individual to its power. But I believe it can also accurately describe individual economic enterprises and how they are organized. By this description, each southern plantation was its own unique totalitarian institution. Taken together, they were a vast gulag of slave labor camps and the most powerful economic enterprises of their time. As a result plantation owners put a totalitarian stamp on American politics for much of our early history. Their reliance on slavery was associated with institutional racism, white supremacy, massive human rights abuses, ethnic cleansing, environmental destruction, militarism and territorial imperialism. It eventually resulted in the Civil War, which cost upwards of 750,000 American lives.

For the slave owners, tampering with the US mail to crush democracy was all in a day’s work. But of course abolitionists( a despised minority even in the North), continued to use the US mails where they could, until the time came when abolition of slavery finally became national policy. 

But even the slaveholders did not attempt to actually shut down the Postal Service  when they went to war with it. The modern effort to destroy the Postal Service through deep cutbacks and eventual privatization is coming from a Congress molded by the power of corporate wealth.The modern corporation that began to emerge after the Civil War was the successor to the slave plantation as the USA’s most dominant economic institution. 

 Like the slave plantations before them, the power of today’s corporate wealth  weakens our democracy

The modern corporation is normally organized in a topdown totalitarian manner.The corporation is a place that even Bloomberg Businessweek says is “where free speech goes to die.” Most Americans simply accept this as without question because corporate property is “private” property. How much American political culture is molded by the habits of obedience formed by working within totalitarian corporations is something that deserves further study.

There are corporations who are reasonably benign and even supportive of democratic values, but there are others who have a dark association with extreme violence, white supremacy, environmental destruction, discrimination by race and gender, sweatshop labor, catastrophic financial fraud, war and other serious abuses. 

The corporate powered postal “reformers” in the money-soaked company town of Washington DC want to avoid any discussion of the democratic values that the Postal Service is supposed to uphold. How committed are the most powerful US corporations to the free exchange of ideas that is so critical to a democracy? Not very committed if one measures the amount of support they give the US Postal Service in its funding crisis.

Perhaps that is because corporate lobbying groups like the US Chamber of Commerce, the Business Roundtable, and the American Petroleum Institute want to ensure that their propaganda messages dominate American thinking. That is consistent with the corporate drive to privatize education, dominate the mass media, crush what remains of the US labor movement and overwhelm their electoral opponents with the sheer force of money. 

 There is another reason for the hostility toward the USPS: The American postal worker

American postal workers are diverse, a true face of the USA. They live in urban, rural and suburban areas. They include both men and women. They come from many different ethnic backgrounds and have had a variety of life experiences. They live in every state and US territory. They belong to unions and make a decent living which includes benefits like retirement and vacation time.

Postal workers

Through their unions they have a voice at the workplace and in the halls of political power. They can go to a union meeting and discuss issues that affect their lives and take action with other postal workers.They represent the dream that all working class people should have a comfortable living standard and a powerful voice in public affairs.

From the point of view of the corporate elites, US Postal Service employees with their living standards and their unions, set a bad example for the rest of the working class. Today’s corporate agenda for working class America seems to be low wages, temporary jobs, no benefits, no job security, no voice at work, a limited voice in public affairs and no unions. 

This is very dangerous to democracy because it creates a society with a vast gap between rich and poor. This feeds the social desperation that grows anti-democratic totalitarian political movements. It is also is a major factor in creating economic crashes such as this country had in 1929 and 2008, which also feed totalitarian movements of social desperation. Unions are an important part of modern democracies and the postal unions stand as living examples of that.

 Your local post office is an essential part of the infrastructure of our democracy.

Perhaps it's time for us to recognize our local post office for what it is, an essential part of the infrastructure for democracy. Perhaps we need to thank our postal workers for being who they really are: peaceful warriors for the democratic exchange of ideas. Perhaps it’s also time for us to reflect on how committed we are to democratic values and if we are willing to defend them. Defending your local post office would be a good place to begin.

Sources Consulted

 America’s First Direct Mail Campaign by  Nancy Pope

 Abolitionism by Reyna Eisentark

 Democratic Discourses  by Michael Bennett

 George Washington signs the Postal Service Act

 The Postal Service Is Essential to Democracy by John Nichols

 How Cuts To USPS Threaten American Democracy by Trisha Marczak

 Mail Matters by Richard R. John

 A Prospective Raise in Postal Rates Riles Magazines by Jeremy W. Peters

 The Manufactured "Financial Crisis" of the U.S. Postal Service by Ralph Nader

 Digital Age Is Slow to Arrive in Rural America by Kim Severson

 Where Free Speech Goes to Die: The Workplace by  Michael Dolgow




Originally posted to BobboSphere on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 04:43 AM PDT.

Also republished by In Support of Labor and Unions.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Well done. (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    TimmyB, rbird, martini, BobboSphere

    As for Republican's

    supposed reverence for the “Founding Fathers”
    Well, they have no reverence for anything. This is just a little baiting the base.

    This better be good. Because it is not going away.

    by DerAmi on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 05:10:12 AM PDT

  •  Red and Blue (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Sark Svemes, martini

    First thanks for the great diary.

    Now my almost useless bit of trivia that seems to have been forgotten. Mailboxes used to be red and blue until Vietnam war protesters started painting gold stars on them making them look like the North Vietnamese flag. That bit of free speech was not allowed. People were arrested for defacing the boxes and they changed them to all blue to stop the practice.

    It is possible to read the history of this country as one long struggle to extend the liberties established in our Constitution to everyone in America. - Molly Ivins

    by se portland on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 05:47:54 AM PDT

  •  No it's not. (0+ / 0-)

    There are lots of reasons why it's cool to have a quasigovernmental postal service but that's no longer one of them.

    Mitt Romney '12: Berlusconi without the sex and alcohol!

    by Rich in PA on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 06:17:16 AM PDT

  •  USPS Discussion on The Majority Report (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Sark Svemes, martini, BobboSphere

    Your diary on this topic is very good
    On 7/25, Sam Seder had a discussion on The Majority Report about USPS

  •  Love the USPS (8+ / 0-)

    Something to point out: Privacy

    USPS: Your letter or package cannot be opened without a warrant. We are 'secure in our papers'.

    The other shipping companies can and will open your packages and you just have to bend over and take it.The UPS store, Mail Boxes Etc. can open your packages. You have no recourse.

    Cost? The USPS is cheap AND reliable.

    I've shipped over 100,000 books and things over the years via the USPS. I only lost 2 books, and one made it back to me, the other arrived at the buyer a few weeks later (I had put the wrong zip code on it).

    RIP Will Beinlich 1993-2011 (Just 1 more game, please....)

    by Sark Svemes on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 06:25:25 AM PDT

    •  Excellent point (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      marina, lonespark

      No means of communication is completely secure from privacy invasions but at least the legal protections offered by our postal laws make the authorities jump through a few hoops. I believe this privacy was built into the original conception of the Postal Service.

      "Don't believe everything you think."

      by BobboSphere on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 07:12:53 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  The post office also delivers packages for (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      marina, lonespark, ThirtyFiveUp

      UPS and FEDEX that the corporations find "unprofitable", 25%? or so of UPS & FEDEX packages to rural locations are ultimately delivered by the post office.

      Here is an article I found today that I find interesting:

      It would help low-income people have a place to stash their money, what a terrific vehicle!

      •  Another thought I just had regarding (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        lonespark, BobboSphere

        rural post offices where there is no internet service.....
        the post office could be charged with bringing internet service to the community as a part of their mandate to provide mail service, a natural extention of keeping people informed.  

        Instead of putting aside billions every year for retirees that haven't been born yet and will never be employed by the post office if the conservatives have their way, money could be directed at internet service at a nominal charge to locals through the post office.  Our public library does a terrific job of providing access, but many rural areas don't even have libraries.  

        It would provide a mini-boom for rural areas and maybe they wouldn't be so "red" if they had other sources of information.  

  •  Post Office and Voter ID (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    martini, BobboSphere, marina, lonespark

    One of the things I find interesting is that the same folks pushing for Voter ID laws are the folks pushing to destroy the Post Office.

    To get a Voter ID (or renew a Driver's License) you generally must provide proof of your address -- a bank statement or bill mailed to you.

    What happens without a Post Office?

    Will e-mailed statements satisfy government requirements?  I doubt it -- they're too easy to edit and/or fake.

    How about something sent via UPS, FedEx, etc.?  Everywhere I've lived delivery services are more than happy to leave whatever they are delivering on the front steps.  Making it very easy to send something to someone else's address.  Then just pick it up off the porch before they get home.

    How will the government satisfy it's desire to know where we live if they abolish the post office?  Establish some new department for that purpose?  How much will that cost?

  •  We need the USPS nt (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    martini, David54, BobboSphere, marina

    Please feel free to HR me for my informative and argumentative nature. 'To know what is right and to do it are two different things.' - Chushingura, a tale of The Forty-Seven Ronin

    by rbird on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 06:30:28 AM PDT

  •  Republicans hate trains, too. Anything that helps (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    BobboSphere, marina, lonespark

    the "common good", which they actively work to undermine as a treat to their privatization agenda.

    But we already knew that.

    It's sortof an ecological expansion for them.  They've already overfilled their niches (privatized everything that can be done well by business) and are killing off other species (areas where government or just people do best) in their search for new territories to exploit.  

    Trains, Post Offices, Water Departments, food inspectors, the military, "utilities" (how quaint!), etc.  Our minds & thoughts (advertizing & tv & RW think tanks).  Public spaces.  The human genome, and the larger genetic commons.

    What can we do but use the Post Office as much as possible, defeat Republicans, and push Dems to preserve our various commonses?


  •  Think USPS Needs new management... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    The USPS should not be privatized, but it does need new management.

    They've been running if it fits it ships for a few years now.  The inherent problem with this is that fuel is a direct cost of shipping.

    There's no way shipping a package from NY to Philly should cost the same as NYC to LA.

    "And there are those who give and know not pain in giving, nor do they seek joy, nor give with mindfulness of virtue; They give as in yonder valley the myrtle breathes its fragrance into space" Khalil Gibran

    by bcdelta on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 09:46:29 AM PDT

    •  I agree that new management is needed. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      The USPS also needs a new pricing structure and new features. There are a number of suggestions that have been proposed like making all post offices wi-fi hotspots for areas with no broadband access and restoring the postal savings banks among others.

      It has modernized before and could do it again.

      "Don't believe everything you think."

      by BobboSphere on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 11:35:27 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site