Skip to main content

Ok, NBC. You took a lot of crap for your coverage of the 2012 London Summer Olympic Games.

Sure, you spent a ton of money producing literally thousands of hours of event coverage. Your primetime broadcasts received not only the highest ratings ever for an Olympics, but, if I'm not mistaken, collectively over the 2+ weeks, more people watched this Olympics in the United States than any other televised event in US history. The production values were, for the most part, very high, and for that your hard-working camera folks and producers should be commended.

But the shortcomings were real, and myriad, and the criticisms for the most part well-deserved.

But don't let that get you down, NBC. For better or worse, you're stuck with the Olympics through at least 2020, and we're stuck watching you until then. And, if we, the American public, have proven anything during this Olympics, it's that we will watch the Olympics -- lots of it -- and that you can make money showing it to us, even if you spend tons of it to bring us unprecedented amounts of coverage.

So, let's chalk the uneven quality of your primetime broadcasts this time to a 'trial run' of perhaps the first truly global, truly live-streamed (yet, simultaneously, tape-delayed, due in part to factors beyond your control like the rotation of the planet), truly instant, social media Olympics, give you a 'do-over' -- just like Tom Daley, perhaps you were distracted by all the bright lights and attention -- and we'll cheer you on to do much better next time.

You've got a year and a half until Sochi 2014, so there's no time to waste.

Here's a few ideas, in no particular order. This list is neither exhaustive nor authoritative, representing only my own non-expert opinions. Where applicable, I do compliment you on what you did right, and offer constructive criticism for improvements. I understand that broadcasting an Olympics is a herculean task, and I also understand that you can't please everyone all of the time. But, even so, I think you'd agree that there's room for improvement. (EXPAND THIS POST TO READ MORE)

(1) Live-streaming every event in this Olympics was a great idea. How you did it, though, was not always so great.

On TV, you showed a large variety of events live, but the choice of what was broadcast and what was not seemed rather capricious. And hopping around channels was a challenge: random channel numbers, unhelpful and often incorrect on-screen guide descriptions, and no 'ticker' or info-box on any one channel telling you what could be presently found on any other channel. Some super-obscure events were not shown live on TV, and this sort of makes sense given the limited number of channels available on which to simultaneously broadcast. But since you were able to just suddenly create an extra soccer channel and an extra basketball channel for the Olympics, why not work with cable and satellite providers to create a few more next time (given the smaller size of the Winter Olympics, this probably won't matter until 2016, and by that time, I'm sure the technology to do this will be even better)? And then some high profile events were also not shown live on TV. This, to the viewers, was a transparent and greedy attempt to hold back the most lucrative stuff for primetime. But since you show us ads, no matter the time of the day, why not do a better job attracting and measuring viewership whenever it occurs, and working with advertisers to reach us both day and night?

Heck, why not create an on-demand Olympics channel, with clear timetables showing all events, past, present, and future. Let us LIVE-STREAM present events; watch past events from the beginning while they're in progress (Time Warner Cable calls this 'START OVER'), just after they end (REPLAY), and anytime thereafter (ON DEMAND); and easily see and schedule viewing of upcoming events, all on one, easy-to-use on-demand channel?

On other platforms, you provided live-streaming of what literally seemed like dozens of events at once. This was, to your credit, pretty awesome. But viewing them was a little bit less awesome. Logging into the live viewer through my cable company was cumbersome. It worked on some platforms and browsers, but not on others (My Google TV could not use either an Android app or a web browser to stream the Olympics, even though it has a mostly full-fledged, flash-supporting web browser and runs on Android. I can't speak for Apple TV, Roku, Boxee, or Playstation users, but I imagine they encountered similar hurdles.) Most web browsers worked fine, but I'd rather not be glued to my computer screen if I can help it. And the Android app for my phone was, at least for the first week of the Olympics, very buggy (it had a bit-rate error, forcing a full reboot, every several minutes). Perhaps you rolled out some updates, or increased streaming capacity -- good for you! -- because it seemed to be a bit more cooperative by the end of the Games.

But, no matter the platform I used, you separated scores, results, stories, highlight videos, replays, tv listings, and live streams in different and confusing ways. Android, for example, had two separate apps, one for live video, and one for everything else. So it was very difficult to determine whether or not I could watch a video replay of an event I just missed, while also trying to figure out what events I could watch live right now, and on which platforms I could watch them. Switching between the apps wasted time and led to confusion. Switching amongst streams, even after just a few seconds, usually subjected me to another ad roll, further delaying my viewing. How about combining all of these features into one, streamlined app next time (you can use different tabs or pages to hide 'spoilers'), and making sure that commercial breaks, like on TV, are always separated by at least a few minutes -- and that they don't interrupt key moments of events. Make your website and apps look and function similarly, so that switching amongst them is a breeze. Let me see a split-screen with multiple streams at once, so that I can make a more informed choice while jumping around, or even watch more than one simultaneously if that's my style. Heck, since you make me login to use your streams, remember me and my favorite sports, what I'm watching right now and what I want to watch later, and let me seamlessly jump from one platform to another, resuming exactly where I left off. If I miss 2 minutes of live coverage to make a sandwich or boot up my computer, let me pause and resume watching 2 minutes shy of live -- just like on a DVR or on-demand television.

(2) I'm not an idiot. Please don't talk to me like I am. Please don't make dumb jokes about what athletes are wearing, or the names of their countries, or the horrible dictators who used to rule those places. Find smart, informed people to give event commentary, even for the non-sporting events (like the opening and closing ceremonies). Teach me something I didn't know, or just help me to better understand what's going on in front of me. If I want to see dumb jokes, I'll watch a late-night comedy program. Or the Today show. Mercifully, I didn't catch a minute of the Today show during this Olympics, but given its propensity towards fluff the rest of the year, I'm sure it struck a similar tone during the Games. Relegate the silly jokes to 7-9AM, and then again to 11:35PM or later.

(3) This one builds on the previous point. Don't be afraid to spend a few minutes explaining the rules. I think it goes without saying that most Olympic sports are hugely unpopular in the US the other 3 years and 50 weeks that they're not taking international center stage. If I'm watching volleyball, tell me the difference between a dig and a block. Better yet, SHOW me the difference. If I'm watching water polo, explain why there's a whistle being blown every other second. If I'm watching judo, or fencing, or taekwondo, or any other lightning-fast combat sport, show me how points are scored (or not scored). I won't feel demeaned, I'll feel enlightened and informed. Use helpful infographics wherever possible. And exploit the high-speed cameras and state-of-the-art production equipment at your disposal. Show me replays complete with freeze-frames and mark-ups. Show me side-by-sides, comparing one athlete's performance to another's. Yes, you did this throughout the games. But only for a few lucky events, and almost exclusively in primetime.

(4) Primetime is MY time. Unfortunately, most Americans don't get 2 weeks paid vacation to sit at home and watch the Olympics, and most employers generally frown upon sitting at your desk and live-streaming the whole thing. So, by and large, we come home and watch your primetime broadcast, hence the unbelievable ratings. Even though primetime is but a few short hours, I'd really like to get a sense of everything that happened at the Olympics that day. I'd like to feel like I could simultaneously be in 6 places at once, and get at least a brief overview of all the sports, from the hot ticket to the what-the-heck-is-that.

This means that you have to get much better at managing your time. No dilly-dallying. Less Ryan Seacrest. No 30 minute to hour-long documentaries at the beginning of your primetime broadcast, no matter how genuinely moving and compelling. Broadcast those earlier, or later, or on a different channel, or on-demand.

Be very judicious about showing prelims. Frankly, as great as the track and field and diving events are (and they are great), do we really need to see the same divers and runners doing prelims, semis, and finals? Unless you plan on showing us additional athletes during those earlier rounds, or unless something very unexpected happened, why not skip those, or at least shorten them into a fast-paced highlights reel. Especially during qualifying heats, don't show runners or swimmers hanging out by the starting line for 3 minutes. Edit those clips much, much more tightly, so we get about 15-30 seconds for you to introduce the event, and then show the event. Since most of the events go by so quickly anyway, you're going to replay them several times in slo-mo, during which time you'll go into much more detailed analysis, so we really don't need to watch athletes pacing and stretching for 3 minutes before each heat.

With the time you save, introduce us to a few more sports that you otherwise would have left out of primetime. I understand that some sports are more popular than others, but, to be honest, I feel like part of the reason for that is that you frame them that way for us. If you showed us a greater variety of events in primetime, you might find that we're interested in a greater variety of sports, and I highly doubt that your ratings will suffer for it. You already chopped up Misty and Kerri's volleyball matches, and cut dozens of nameless, faceless divers out of the diving competitions, so why not edit that stuff even a little tighter, and sneak in some wrestling, and judo, and kayaking, and fencing, and handball, and cycling, and soccer, and basketball, and stuff involving horses, or boats, or weapons, or heavy objects, and other events into primetime? Even if you just give us a 30 minute "Around the Games" feature each night, with brief highlights from the more obscure events, you could still devote the overwhelming bulk of your primetime coverage to a few high-profile sports, but leave viewers feeling like they've gotten a more complete picture of the day at the Olympics.

Yes, it's inevitable that Americans are going to want you to focus your coverage on American athletes -- especially American athletes who win medals -- but this doesn't necessarily force you to exclude losing athletes, or athletes from other countries -- as, to your credit, you sometimes did in primetime. If there's a really fantastic match between two non-US opponents or a really breathtaking performance by a little-known athlete in a poorly-understood sport from a tiny little country, find the time to show us at least a few minutes of it in primetime. Let us root for phenomenal achievement, even if it's not by an American, and especially if it's by someone not already known to the whole world.

(5) Which brings me to another related point: Profiles, features, and lead-ins. The Olympic games are filled with incredible people doing incredible things, often overcoming incredible odds to get there. It makes for a beautiful, tear-jerker narrative, and the producers at NBC do a pretty phenomenal job tugging at those heartstrings with moving athlete profiles at the beginning of many primetime events.

Keep doing these profiles. I do want to learn about the athletes, their struggles, and their triumphs. Since most Olympic athletes are nowhere near being household names, and their sports are equally obscure, without these profiles it would otherwise feel like I'm watching a bunch of strangers play an odd sport with confusing rules.

But, don't patronize me. Tell me the truth, even when the story isn't quite as fairy-tale. And, more importantly, don't let the profiles 'give away the endings.' Almost as a rule, NBC only showed profiles of athletes who went on to win an event minutes later. Show me profiles of losers. Show me profiles of people from other countries, even when they're not the fastest person in the world. Don't make this us-against-them. If you're going to humanize the 'good guys' (aka the Americans), I want to see profiles of America's fiercest competitors (aka the 'bad guys') as well.

(6) And let athletes catch their breath before you interview them. Yeah, it's cool to run them down for instant feedback on the pool deck or the race track or the field, even before they've had the chance to hug their coaches or take a shower. This is pretty neat on a live broadcast. But if you're tape-delaying it anyway, you might as well give them a few minutes to compose themselves, sit them down in a studio, and ask them some more compelling questions.

---

Like I said, this list is not exhaustive (in fact, as I think of things, I reserve the right to add them later). And, I understand that resources are limited, broadcast rights, tape delays, and quick editing are complicated, and Americans like our fluffy reality TV as much as anyone else.

But I know you can do better next time, and I'm sure you agree.

So, get cracking! I'll be rooting for NBC to pick itself up, dust itself off, and do much better at the next Olympics!

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  And show some medal ceremonies with non-US (8+ / 0-)

    winners and participants.  And if the US wins a Silver or Bronze, show those medal ceremonies as well.

    "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." --M. L. King "You can't fix stupid" --Ron White -6.00, -5.18

    by zenbassoon on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 09:03:45 AM PDT

  •  Good thoughts but (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    cohenzee, Brooke In Seattle
    I'll be rooting for NBC to pick itself up, dust itself off, and do much better at the next Olympics!
    Not going to happen because this abysmal arrogant effort from NBC did not occur in a vacuum. It is symptomatic of just how little regard the Village media has for those it serves. Until it stops seeing us as children who have to have everything explained, packaged and predigested nothing is going to change.

    Also all of the errors made at these games are exactly the same as the ones made 4 years ago.

  •  The Opening Ceremony Had The Highest Rating..... (4+ / 0-)

    of any Olympics in history....40.5 MILLION Americans watched, 1 BILLION worldwide.  The first 14 days was watched by 210.5 MILLION people.....second only to Beijing w/ 215 MILLION people.

    NBC probably isn't going to change their format.  Their research showed people will still watch even if they've heard the results.  

    Even though they got over $1 BILLION in ad money, NBC may not break even.  But they got the ratings.....that's what counts in TV land.

  •  last night was the final straw (6+ / 0-)

    we stayed home to watch the closing ceremony and were totally annoyed with the banal banter which sometimes drowned out the great concert going on BUT we were SOOOOOOOOO ANGRY when NBC cut away to some dumb sit com right at the moment the WHO were supposed to be doing the finale...   I had thought, ok a 5 minute plug for their new show but nooooooooo  this was an entire 1/2 hour episode (WTF) followed by the local NEWS and then a slew of commercials before going back to the finale... which turned out to be exactly 6 minutes long!!!!

    I never felt so HAD like I did when that happened... NBS could have aired those 6 minutes BEFORE that sitcom preview and the local news BUT they decided that it was more advantageous for them to tease the who while holding their audience captive...  and that is how I viewed the entire of the NBC olympic coverage this year.   It seemed more like a BIG AD FOR NBC then coverage of the international games.

    "You've got to be an optimist to be a Democrat, and a humorist to stay one" - Will Rogers

    by KnotIookin on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 09:13:03 AM PDT

    •  yep, last night was stupid (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Brooke In Seattle

      we mute the commercials and when the break just kept going and we realized that we were being subjected to a "preview" of some new idiotic show instead of getting to see the end of the ceremonies, we said screw it, turned off the TV and went to bed.

    •  Since there was a five hour time difference, (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Brooke In Seattle

      I knew the closing ceremonies would be on live somewhere on line. I was able to watch most of it; however, I was angered to hear that Ray Davies's performance of "Waterloo Sunset" was cut from the NBC broadcast. WTF?

      I have nothing against the Spice Girls (in fact, I have their music on my iPod), but they get more play than a rock legend like Ray Davies?

      And they cut a portion of The Who's performance?

      "Do they call you Rush because you're in a rush to eat?" -"Stutterin' John" Melendez to Rush Limbaugh.

      by Nedsdag on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 11:15:39 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Also, Muse. (0+ / 0-)

        My daughter has been waiting for three weeks to see Muse in the closing ceremonies.

        I guess even though one of the band members is married to an American actress (Kate Hudson), they still couldn't manage to let the guys play ONE. DAMN. SONG. on American TV. I guess they are "too British" or something. Despite all the British-isms on display during the entire Olympics -- and that Muse only wrote the OFFICIAL LONDON 2012 OLYMPICS SONG!

        Daughter is still fuming.

        "The difference between the right word and the almost-right word is like the difference between lightning and the lightning bug." -- Mark Twain

        by Brooke In Seattle on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 12:29:52 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  I'm still getting over my guys, Arctic Monkeys (0+ / 0-)

          getting the half-shaft from the opening ceremonies with Bob Costas deciding to have a conversation midway through their set.

          Off topic: Muse's lead singer Matt Bellamy and Kate Hudson aren't married yet, but they might as well be. They have a kid together.

          "Do they call you Rush because you're in a rush to eat?" -"Stutterin' John" Melendez to Rush Limbaugh.

          by Nedsdag on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 12:36:07 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  Ending ceremonies botched too. How is it possible? (6+ / 0-)

    Let's see... first, on a tape delay, we'll begin broadcasting the ceremonies earlier than the listed time. No biggie.

    Then of course, we can't show the ceremonies in their ENTIRETY - what do you think we are, a professional broadcasting channel? We NEEDED to cut into the broadcast so we could show the pilot of their latest extremely lame sitcom (at 11:00 PM, prime time viewing - that's how much we believe in it!) so you could see it before it's canceled by episode 6 because nobody's watching it! THEN we aired the last part of the ceremonies at... oh... 12:30 or 1:00 AM on a Sunday night, because we know you'll all still be up watching. It's not like you have anything to do on a Monday morning, right?

    Is the Rmoney campaign running NBC now, too?

    (romney)/RYAN 2012 - Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? Caught in a landslide....no escape from reality...

    by Fordmandalay on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 09:13:51 AM PDT

  •  NBC should hire you to run the coverage next time (4+ / 0-)

    You're clearly a lot savvier than the putzes in charge this time.

  •  Here's a suggestion of my own (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    wu ming, BachFan, Nedsdag

    1. Dig a large hole.
    2. Politely invite Bob Costas to stand in it.
    3. Fill with sand.
    4. Add honey and  fire ants.
    5. Air the hilarity live in primetime.

  •  NBC will never get the Summer Olympics right (0+ / 0-)

    It seems the more channels they have, the worse the broadcast gets.  It was the same 4 and 8 years ago, but now they had the ability to screw up the internet and app broadcasts as well.  They seem to do a decent job with the Winter Olympics.  Maybe because, as you say, there are less sports to cover so they can highlight more athletes and countries.  Plus, they can utilize their many channels more effectively.  

    NBC has been a disaster as a broadcaster/entertainment company in recent years.  The two things I can give them credit for are their hockey broadcasts, which while not perfect, have become very entertaining and informative especially on NBC Sports Network channel, and MSNBC which has been steadily getting better over the last few years.  I hope they continue adding to their weekend line-up because the start has been very promising.

    I hope someone comes along and fixes it, but as long as Ebersol is around, I doubt much will change.

  •  next summer olympics, i will plan to be in WA (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Brooke In Seattle

    visiting the in-laws, so i can just watch the canadian broadcast service do their characteristically capable and decent job. so fucking sick of NBC's whole shtick.

  •  I agree on pretty much everything (0+ / 0-)

    I was fortunate enough to be able to stream most of what I wanted to watch, some of which NBC really should have included in some sort of highlights. Why in the world wasn't part of the first-ever American Gold in Judo shown? Or the amazing medal ceremony for the female Irish boxer? Or any of the weightlifting competitions?

    Hell, even the Women's Soccer win only got like 2 minutes. Pathetic.

    "The Internet Never Forgets, and Republicans Never Learn." - blue aardvark

    by SC Lib on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 10:16:11 AM PDT

  •  The Winter Olympics fall during February, (0+ / 0-)

    which is "sweeps month" for the four major networks who are counting on high ratings. If you think what you saw during the summer was condensed and horrid, wait until February 2014.

    Come to think of it, I didn't see a lot of cross-country skiing because Americans usually do not do well; however, there was one XC event where Americans medaled, but even that was muted.

    That time difference is as much of a killer as the past London Olympics.

    "Do they call you Rush because you're in a rush to eat?" -"Stutterin' John" Melendez to Rush Limbaugh.

    by Nedsdag on Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 11:11:50 AM PDT

    •  Winter Olympics (0+ / 0-)

      Sochi, being a few time zones farther east, the time difference is going to be even MORE of an issue (exacerbated by the fact that many winter sports must take place outside, during daylight hours in Sochi). NBC is going to have to figure out better ways to keep spoilers to a minimum (for those who wait until primetime), without belittling viewers and pretending like the much-delayed events are happening live, and without denying good access options for those who don't want to wait.

      Personally, I'm a winter sports person, and I've always found the Winter Olympics primetime coverage to be worse than Summer primetime coverage -- with short shrift given even to high prestige but time-consuming events like alpine races -- but I generally attribute that to the fact that it's a smaller Games, with less US interest, so the network assumes that Americans don't have the desire or patience to watch even a few untruncated 90 second individual ski runs from start to finish (this may or may not be a correct assumption).

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site