Skip to main content

The Republicans' long-term 'fiscal' playbook is so predictable.  It's always the same, whether at the Federal, State or corporate level.  Whatever the market is doing, they always choose to spin the numbers so that - in the long run - they can cut back on pension and medical benefits for workers and savers.  And then they kick back the surplus to the 1%, their friends and contributors.

Romney and Ryan are playing the same game. They want to finish the job started by President Bush.  They want to destroy social security and medicare - the pensions and benefits of most American workers.

Phase 1- Sell High
The Republicans are clever.  When the market is high they don't try and reduce pension benefits directly.  Instead they reduce the contributions.  They sleazily hint that the market will stay high  forever.   They feed "stories" like that to idiot business journalists.  They talk about "new economics", "business models", "paradigm shifts", etc.  

And then they put out stories saying that pension funds are "over-funded".  And then they get the legislatures to lower actuarial standards and so they cut pension contributions.  What do they do with the diverted 'excess' contributions? They reduce taxes, mostly for the wealthiest. They don't do anything productive or progressive like, say, reducing class size in inner cities or reducing sales taxes.

Then a few years go by.  And they wait.  Like hyenas, crouching in the shadows.

Phase 2 - Buy Low
Then when the market reverses and goes low - they exclaim "surprise" and "shock" at finding the pension funds have deficits. They dissemble, blaming "bureaucrats" and "waste".  They warn of the dangers of losing "competitiveness". They attack with un-representative stories, citing single cases of double-dippers, and then insinuate that fraud and abuse are rampant. (They never mention that a decade before they led the fight to lower contributions).

And then - they solemnly clear their throats and they say 'we have a serious problem'. They say '"we" can't afford to meet our obligations'.  And they say we need 'reform'.  But what they are really doing is breaking their promises. And then they legislate reductions to pension and medical benefits.  

They break promises, and call it reform.

And they knew all along they would do this.

See how it works?

Sell high.  Wait ten years or so. Then buy low.  Just another manufactured crisis, and the Republicans and their friends get commissions and tax breaks from churning our pensions.

That's what the Republicans have done at the state level.

That's what Romney and Bain did to the workers of the companies they bought. (It usually doesn't take ten years in the private sector since as managers they can add debt as soon as they takeover).

And that's what the Bush/Romney/Ryan plan is for Social Security and Medicare.  They say Social Security and Medicare are in a crisis - but who manufactured the 'crisis'?  The Republicans did.

Many states are now facing pension deficits.  One econo-blogger has placed a summary in this handy interactive map of state pension deficits. (Note that the map is actually from the conservative 'think' tank American Enterprise Institute.  The fact they spent so much time on it shows you how interested they are in selling the crisis right now.)

But state pension plans weren't underfunded 10 years ago.  It took deliberate malfeasance to do this.

New Jersey is one example - in the late 1990s Republican Governor Christine Todd Whitman executed the "sell high" phase of the con perfectly. This article shows how she declared a surplus at the high of the market and reduced contributions in the name of "competitiveness".

And now, his combativeness, Governor Chris Christie, has played the "buy low" card. He expressed surprise at the pension deficit and has succeeded in reducing future obligations to New Jersey's workers.  Here's the article detailing his "reforms"

Generally the media just plays along, not reporting the long term perspective. They just echo the Republican talking points -  they 'report' that  'reforms' are 'necessary', like in this weaselly op-ed from US News  They say the "crisis" requires cut-backs.  The papers proclaim Christie as a "leader".

But he is just a bag-man.  He's just collecting the IOU Christine Whitman wrote to the 1% ten years ago.

Is just another manufactured crisis.  (I don't mean to pick on New Jersey. I don't even live there.  But I can see it from my front lawn.)

These crises are manufactured by Republicans over a decade.  Its a win-win (for them) market timing strategy.  They cut contributions when the market is strong; then they cut benefits when the market is weak.  Net result -workers are screwed, the 1% get huge tax breaks.
=

And as Mitt Romney's record (what we can see of it, anyway)at Bain shows the Republican plan is the same when they take over businesses. Declare the pensions over-funded and so cash out the 'surplus'. Pay yourself a fee and give the rest of the surplus to investors. Then load the company with debt.  Pay yourself a "management fee" for each transaction.  If necessary let the Federal Government try and bail out the the pension fund.  Keep the profits for yourself and your friends.

Here's a Reuter's story on Bain's takeover of GS Technologies and its subsequent default on pensions, and bank debt, and everything it owed everybody, except, of course, the fees Bain had already collected.  

Bottom line - Bain made money; workers were ripped off.

Another manufactured crisis.  More money for the 1%.  And more broken promises for the rest of us.

=
And so now Romney and Ryan say they want to save Medicare and Social Security! But they lie.  They are just trying to execute the buy low half of the Republican con.  The Republicans manufactured this crisis.

The first half was selling high.  That's what Bush did.  In 2001 the Republicans and President G.W. Bush inherited a Federal surplus from President Clinton.   Bush's reckless policies squandered the surplus.  This NY Times graph shows how the Republicans under Bush gave out too many tax cuts based on too rosy an assessment of the economy's long term prospects.  And then wasted trillions on wars we didn't need.

And so now they try and blame President Obama for the deficit. They have set him up, and they have set us up.  Will Americans fall for this Republican con-game?

Ryan and Romney say they will "save Medicare".  But read the fine print of the Ryan con.  Medicare will remain if you are over 55.  

But if you are under 55 you will just get some f*cking vouchers.  Please. Those vouchers will be so worthless.  They will probably just stick them in the Sunday papers, next to Parade magazine.

And they say they will privatize social security - another con.  Bush wanted to privatize social security in 2007.  Can you imagine what would have happened if he'd succeeded?  Half the money would have been lost by the end of 2008!
==

So we are now at the low end of the decade-long election-economic cycle. With the Ryan plan, the Republicans are playing the "buy low" card. The Republicans say we can't fix the deficit by raising taxes on the job creators.  Baloney.  They say the deficit can't be fixed without destroying Medicare and Social Security (they call it "saving").  Baloney.  

They are conning the Republic.  They have stolen pension funds from state workers, and from the workers of the companies they 'manage'.

Now they want to steal social security and medicare.

They say they are Republican conservatives.  Baloney.

They manufactured this crisis; and for the last four years they have deliberately sabotaged the economy.  They just want to put their bag man in the White House and play the buy-low card and complete the theft of social security and medicare.

They are Republic- cons.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Same thing in Illinois. n/t (0+ / 0-)

    Float like a manhole cover, sting like a sash weight! Clean Coal Is A Clinker!

    by JeffW on Tue Aug 14, 2012 at 09:10:03 AM PDT

  •  Well framed (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    phonegery, ToKnowWhy

    Hope this gets picked up and spread.

    Ryan Plan = Bain Plan = Steal pensions = Steal Medicare and Social security.
    Rinse and repeat.
  •  With luck, someone will chart the highs, and lows (0+ / 0-)

    for us.  Now what is the best way to make this accepted common knowledge.

    Democrats - We represent America!

    by phonegery on Tue Aug 14, 2012 at 10:09:48 AM PDT

  •  I would love (0+ / 0-)

    for my retirement plan directors at CalPERS to say "we would like to see all of our money...now."

    And the same for every other plan out there.

    Once a year gather it up and show their membership visible solvency.

    I think getting together to talk about assets regularly is not quite the same.

    I wonder how many plans are covering up massive losses, beyond those we already know?

    Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Kurt Vonnegut Economic Left/Right: -7.50 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

    by ToKnowWhy on Tue Aug 14, 2012 at 12:41:02 PM PDT

  •  Whether planned or just dumb profit sniffing (0+ / 0-)

    it works the same way... short cut to grab money... I do think that plenty at the top are quite aware of the long game... it is almost totally predictable... the wealthiest ride the peaks and troughs of boom and bust with fore knowledge and even some control of the frequency and amplitude of the cycles... and game it all by playing whatever side of the market changes is ripe for the most value extraction.

    BUT the whole economic quail ranch, shooting fish in a barrel con was really hampered by FDR and the new deal... In a way the take the money and run crowd just got too numerous and spoiled the rigged Casino game the very rich were running... took it to the natural extreme that the market rigging already embodied to the implosion point. While the smartest already were cashed out and the latecomers to the pyramid were left holding the bag... the big problem was that far too many were "playing" and the collapse dragged most of the country down.

    But really rich do play a long game and this time around they had to whittle and gnaw away at the New Deal protections and restrictions. And it was easy. There were rewards for each new bubble and convenient self serving lies about what was to blame when things went wrong. So those who just get pointed in the direction of quick money are part of the push for longer term dismantling of the restraints on full scale Oligarchical confiscation and liquidation of most of everyone's net worth, potential earnings, pensions etc.

    There are impediments in the direct path of the Jr. looters and they just see them as evil and do not see the longer bigger picture at all. They have an economic belief set that explains things simply and they focus on their rightful maximal looting and removing whatever supposedly hampers them. The Think tank mantras and buzz concepts fuel their outrage at being slightly hampered in there quest and the efforts of this myopic middle echelon of looters help the long game super rich get closer to the promised land... but as always the con is pretty much to suck blood for as long as possible without the host really noticing what is going on... and the enabler vampires don't fully understand it either... they believe the notions that what they are doing is GOOD for the host... those who know better do not care and just wait... and the rabble of the looting class either end up richer or get squashed by their brethren or the lords of the 1%... and naturally blame it on poor people or the government...

    Some processes do not require Illuminati or some other imaginary CT group of Billionaires manipulating everything. Greed is all that is needed at each step in a cycle to destroy the next impediment to maximum profit which sets up the next step. The smarter ones just know how to be ready and see the rises and falls coming... and they are like surfers... and get carried along better than others.. but unlike surfers they can manipulate when the wave crests and how and when it breaks... and be ready... while having better surfboards... And like a kid in a bathtub or a swimming pool make the peaks and crests more extreme for their own benefit.

    Mitt Romney is one of the lesser, dimmer looters who buys into "Creative destruction" as a positive thing (because it works so well for him) These knowing and unknowing profiteers are the opposite of those who try to dampen down extremes since the extremes are what destroy lives and livelihoods.... and keep the economy healthy and on an even keel... too boring for billionaires.

    Pogo & Murphy's Law, every time. Also "Trust but verify" - St. Ronnie (hah...)

    by IreGyre on Fri Aug 17, 2012 at 08:50:41 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site