Skip to main content

My senator, John McCain, is making news lately for defending Mitt Romney's tax returns -- while assisting in the conspiracy to hide them from the American people, of course. But that is not the only issue that causes him to vent his bitterness and yell at clouds. He's also been complaining about the fiscal cliff, spooking folks who work in Arizona for defense contractors. What he doesn't tell them is that he voted for it; his vote for the Budget Control Act helped make it happen.

My friends and I can quote a fair bit of Aliens (from 1986? cripes, I'm old), but one of my favorites is from Burke, the corporate slimeball, remarking on their remarkable, automated atmosphere processor: We manufacture those, by the way. Since I know some folks who work for defense contractors around here, it was sort of a running if uneasy joke to mention it when the nightly news included footage of the Iraq war, say. But none of my friends were directly responsible for dropping ordnance on people. Not directly, I suppose.

Anyway, bitter old loser John McCain has joined the Republican campaign of terror regarding the 'fiscal cliff,' of course concentrating almost entirely on the defense-hawk side of the equation and visiting weapons manufacturers and such. It made it to the local paper today.

McCain, citing statistics from a recent George Mason University report, said the impact of defense-spending sequestration on Arizona would include more than 35,000 layoffs and a $3 billion loss to Arizona's gross state product.
He went on to register a complaint about the President "not trying harder" to negotiate a compromise. Never mind that Congress is not in session now, and won't be for any significant amount of time between now and November -- it's election season.
"We can undo it, but it's going to take people working together under the leadership of the president," McCain said. "He should be calling us together to work on a compromise."
Sure, and who would listen right now. Anyone? McCain's busy drumming up fearful votes for Republicans, along with plenty of other representatives and senators, I'm sure.

Meanwhile, during an interview with McCain on Fox (of course), why would anyone mention the unfortunate fact that he voted for the Budget Control Act? Surprisingly, someone did.

But McCain said it was time to move past fighting about last year’s vote, and chided the president for not sitting down with Republicans to hammer out a deal on the cuts.

“I plead guilty. It was a bad thing to do, OK?” McCain said in an interview Tuesday evening with Fox News’s Greta Van Susteren. “We did a stupid thing when we said if the select committee failed then there would be automatic across-the-board cuts.”

John McCain angry face
Of course you'd like to move past the part where it's your own damn fault and get on with the much more important business of blaming the President, eh? Sorry, no sale. Yes, this is the debt ceiling and budget deal that McCain voted for, that he took pains to praise the Republican leadership in Congress for negotiating without violating their "core principles," that he praised for it not raising any taxes. I went back and found the statement McCain gave on the bill's passage.

He claimed that defense spending did not cause their little fiscal dilemma. Yet we know that the unfunded wars in Iraq and Afghanistan during the Bush regime contributed $1.4 trillion to the debt; where would we be if those misadventures had gone differently? Not to mention the several trillion dollars lost to the Bush tax cuts, the ones that they wanted because we were running a surplus at the time. Republicans sure fixed that problem, didn't they.

And last year, McCain also whined about the arbitrary nature of the sequestration...well, a rather one-sided whine.

But what concerns me most about our current debate is not just the enormous size of the potential reductions, but that the defense cuts being discussed have little to no strategic or military rationale to support them.  They are essentially just numbers on a page.  Our national defense planning and spending must be driven by considered strategy, not arbitrary arithmetic.  
I imagine this would be nice in all areas of fiscal policy, considering the years of continuing resolutions, budget freezes, arbitrary across-the-board percentage cuts and such.

McCain gave many other reasons to support the Budget Control Act, a vote that he now finds foolish. He mentioned the possibility of the nation's credit rating being downgraded -- and in spite of the vote, it was downgraded anyway. He mentioned the unemployment rate, and warned that it would continue to go up -- and he was wrong about that one, too, still down almost a full point since then. He claimed that we can't tax and spend out of it, neglecting of course the example of the Clinton-era tax rates and the prosperity the nation enjoyed at the time.

Remember who was President during the last budget surplus, and who fixed that right up? Hope so. Talk about a road we've taken before, a cliff we nearly plunged off of; by rights the concept of cutting taxes to improve the lot of our people was tested during Dubya's reign, tried and failed. Clear majorities have been demonstrated in favor of making the rich and corporations pay their fair share, which they clearly are not doing now.

So while you're off scaring defense contractors, Senator, be sure to remind them that when it comes to crises like this 'fiscal cliff,' We manufacture those, by the way.

Originally posted to The Tytalan Way on Wed Aug 15, 2012 at 10:53 AM PDT.

Also republished by Baja Arizona Kossacks and Community Spotlight.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site