Skip to main content

Cross-Posted at America's Voice:

Today, the first of nearly 1.7 million DREAMers can begin applying for deferred action under a program that was announced by President Obama earlier this year in June. (See the Washington Post article here.)

The political impact of this is clear. Over the next month, hundreds of thousands of DREAMers will be seen on  TV, lining up to submit their paperwork and talking about how their lives will change.  For Spanish language media, this will be top news.

Big events are also happening around the country. Last night, DREAMers were standing in queue over night in Chicago to receive help filling out their applications. For more background on these events, visit the United We DREAM website.

Though today is HUGE, Romney won't even talk about the new program. In January, he vowed to veto the DREAM Act and later, advocated "self deportation." But today? Nada.  

Romney also knows that Latino voters could tip the balance in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, New Mexico, Nevada, and Virginia. And just today, Politico ran the latest numbers in an article on how Paul Ryan, who voted NO on DREAM and voted YES on the infamous Sensenbrenner bill (which sparked the massive marches of 2006), doesn't help with Hispanics:

    Obama’s lead over Romney among Hispanic voters in national polling hovers around and even above the 40 percent mark. Last month, a Latino Decisions survey showed Obama touching 70 percent of the vote and leading by 48 points. An NBC/Wall Street Journal/Telemundo poll conducted in late July found Obama taking 67 percent of Latinos to Romney’s 23 percent. The POLITICO/George Washington University Battleground Poll published Monday placed that lead at 62 percent to 26 percent.

    Univision anchor Jorge Ramos framed the Republican dilemma in a tweet after the Ryan announcement: “How can [Paul Ryan] attract the Hispanic vote? If Republicans don’t get a third of the Latino vote they won’t get the White House back.”

Romney is just about at the point of no return with Latino vote. Yesterday, America's Voice challenged Romney to state his position on what's happening today:

    With the DREAMer “Deferred Action” process set to begin tomorrow at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Mitt Romney still refuses to answer a simple question: on his first day as President, would he keep or revoke this new policy?

    After taking hardline anti-immigrant activists as advisors, and hardline immigration positions during the primary, Romney has stuck to the hard right on immigration for the general election—despite the fact that this is hurting him significantly with Latino voters, who are the key to winning a number of battleground states.  Romney pledged to veto the DREAM Act and labeled it a “handout,” called Arizona a “model” for the nation when it comes to immigration laws, and advocated the Kris Kobach-Lamar Smith plan of “self-deportation” as an alternative to citizenship for certain immigrants without papers.

We also asked GOP Senate candidates in Arizona, Florida, Massachusetts, New Mexico, Nevada, Texas and Virginia whether they support or oppose the Right to DREAM? We posed a simple question to Congressman Jeff Flake, Connie Mack, Senator Scott Brown, Heather Wilson, Ted Cruz and George Allen:

    If elected, would you call on Mitt Romney to keep or cancel President Obama’s DREAMer documentation program?

It would be a smart political move for Romney and the GOP Senate candidates to support the DREAMers, but the anti-immigrant nativists still control their party. We're not expecting to hear an answer, and Latino voters in all of the key states will know who stood with DREAMers and who didn't.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Then What? (0+ / 0-)

    It would be a smart political move for Romney and the GOP Senate candidates to support the DREAMers, but the anti-immigrant nativists still control their party

    What do you do with the parents? Are you trying to convince anybody that this is going to end with the 'DREAMERS'? Are you trying to convince anyone that you are not going to support the deportation of somebody who was not 31 before June 2012 but you are going to support their deportation if they were 31 after June 2012?

    First it was 800,000, now it's 1.7 million. What is it going to be tomorrow and again, are you going to try and convince anyone that tomorrow it isn't going to be "how can we grant the children legal status and deport the parents?".

    The goal here is to end deportation of illegal immigrants altogether. As Luis Gutierrez’ puts it a 'rolling amnesty'. A defacto end to immigration law in the U.S.

    Between the exporting of jobs to cheaper labor and the importing of cheaper labor to jobs the two political parties have basically destroyed the middle class.

    What's left now is merely the pandering to the various constituencies in order to remain in power just a little while longer.

    I won't be coming home tonight, my generation will put it right - Genesis 9:3

    by superscalar on Wed Aug 15, 2012 at 12:47:36 PM PDT

  •  I Keep Asking (0+ / 0-)

    In January, he vowed to veto the DREAM Act and later, advocated "self deportation."

    What is the difference between 'self deportation' and what the Democratic Party keeps saying it supports i.e. 'go after the employers'? If I make it practically impossible for an illegal immigrant to get a job, what is the difference between that and just deporting that illegal immigrant to begin with?

    There is no difference between 'self deportation' and 'go after the employers'. And this is why the Democratic Party doesn't actually ever 'go after the employers' to begin with.

    I won't be coming home tonight, my generation will put it right - Genesis 9:3

    by superscalar on Wed Aug 15, 2012 at 12:56:55 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site