Skip to main content

This week, the Sierra Club presented a new report to the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) board of directors that charts a course for TVA to a clean energy future. The report, prepared by Synapse Energy Economics and commissioned by the Sierra Club, reveals that TVA can lower ratepayer bills every month for decades and clean up the air across the eastern US by investing in energy efficiency, rather than in retrofits for their most polluting coal plants.

I grew up in the Tennessee Valley, and I know that this will come as welcome news to the millions of residents in TVA's 7-state service area. TVA is the nation's largest producer of electric power, and for decades, much of that power came from an aging fleet of coal-fired power plants.

In 2011, the Sierra Club, along with several states and allied organizations, reached a settlement with TVA to retire 18 of their aging coal units -- an agreement that was heralded as a historic victory for clean air. Now, TVA faces a decision about whether to spend billions to retrofit some of their remaining aging coal plants, or to instead invest in clean energy and energy efficiency.

This week, we are issuing a simple challenge to TVA's board of directors: live up to your agency's founding commitment, dating back to the New Deal, to improve the lives of everyone TVA serves by investing in energy efficiency.

Incredibly, the new report found that, based on TVA's own studies, if TVA commits to energy savings of just 1.2 percent annually through energy efficiency, it could replace at least one of its non-economic coal plants in just three years' time. These savings would translate into lower electricity bills and fewer coal-related illnesses for people throughout the Tennessee Valley region.

Further, if TVA pushes its energy savings up to 2 percent annually -- rates that are achieved by other leading national utilities -- by 2015, it could generate enough reductions to retire even more non-economic units, such as all the coal boilers at its highly polluting Gallatin and Colbert plants.

On the other hand, the capital cost of putting pollution controls on the TVA coal fleet would likely start at $11.8 billion, not counting additional costs associated with controlling climate-disrupting carbon pollution. After the retrofits, TVA plants would cost more to operate than the price of power on the open market, creating an unnecessary cost burden to consumers.

The bottom line is simple: replacing dirty coal with energy efficiency makes sound economic sense and saves lives. Energy efficiency means cleaner air, lower electric bills, and healthier communities. In Tennessee alone, TVA's coal fleet was likely responsible for more than 499 premature deaths in 2010.

But there is hope. TVA's board has committed to a renewed vision for TVA's future, in which the utility invests in energy efficiency and clean energy. It is now up to TVA to decide whether that vision will become a reality.

One of our volunteers and a TVA ratepayer, Louise Gorenflo, put it this way: "TVA has an opportunity to prioritize energy efficiency which will boost our local economy while saving customers money and, critically, reduce the use of coal fired power. This is a win-win for our pocketbooks and for our health."

TVA should pursue a path under which it retires as many of its non-economic coal plants as possible, while ramping up investments in energy efficiency and clean energy. TVA was created to brighten hopes for everyone it serves. Now it can. Will it live up to the challenge?

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site