Skip to main content

All of official Washington is scratching a collective head about why Mitt Romney chose Paul Ryan as his running mate. Conventional wisdom is that any day Romney is not talking about the economy, he is losing. And since the Ryan pick, all we’ve talked about is Medicare.

Politico reports that leading Republicans are panicked that Ryan will hurt the down ballot races and help Democrats keep the Senate. One week later, Democrats remain absolutely giddy about the choice.

Paul Ryan is best known for proposing legislative remedies to the problem of government providing actual services to actual citizens. He is fully and firmly against any government program that makes working life more healthy, secure, or comfortable. He opposes government making it more possible for workers to retire. He is against Medicare, as we all know, but he also sponsored a (failed) bill to eliminate Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. The latter helps states provide health care for the children of the working poor.

Pundits generally consider Ryan unelectable to statewide office in Wisconsin and unelectable to any national office on his own. His legislative record after six terms is unsuccessful. In 13 years, only two of his bills have become law, one naming a post office after Les Aspin and one providing a tax break for the makers of arrowheads.

Romney already had a huge Electoral College problem, particularly in the swing states that will decide the election, including Florida. Real Clear Politics (our favorite poll aggregator) estimates that Obama wins the likely electoral vote count 237 to Romney’s 191. 270 electoral votes are needed to win the election, meaning Obama only needs Florida (29) and any other toss up state to win.

After RCP parses the toss-up states, President Obama is reelected 332 to 206, a rout that includes Florida, Colorado, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia and even Ryan’s home state of Wisconsin. Of swing states, only North Carolina goes to Romney. (Republican Steve Forbes owns the controlling interest in RCP; you can’t simply dismiss them.)

Validating the conventional wisdom is the lackluster poll bump that Romney got from the pick. Usually, a candidate gets a bounce after picking a running mate (like McCain with Palin.) Yet for Romney, you can hear crickets. Still, picking Ryan does seem to have stopped Romney’s slide. Two recent polls show him slightly ahead. Last week, Obama’s lead was expanding pretty rapidly. (Remember this.)

Clearly, the obvious choice would be anyone else, particularly someone who might help with Florida or with Hispanic voters – or at least not hurt with them. Marco Rubio would have offered the same bomb-thrower aesthetic without the Medicare millstone. Rob Portman would have done no harm.

Was it a supreme act of bravery to pick Ryan? That’s hard to imagine given that it’s Romney doing the picking. There are three more likely explanations:

  1. He share’s Ryan’s views about the rich and the rest of us. In the Randian Objectivist viewpoint that Ryan adores, people are divided into two groups, creators and leeches. It is sinful, in the Objectivist worldview, to be generous.
    This is a viewpoint that fits very well with another belief we’ve noticed among children of privilege (which both these men are.) Many children from well-off families believe they have earned their place in the upper echelons even though there is no objective (sorry) proof that they did. It may well be that both these men share the bonds of privilege and the mutual philosophy that they are entitled to their superiority. They are like-minded thinkers who “click” with each other.
  2. It’s a Hail Mary Pass. Campaigns see the same polling data that we do. But they see it sooner and in more detail. It is very likely that Romney came to realize that he had little chance of winning without a shakeup. “Game changer” is the campaign messaging for the Ryan pick. It is also what McCain’s ill-fated pick of Palin was called.
    So it’s simply possible that Romney, facing the strong possibility of losing, decided to throw long. Ryan is his attempt to change the dynamic without the Sarah Palin backfire. Palin energized a flagging McCain campaign but ultimately cost McCain the election. Too many people thought (correctly) that she was unqualified.
  3. Romney is giving himself an excuse for losing. Don’t rule out the possibility that Romney chose Ryan exactly because he represents the Palin pick. Romney has displayed a fair amount of narcissism so far, notably he doesn’t believe he needs to be specific about what he would do. (He’s a businessman after all.) He has also been particularly arrogant about his tax avoidance strategies. He thinks they are none of your business.
    One of the characteristics of narcissism is the inability to accept blame. Seeing an increasing likelihood of failure, the narcissist will begin looking around for someone to blame. Ryan provides a convenient explanation, just as Palin did for John McCain.

John McCain emerged largely undiminished from his loss. He is still considered an elder statesman. Palin can’t get an invite to the convention (and reportedly cried about it.) These days, she comes off looking like Eva Peron. Who would Mitt Romney rather be?

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Randian ? (2+ / 0-)

         Did you say Randian ?

         

    The GOP ... Government of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%

    by Azazello on Thu Aug 16, 2012 at 04:42:55 PM PDT

  •  4. Mitt wuvs Paulie. (0+ / 0-)

    Still enjoying my stimulus package.

    by Kevvboy on Thu Aug 16, 2012 at 04:54:01 PM PDT

  •  I honestly think his polling was so bad (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    subtropolis

    that he was losing his base in droves.  He hasn't stopped trying to shore up his base since the primary.  

    Unfortunately or fortunately for us, Romney tried distancing himself from Ryan the moment he picked him.  I honestly think he thought he could get away with that approach.   Obviously that was not going to fly.  

    So now Romney is 100% embracing the Ryan budget which I do not think he really wants to do.  I'm sure he'll flip flop back as soon as he can.  

    The longer this goes the more it looks like this was a very desperate move.  

    Is there any room for Obama moderates around here?

    by Bagger on Thu Aug 16, 2012 at 09:40:53 PM PDT

    •  his base live in the Hamptons (0+ / 0-)

      Of course, being the 1% they don't bring in enough votes on their own. That's Romney's biggest problem. Much of the usual Republican base is not doing so well financially. It's a tough enough sell with Richie Rich as the candidate, but now they've got to explain why the guy who wants to get rid of Medicaire is worth voting for. Desperate move, indeed.

      All things in the sky are pure to those who have no telescopes. – Charles Fort

      by subtropolis on Thu Aug 16, 2012 at 11:19:54 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site