Skip to main content

is the title of this op ed by Matt Miller in today's Washington Post.  Miller who is based at the Center for American Progress offers a weekly opinion column in the Post.   Today's is a keeper.

He focuses in on the most valuable part of the Ryan interview with Brit Hume of Fox News.  The veteran journalist focused on when Republican budget proposals would be in balance.  As Miller notes, Ryan hides behind his 'wonkiness' to try to avoid answering the difficult questions:  

Ryan (R-Wis.) tried to cloak himself in his supposedly charming “wonky-ness” to sidestep two simple questions from Hume: When does Mitt Romney’s budget reach balance, and when does Ryan’s own budget plan do the same? Ryan pirouetted because Hume’s queries threatened to expose his famed “fiscal conservatism” as a fraud.
Please keep reading.

Miller puts this in context of the 1990s, when the Gingrich proposal theoretically reached balance in 7 years, which forced Clinton into a proposal which reached balance in 10 years, then considered the outer acceptable limit.  (It is worth noting that the balance claimed including counting the surplus being collected on Social Security, but that is irrelevant to this discussion).

When the question is about Romney's proposal, Ryan is in trouble:  

Since Ryan knows that Romney’s bare sketch of a plan never reaches balance, he stumbles momentarily, before trying to move the conversation to his comfortable talking points about Romney’s goal of reducing spending to historic norms as a share of GDP.
 But Hume is having nothing of that, coming back again to the original question:  
“I get that,” Hume says. “But what about balance?”
  Ryan tried to hide behind wonkiness, saying the plan hasn't been scored.

He then tries to pivot to his own plan, which he begins to claim does balance the budget -  but not until the 2030s, which he does not want to have to admit.

You should read all of the analysis and commentary by Miller, who himself urges you to watch the relevant 2 minutes of the interview as exceprted in this CNN piece - that section of video should go viral, because it gives the lie to Ryan as a real fiscal conservative.

In his penultimate paragraph, Miller explains why this issue and how easily Ryan is exposed is important:  

The point: Democrats can’t afford to let Ryan/Romney’s phony image as superior fiscal stewards survive. And Hume’s interview shows how swiftly this charade can be exposed if Democrats and the press zero in on simple questions like Hume’s. If the press is primed to cover this more intelligently, such queries will also expose the big Republican lie — the idea that you can balance the budget as the baby boomers age without taxes rising.
Miller has a concern expressed in his final sentence:  
But if Democrats spend all their energy on Medicare — and don’t knock out the GOP ticket’s undeserved reputation for fiscal responsibility — they’ll find themselves in unexpected peril as the race heads to the fall.
I think he overplays that concern, because if properly explained the Republican position on Medicare is sufficient to win the Presidential election -  after all, there is NO path to 270 electoral votes for Romney if he loses the 29 in Florida.  But the Ryan budget passed by the House can be used to attack not just on Medicare but also on fiscal responsibility, and that, friends, may be the key to regaining the House of Representatives, and thus effective control of the making of governmental policy (provided continued Democratic control of the Senate also means eliminating or severe restriction of the filibuster and of holds).  

Miller is not normally a person whose opinions get wide distribution.  I thought this column was worthy of attention, which is why I posted this piece.

And besides, the idea of a "tell" is surely something that will, given America's fascination with poker, grab the attention of many people.

Have a nice day.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Meteor Blades, JekyllnHyde, Doug in SF, Mimikatz, DeminNewJ, Alma, TXdem, PrahaPartizan, True North, melo, grollen, deben, importer, Bob Love, bread, Emerson, Wintermute, billlaurelMD, SanJoseLady, jdld, mslat27, frisco, davelf2, Justina, bronte17, cskendrick, wonkydonkey, whenwego, CoolOnion, mkfarkus, ivote2004, bincbom, fumie, jhklawyer, jted, artebella, hopeful, dksbook, Quege, ammaloy, kharma, menodoc, psnyder, TexDem, figbash, MA Liberal, madame defarge, duncanidaho, dwahzon, 42, Catte Nappe, betson08, papercut, lcrp, clarknyc, walkshills, zerelda, Sembtex, mungley, tomjones, Emmy, eztempo, Sybil Liberty, bibble, Sassy, sawgrass727, Gowrie Gal, davidkc, nailbender, Dirk McQuigley, Los Diablo, maybeeso in michigan, historys mysteries, Tinfoil Hat, NoMoreLies, DianeNYS, Ckntfld, UncleCharlie, Chinton, OpherGopher, kitchen sink think tank, caliberal2001, citizenx, Clem Yeobright, dewtx, ChemBob, eru, Kayakbiker, Ice Blue, peteri2, blue jersey mom, jane123, kaliope, SBandini, Thursday Next, FindingMyVoice, distraught, turdraker, Ekaterin, Alan Arizona, xaxnar, Jim R, martini, LeighAnn, Debbie in ME, myboo, Clytemnestra, BlueInARedState, hungrycoyote, Yellow Canary, mooshter, KenBee, zesty grapher, luckydog, SherriG, StrayCat, Ashaman, Rosaura, JVolvo, plf515, ER Doc, Unknown Quantity, profh, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, BB10, means are the ends, kurious, bstotts, ms badger, Little, cpresley, orrg1, Thinking Fella, BeninSC, Cronesense, Debs2, gloriana, threegoal, cobaltbay, Msinformed, grassofleaves, Mary Mike, terabytes, Kentucky Kid, HCKAD, jayden, Templar, cyncynical, pioneer111, yella dawg, uciguy30, GeorgeXVIII, skod, trueblueliberal, Empower Ink, rmonroe, Mighty Ike, JDWolverton, 123man, TruthFreedomKindness, TX Freethinker, wayoutinthestix, Sixty Something, Youffraita, Foundmyvoice, elwior, skohayes, royce, hwmnbn, bluesheep, carver, alnep, glendaw271, petulans, luckylizard, My Spin, emidesu, psilocynic, GrannyOPhilly, prettygirlxoxoxo, Rhysling, J M F, Neon Vincent, litoralis, greengemini, Carol in San Antonio, be the change you seek, Nebraskablue, notrouble, jennylind, petral, followyourbliss, elziax, papahaha, kevinpdx, stevenwag, sfarkash, vadasz, jfromga, CountyMayoDem, Railfan, Amber6541, Just Bob, brooklyns finest, coppercelt, NJpeach, Tea and Strumpets, piers, fidellio, Crabby Abbey, womankind, Eddie L, gulfgal98, pixxer, ItsSimpleSimon, sharonsz, rja, ericlewis0, USHomeopath, fiercefilms, soaglow, Actbriniel, rmabelis, Onomastic, annieli, Barbara Marquardt, spindr27, mama jo, Catherine R, Bob Duck, slowbutsure, vahana, RedlandsDem, fishboots, OhioNatureMom, bookgirl, California06, CoExistNow, Haf2Read, Santa Susanna Kid, floridablue, 1718bill, TRPChicago, chira2, poliwrangler, Merry Light, Andrew F Cockburn, MA Mom, Vatexia, jolux, baquist, zenox, MikeBoyScout, DRo, No one gets out alive, Mathazar, SuWho, Only Needs a Beat, stormicats, Cordyc, RhodaA, OldDragon, sow hat, Mostel26, Sandi Behrns, a2nite, Trotskyrepublican, Mike RinRI, peachcreek, belinda ridgewood, Buckeye54, arizonablue, monkeybox, Marjmar, databob, Robynhood too, CalBearMom, Lizabet, nomandates, countwebb, Eric Twocents, Dewstino, Constantly Amazed, northerntier, Icicle68, OjaiValleyCali, Smoh

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site