Skip to main content

4c6ac754By now, I'm sure, you've heard about the Special Operations Opsec Education Fund, a group of retired military officers trying to swiftboat President Obama for catching and killing Osama bin Laden. According to them, Obama should have kept the killing secret. By announcing that US forces had pulled off this dangerous mission, they say, Obama compromised classified operational procedures and endangered military personnel.

The right has always had a problem accepting the fact that Obama succeeded where Bush failed. I saw something like what's happening today coming on May 2, 2011, the day after Obama announced bin Laden's death, when a wingnut relative posted this to Facebook: "I'm so proud to be an American.... Thank you GWB for the amount of faith and bravery you showed, shipping our soldiers over to fight for us!!!! USA." That the right would try to find a way to denigrate Obama's accomplishment was a given. Sure, their efforts come across as pathetic and graceless, but as long as some of the shit they throw sticks to Obama, they don't mind looking small.

One of the first things the right did was to lie about what Obama said on the night bin Laden was killed.  They said Obama claimed credit for the mission's success.  They've repeated the lie so many times citizens of Fox Nation have come to believe it.  It's nonsense, of course, easily disproven.  Here's the video of Obama's May 1, 2011 White House speech; nothing in it supports this ludicrous claim.  Obama said that "the United States launched a targeted operation against [bin Laden's] compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan"; he thanked "the countless intelligence and counterterrorism professionals who've worked tirelessly to achieve this outcome" and "the men who carried out this operation, for they exemplify the professionalism, patriotism, and unparalleled courage of those who serve our country."

Following that lie, another: Obama really had nothing to do with it and was merely an observer.  I can sort of understand that civilians may not realize the military does not act without orders from the president, but when I hear this crap coming from veterans and active duty military members, I want to tell them they should be ashamed of themselves.  They, of all people, know better.  The US military is not autonomous.  It does not carry out operations inside foreign countries—or even its own country—without orders from the very top.  It does not shed blood without approval from the chief, and in this case that chief was President Obama.

A related lie is that Obama merely green-lighted a mission any other president would have approved; that, presented with the intelligence on bin Laden's whereabouts, he essentially had no choice.  Of course he had a choice.  George W. Bush famously chose not to pursue bin Laden.  John McCain, during the 2008 presidential campaign, said he would not go into Pakistan to get bin Laden.  Mitt Romney, during the same campaign, said the same thing.  Obama always said he would, and when the time came he acted decisively and courageously, knowing full well he was risking not only American lives but his own presidency should the mission fail.  Even the most deluded, fact-denying teabagger remembers what happened to Jimmy Carter when Operation Eagle Claw fell apart in the Iranian desert.

As for the assertion that Obama should have kept the killing of bin Laden secret, if that doesn't deserve an automatic and universal WTF? I don't know what will.  Who didn't want bin Laden dead (other than the Taliban and our "allies" in Pakistan)?  What president wouldn't have announced the capture and execution of the world's most infamous terrorist?

Operational details: President Obama never spoke of them, nor did any other high-ranking official.  Granted, some innocuous details leaked out afterward, but whether those leaks came from people around Obama or from military and intelligence personnel who actually participated is anyone's guess.  When a mission succeeds, some details always leak.  Even if Obama had decided to keep the mission secret, the mere fact that we went into a country we were not at war with virtually guaranteed international headlines and consequent clamoring for details.

Now we come to the title of this diary, the thing that, as a retired military officer, I find intolerable: misusing the uniform to advocate for political causes.  Officer or enlisted, active duty or retired, the UCMJ says you can't do that.  Period.  You can vote for whomever you like, and you can speak freely as a private citizen.  But the minute you campaign for or against a political cause while putting yourself forward as a representative of the military, whether by wearing your uniform or introducing yourself with your rank and branch of service, you've crossed a line.  Why?  Because people will assume, at some level, that you are speaking for the military and thus the government, that what you say is sanctioned.

The military should have come down hard on General Boykin, the Christian fundamentalist who crusaded against Islam to civilian audiences while wearing his Army uniform.  But it didn't, and now who's to tell another politically active general he or she can't speak out in uniform?  So far General Boykin has been the exception, but how long will that last?  Last week the US Navy and Marine Corps allowed servicemembers, for the first time, to wear uniforms while participating in a San Diego gay pride parade.  Will military members cite that precedent to seek permission to advocate for other causes while in uniform?  Inevitably, they will.

It's a short step from these examples to openly campaigning against the president while identifying yourself as a current or former Navy SEAL, which is exactly what's going on with the Special Operations Opsec Education Fund.  The people behind this group are violating the UCMJ by abusing the uniform, engaging in conduct unbecoming, falsely suggesting to the American people that the US military opposes the current commander in chief.  There will always be some in the military who do, but don't you believe for one minute these assholes represent anyone but themselves.  They do not speak for the SEALs, the special operations community, or the military in general.  "Opsec," as the group refers to itself, is totally partisan, a political action committee (which, like other PACs, does not have to reveal its donors) made up of GOP and tea party hacks hiding behind uniforms.

In fact this outfit isn't much different than the hateful Indiana tea party group that put up this billboard, openly calling for the assassination of the president while implicitly claiming military approval by citing the US Navy SEALs and depicting special operations forces in uniform:

6a0111686ab237970c0176173fab0c970c-500wi

Here's what a real special operator, Admiral McRaven, leader of Joint Special Operations Command that conducted the raid on bin Laden's compound, had to say about President Obama and his role in the mission:

The president and his national security team—I’m not a political guy, but I will tell you as, as an interested observer in this—they were magnificent in how they handled it start to finish.

At the end of the day, make no mistake about it, it was the president of the United States that shouldered the burden for this operation, that made the hard decisions, that was instrumental in the planning process, because I pitched every plan to him.

You may hate President Obama.  You're certainly allowed to.  You can campaign against him (as a private citizen, not representing the military).  Come November you can vote against him.  But when it comes to killing Osama bin Laden, there's really only one thing you should say, and that is thank you.

Originally posted to pwoodford on Sat Aug 18, 2012 at 05:52 PM PDT.

Also republished by Military Community Members of Daily Kos and Community Spotlight.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Angie in WA State, DeminNewJ, Alma, Chi, hannah, Subterranean, asimbagirl, PeterHug, Emerson, Debby, Shockwave, Sherri in TX, donna in evanston, SanJoseLady, AAbshier, OLinda, eeff, Paulie200, concernedamerican, teresahill, ask, highacidity, boadicea, farmerhunt, paulitics, Nate Roberts, nupstateny, Cedwyn, CocoaLove, sidnora, wizardwerdna, Lilyvt, sockpuppet, TexDem, American Zapatista, Kentucky DeanDemocrat, hoolia, JimWilson, dwahzon, betson08, RuralLiberal, samoashark, riverlover, Wayward Wind, barbwires, outragedinSF, zerelda, ybruti, Sembtex, glattonfolly, tomjones, NapaJulie, JayDean, Jen Hayden, Sybil Liberty, Sassy, Tirge Caps, rapala, ExStr8, maybeeso in michigan, Tinfoil Hat, subtropolis, SherwoodB, vgranucci, JohnB47, EJP in Maine, cris0000, jimstaro, Sara R, aaraujo, GreyHawk, ladybug53, Gordon20024, Little Lulu, blue jersey mom, markdd, RichterScale, Savvy813, Shotput8, Ginny in CO, Naturalized Texan, sodalis, dsteffen, coloradorob, Ekaterin, Alan Arizona, kathny, noweasels, forbodyandmind, martini, occams hatchet, BachFan, LeighAnn, golem, Mr Bojangles, tung sol, hungrycoyote, profundo, kestrel9000, deha, blueoasis, aloevera, StrayCat, Rosaura, LibChicAZ, JVolvo, unclebucky, totallynext, OMwordTHRUdaFOG, MBNYC, llbear, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, emsprater, BB10, nannyboz, kurious, AllanTBG, sea note, Quicklund, Pandoras Box, cpresley, orrg1, timewarp, Cronesense, FWIW, weneedahero, devis1, bfbenn, gloriana, NovatoBon, Stwriley, karmsy, tbirchard, bnasley, Kentucky Kid, US Blues, second gen, SeaTurtle, millwood, pioneer111, uciguy30, ThePlainThinker, craiger, JDWolverton, rogerdaddy, ChocolateChris, Mr Stagger Lee, Old Lefty, Sharon Wraight, jakebob, here4tehbeer, Lujane, rssrai, pamelabrown, Cassandra Waites, smartdemmg, envwq, temptxan, BlueStateRedhead, OrdinaryIowan, dmhlt 66, cactusflinthead, shortgirl, statsone, Purple Priestess, maggiejean, ronnied, Carol in San Antonio, A Southerner in Yankeeland, Nebraskablue, WakeUpNeo, ebrann, CamillesDad1, elziax, MKSinSA, uno beagle, COwoman, Shelley99, Question Authority, sfarkash, maxzj05, Tortmaster, stillonline, Livvy5, LookingUp, Lefty Ladig, cassandraX, BigVegan, coppercelt, arabian, Laurilei, The Jester, eXtina, Heidiho610, politik, michelewln, angelajean, batchick, pixxer, anonevent, Otteray Scribe, petesmom, nosleep4u, cany, Its a New Day, Actbriniel, tgrshark13, theKgirls, Jane Lew, yellow cosmic seed, mama jo, I love OCD, Quite Contrary, ozsea1, spooks51, Bob Duck, nervousnellie, AdamR510, Susipsych, fishboots, mikejay611, kpal711, KelleyRN2, molunkusmol, Haf2Read, zukesgirl64, thomask, Dreidlgirl, ilovecheese, CorinaR, VTCC73, BlueZ, Dbug, Sonofasailor, DRo, Davui, Mathazar, YaNevaNo, Only Needs a Beat, KiB, OldDragon, Heart n Mind, Barbie02360, leathersmith, lurkyloo, IndieGuy, EclecticCrafter, draa, Trotskyrepublican, This old man, jan4insight, reginahny, radical simplicity, pittie70, arizonablue, etherealfire, monkeybox, FrY10cK, Spirit of Life, Melanie in IA, CalBearMom, Sue B, Canis Aureus, DamselleFly, onceasgt, countwebb, newinfluence, Caedy, weck, Southcoast Luna, Jollie Ollie Orange, Constantly Amazed, helpImdrowning, Smoh, Blue Boomer, Grizzard, Joliem

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site